Porsche Drivers Council: Focus Group
#31
Burning Brakes
The 992 shown at this focus group was the production version and not another concept variant.
To repeat, the 3rd brake light is vertical and stands out like a sore thumb in the middle of the engine cover. It was ugly to me. Also, the gear shift is the same as the spy shot where it is an electric travel razor. More important to me was some of the materials were cheaper than normally seen plastics in the 991.
To repeat, the 3rd brake light is vertical and stands out like a sore thumb in the middle of the engine cover. It was ugly to me. Also, the gear shift is the same as the spy shot where it is an electric travel razor. More important to me was some of the materials were cheaper than normally seen plastics in the 991.
I think we’re being trolled by Porsche with that gear shifter. Even the Panamera isn’t that bad. Look at every other modern 911 derivative; they’ve produced some evil cool PDK shifters. A female friend of mine once described the RS shifter as - ‘if Darth Vader had a dik, that’s what it would look like’. Now I can’t unsee it.
#32
Also, previously Porsche placed both shifters in a fairly similar (interchangeable, I presume) center console panel. Don't quite see why they would now implement a PDK shifter that's so substantially different from the manual one, or from the PDK shifter in any other Porsche. Plus, with that approach they can't even charge for different PDK shifter design options anymore...
#33
#34
The 992 shown at this focus group was the production version and not another concept variant.
To repeat, the 3rd brake light is vertical and stands out like a sore thumb in the middle of the engine cover. It was ugly to me. Also, the gear shift is the same as the spy shot where it is an electric travel razor. More important to me was some of the materials were cheaper than normally seen plastics in the 991.
To repeat, the 3rd brake light is vertical and stands out like a sore thumb in the middle of the engine cover. It was ugly to me. Also, the gear shift is the same as the spy shot where it is an electric travel razor. More important to me was some of the materials were cheaper than normally seen plastics in the 991.
I work in the auto industry and work with OEMs to do early product clinic research, like the research that some people in this thread attended. Being this far out from the purported reveal of the production model at Paris or LA, and with a rumored on-sale date of late Q1 or early Q2 of 2019, you more than likely saw a pre-production model at the focus group.
#36
Rennlist Member
The focus of the focus group was not design of the 992. I'll leave it at that.
#37
Burning Brakes
#38
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by JMartinni
Correction, I remembered there's one.
What matters is how the car drives. Couldn't give a damn what the shifter looks like.
#39
Rennlist Member
That is not true in certain states where consideration is only required on one side. By having consideration on both sides, you completely avoid the argument entirely, but in some states, consideration on only one side (agreement not to disclose something that you may otherwise be permitted to disclose) is sufficient even if there is no payment.
#40
Rennlist Member
So, in consideration for being granted access to prototype and pre-production materials and ideas, you agree not to disclose that same material and ideas.
#41
My $0.02
Access to confidential information can be a form or consideration, otherwise every standard NDA out in the market is void. I'd suggest that the Porsche lawyers are fairly conservative given the amount of regulation they deal with on a day to day basis, so they have probably insisted that the participants be paid so that the consideration is clear.
The other way to do it would be through a deed (which doesn't require consideration), but they are more difficult to execute.
Access to confidential information can be a form or consideration, otherwise every standard NDA out in the market is void. I'd suggest that the Porsche lawyers are fairly conservative given the amount of regulation they deal with on a day to day basis, so they have probably insisted that the participants be paid so that the consideration is clear.
The other way to do it would be through a deed (which doesn't require consideration), but they are more difficult to execute.
#43
Rennlist Member
Consideration does not need to be monetary and may be nominal. That’s covered in the third day of law school.
#45
Originally Posted by phx991
Consideration does not need to be monetary and may be nominal. That’s covered in the third day of law school.
- from a short lived attorney