Title: 2022 992 Turbo S PCCB – 4927 vs 8286 (front) + 4925 (rear) + Pagid RSC1 confir
Hi all,
I’m trying to confirm the correct Pagid pad shapes (front and rear) before ordering RSC1, as I’m getting conflicting info from different suppliers.
Car:
Front:
Confusion:
Run Pagid RSC1 for occasional track use, but avoid ordering the wrong pad shape.
Appreciate any confirmed data, photos, or PET screenshots.
Thanks!
I’m trying to confirm the correct Pagid pad shapes (front and rear) before ordering RSC1, as I’m getting conflicting info from different suppliers.
Car:
- 2022 Porsche 992 Turbo S
- PCCB (ceramic brakes)
- OEM front pads: 992 698 151 L
- OEM rear pads: 992 698 451 L
Front:
- 4927 → 198 × 88 mm
- 8286 → 195 × 101 mm
- 4925 (commonly listed for PCCB Turbo/GT3 platforms)
Confusion:
- Gieffe / Atomic → list 4927 (RSC1) for 992 Turbo S PCCB
- Hinz Motorsport → sells RSC1 in shape 8286 also labeled for 992 Turbo S PCCB
- Can anyone with a 2022 992 Turbo S PCCB confirm their actual pad shapes:
- Front: 4927 or 8286?
- Rear: 4925?
- Has anyone physically removed/measured pads on this exact setup?
- Are there two different front PCCB calipers on 992 Turbo S, depending on production batch or supplier?
- Does OEM:
- 992 698 151 L → map to 4927?
- 992 698 451 L → map to 4925?
- Any real-world feedback on Pagid RSC1 vs OEM on PCCB:
- Disc wear
- Noise
- Daily drivability
Run Pagid RSC1 for occasional track use, but avoid ordering the wrong pad shape.
Appreciate any confirmed data, photos, or PET screenshots.
Thanks!


