Notices
992 Turbo and Turbo S 2019-Current
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche San Francisco

992 Turbo S - Tune only (Real World results)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2022, 01:15 PM
  #1  
anes911
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
anes911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 70
Received 36 Likes on 13 Posts
Default 992 Turbo S - Tune only (Real World results)

2022 992 Turbo S
M- Engineering stage 1 tune only on 93 pump.

** this was an easy repeatable process. Car drives like stock ++





The following 12 users liked this post by anes911:
.gearhead. (04-25-2023), elvisdoc (09-22-2024), El_Pato_Loco (04-25-2023), ER911S (01-03-2022), hcvone (01-03-2022), imahobo (09-20-2023), MovingChicane (03-25-2024), Pad Bender (01-04-2022), peterdouglas (01-03-2022), r00t61 (01-03-2022), Steve 96C4S (01-03-2022), wotaskd (01-03-2022) and 7 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 01-03-2022, 01:18 PM
  #2  
NVRANUF
Rennlist Member
 
NVRANUF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In a van down by the Ottawa River ...
Posts: 4,136
Received 469 Likes on 264 Posts
Default

VERY Impressive!!
Old 01-03-2022, 03:39 PM
  #3  
ER911S
Pro
 
ER911S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 521
Received 232 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Thanks for sharing. I have not done draggy yet.
Strong 0-60 . I must admit I was hoping for a bit lower 1/4 but you got into the 140s which is impressive.
60-130 is a huge improvement.
Old 01-03-2022, 03:43 PM
  #4  
anes911
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
anes911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 70
Received 36 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ER911S
Thanks for sharing. I have not done draggy yet.
Strong 0-60 . I must admit I was hoping for a bit lower 1/4 but you got into the 140s which is impressive.
60-130 is a huge improvement.

this is TUNE only.
no exhaust, no race gas, no weight savings, none of that.

There is Not a stage 1 faster.
I should be stage 2 by end of this week. Will post results.
The following 2 users liked this post by anes911:
NigelPlays (01-03-2022), Pad Bender (01-04-2022)
Old 01-03-2022, 04:01 PM
  #5  
Pathy
Racer
 
Pathy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 287
Received 74 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

How much more performance could be wrangled out of the car if you upgraded the Turbos and added a catless exhaust, you think?
Old 01-03-2022, 05:09 PM
  #6  
hcvone
Rennlist Member
 
hcvone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Town of Webb, NY/Huntingdon Valley, PA
Posts: 1,868
Received 805 Likes on 499 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pathy
How much more performance could be wrangled out of the car if you upgraded the Turbos and added a catless exhaust, you think?
Running 93 octane, with Kline headers, catless, Kline exhaust, intercooler, Tial xxx turbo's and M tuning I get 791 plus wheel hp, on 100 octanme tune I could get near 900 whp, but then you need an expensive transmission upgrade. The sky and your bank account is the only limit, don't belive me, wait to you see the 23' 992 tts I'm working on.
Old 01-03-2022, 05:14 PM
  #7  
Markoz28
Instructor
 
Markoz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 113
Received 43 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

very impressed!
Old 01-03-2022, 05:26 PM
  #8  
ER911S
Pro
 
ER911S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 521
Received 232 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by anes911
this is TUNE only.
no exhaust, no race gas, no weight savings, none of that.

There is Not a stage 1 faster.
I should be stage 2 by end of this week. Will post results.
Do not get me wrong, I am not disappointed with your results but let me throw this out here and that was in Florida with a DA that I am willing to bet was worse and an extra passenger. 2 tenths is quite a bit of a difference.
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...k-exhaust.html
Old 01-03-2022, 05:35 PM
  #9  
911dude41
Drifting
 
911dude41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 2,483
Received 1,234 Likes on 710 Posts
Default

LOL @ Elevation and DA.

Were these runs done in a freezer under the ocean? Nice times, but not realistic to most of the world... Meaning the same car wouldn't be putting down those times in normal conditions.
The following users liked this post:
Esquiire (01-03-2022)
Old 01-03-2022, 06:22 PM
  #10  
M Engineering
Platinum Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
M Engineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: SoCal / AZ / South FL
Posts: 1,129
Received 1,595 Likes on 573 Posts
Default



-Charles@M
Old 01-04-2022, 12:59 AM
  #11  
boosted305
Instructor
 
boosted305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 98
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911dude41
LOL @ Elevation and DA.

Were these runs done in a freezer under the ocean? Nice times, but not realistic to most of the world... Meaning the same car wouldn't be putting down those times in normal conditions.
That did seem odd...but then the last timeslip shows "normal" elevation and DA with a consistent time and trap speed...perhaps the others were just a glitch?
Old 01-04-2022, 01:17 AM
  #12  
Pad Bender
Rennlist Member
 
Pad Bender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Great White North
Posts: 1,815
Received 1,298 Likes on 655 Posts
Default

9.x second car is stupid fast...

That is a significant gains for the dollar no doubt about it.

Still waiting to see the TT file from M-Engineering...inevitably I will be on board.
Old 01-04-2022, 01:27 AM
  #13  
anes911
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
anes911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 70
Received 36 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911dude41
LOL @ Elevation and DA.

Were these runs done in a freezer under the ocean? Nice times, but not realistic to most of the world... Meaning the same car wouldn't be putting down those times in normal conditions.

you mean 75% of the world lol
average world temp is 57*F

DA was basically 0
Temp is 50* F

if you live in state or country with **** temps than too bad for you; I would be upset too if I had a slow car. Kick rocks bozo.

me Taking advantage of climate in real world setting is wrong? Lol then I guess you taking advantage of all the freedoms the USA gives us also wrong.

punk bitch.

Old 01-04-2022, 01:29 AM
  #14  
anes911
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
anes911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 70
Received 36 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boosted305
That did seem odd...but then the last timeslip shows "normal" elevation and DA with a consistent time and trap speed...perhaps the others were just a glitch?

there are no glitches.
i have multiple runs and multiple video footage of all.
I am located in the east coast, NJ to be specific.
Old 01-04-2022, 01:38 AM
  #15  
boosted305
Instructor
 
boosted305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 98
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by anes911
there are no glitches.
i have multiple runs and multiple video footage of all.
I am located in the east coast, NJ to be specific.
I was only referring to the altitude and DA in your first couple slips showing -105 feet... but then +134 feet in your last slip which seems more "normal".


Quick Reply: 992 Turbo S - Tune only (Real World results)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:13 PM.