When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Thanks for sharing. I have not done draggy yet.
Strong 0-60 . I must admit I was hoping for a bit lower 1/4 but you got into the 140s which is impressive.
60-130 is a huge improvement.
Thanks for sharing. I have not done draggy yet.
Strong 0-60 . I must admit I was hoping for a bit lower 1/4 but you got into the 140s which is impressive.
60-130 is a huge improvement.
this is TUNE only.
no exhaust, no race gas, no weight savings, none of that.
There is Not a stage 1 faster.
I should be stage 2 by end of this week. Will post results.
How much more performance could be wrangled out of the car if you upgraded the Turbos and added a catless exhaust, you think?
Running 93 octane, with Kline headers, catless, Kline exhaust, intercooler, Tial xxx turbo's and M tuning I get 791 plus wheel hp, on 100 octanme tune I could get near 900 whp, but then you need an expensive transmission upgrade. The sky and your bank account is the only limit, don't belive me, wait to you see the 23' 992 tts I'm working on.
this is TUNE only.
no exhaust, no race gas, no weight savings, none of that.
There is Not a stage 1 faster.
I should be stage 2 by end of this week. Will post results.
Do not get me wrong, I am not disappointed with your results but let me throw this out here and that was in Florida with a DA that I am willing to bet was worse and an extra passenger. 2 tenths is quite a bit of a difference. https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...k-exhaust.html
Were these runs done in a freezer under the ocean? Nice times, but not realistic to most of the world... Meaning the same car wouldn't be putting down those times in normal conditions.
Were these runs done in a freezer under the ocean? Nice times, but not realistic to most of the world... Meaning the same car wouldn't be putting down those times in normal conditions.
That did seem odd...but then the last timeslip shows "normal" elevation and DA with a consistent time and trap speed...perhaps the others were just a glitch?
Were these runs done in a freezer under the ocean? Nice times, but not realistic to most of the world... Meaning the same car wouldn't be putting down those times in normal conditions.
you mean 75% of the world lol
average world temp is 57*F
DA was basically 0
Temp is 50* F
if you live in state or country with **** temps than too bad for you; I would be upset too if I had a slow car. Kick rocks bozo.
me Taking advantage of climate in real world setting is wrong? Lol then I guess you taking advantage of all the freedoms the USA gives us also wrong.
That did seem odd...but then the last timeslip shows "normal" elevation and DA with a consistent time and trap speed...perhaps the others were just a glitch?
there are no glitches.
i have multiple runs and multiple video footage of all.
I am located in the east coast, NJ to be specific.
there are no glitches.
i have multiple runs and multiple video footage of all.
I am located in the east coast, NJ to be specific.
I was only referring to the altitude and DA in your first couple slips showing -105 feet... but then +134 feet in your last slip which seems more "normal".