Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: What type of bra is on your 911?
I don't need no bra, bro
26.49%
Front bra installed
52.98%
Full bra, like those 1950s swimsuits
14.57%
Full bra, 7 coats of wax, armed security guards
6.62%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 151. You may not vote on this poll

Poll: Do you have clear bra / film on your 911? Would you get them again?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2017, 11:43 AM
  #16  
Jay-S
Rennlist Member
 
Jay-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 544
Received 161 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by StormRune
I find most of your post to be wrong. Have you actually had or even seen a good clear bra? I assume you must have seen at least one poorly done example, but I've seen quite a few very good ones.

My car came with Xpel Ultimate from the prior owner. Here are my observations on your comments:

1. It looks ugly when the car is slightly dusty.
- Well my car rarely gets dusty, but when it does I see no difference in dusting between the paint and the bra.

2. If it gets damaged, you can't just replace one panel, they usually have to do adjacent panels too depending on how old the film is.
- If you get hit by something hard enough to damage the film, guess what it would have done to the paint. And you can certainly replace just one piece. If it is old enough you can tell the difference, it needs to be replace anyway (5+ years)

3. Dust/dirt gets trapped in the edges
- I have not seen this, the edges on mine are perfectly clean after 27k miles.

4. There are very few good installers and a lot of shoddy installers.
- So find a good one. Not an excuse.

5. The best installers in my area aren't even listed on the xpel site, go figure.
6. They can get stained

- I don't think so. I have no stains that I can detect and I'm pretty fastidious about keeping things clean. But my car is Agate so I can't really say how it might look on a white car. There is certainly nothing obvious on mine.

7. The car will never shine the same way as raw paint.
- No one has ever seemed to notice my clear bra. When I tell people it is there, the only way they seem to confirm is to find an edge. It appears at least 99% as shiny to me.

8. Dr Colorscratch is super easy to use and works GREAT and costs less than 100 bucks. Clear bras run about 2500 for the front clip and around 5K for a full body application.
- The paint chip repair stuff you mention still leaves perceivable imperfections, it just fills them in with color so the chips don't stand out as much. Any chip bigger than a pin ***** will still leave a bit of a dimple.
I've used this quite a bit on a number of cars.

- I asked the place that does my window tinting, they also do Suntek, how much it will be when the time comes to replace. They currently charge $1200 for the front bumper, full front hood and fenders, and mirrors.

9. Who knows what the long term effects of the glue are on the paint
- Plenty of people do. The only time I've ever heard of a problem with a quality clear bra is when it has been left on far too many years, typically 7 more and with the car left in the sun a lot.

10.it looks ugly.
- You can't even see mine without a close examination to find an edge. How does that look ugly?! Rock chips filled with color chip repairs are far more noticeable and unattractive.

The final plus I've noticed is that bug splatters and the like clean off some much more easily.

I'd never had a clear bra before, but now I always will on a top-end car.
+1
Old 03-07-2017, 12:16 PM
  #17  
Speed2000
Instructor
 
Speed2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Here's what it has done to a few headlights. I wouldn't cover them unless you plan to track the car and warn against them to my customers.

It can be replaced in sections and I've seen the film save a lot of paint repairs like this Macan that hit the side of their garage.
Attached Images    
Old 03-07-2017, 01:28 PM
  #18  
HK G36C
Rennlist Member
 
HK G36C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Great Northwest
Posts: 862
Received 62 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

I had it on my 993 and it was invaluable, however, on a black car [which I will never own again] chips show up more. I have a full frontal now and love it!
Old 03-07-2017, 02:23 PM
  #19  
points
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
points's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: delray beach florida
Posts: 15,638
Received 196 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by StormRune
I find most of your post to be wrong. Have you actually had or even seen a good clear bra? I assume you must have seen at least one poorly done example, but I've seen quite a few very good ones.

My car came with Xpel Ultimate from the prior owner. Here are my observations on your comments:

1. It looks ugly when the car is slightly dusty.
- Well my car rarely gets dusty, but when it does I see no difference in dusting between the paint and the bra.

2. If it gets damaged, you can't just replace one panel, they usually have to do adjacent panels too depending on how old the film is.
- If you get hit by something hard enough to damage the film, guess what it would have done to the paint. And you can certainly replace just one piece. If it is old enough you can tell the difference, it needs to be replace anyway (5+ years)

3. Dust/dirt gets trapped in the edges
- I have not seen this, the edges on mine are perfectly clean after 27k miles.

4. There are very few good installers and a lot of shoddy installers.
- So find a good one. Not an excuse.

5. The best installers in my area aren't even listed on the xpel site, go figure.
6. They can get stained

- I don't think so. I have no stains that I can detect and I'm pretty fastidious about keeping things clean. But my car is Agate so I can't really say how it might look on a white car. There is certainly nothing obvious on mine.

7. The car will never shine the same way as raw paint.
- No one has ever seemed to notice my clear bra. When I tell people it is there, the only way they seem to confirm is to find an edge. It appears at least 99% as shiny to me.

8. Dr Colorscratch is super easy to use and works GREAT and costs less than 100 bucks. Clear bras run about 2500 for the front clip and around 5K for a full body application.
- The paint chip repair stuff you mention still leaves perceivable imperfections, it just fills them in with color so the chips don't stand out as much. Any chip bigger than a pin ***** will still leave a bit of a dimple.
I've used this quite a bit on a number of cars.

- I asked the place that does my window tinting, they also do Suntek, how much it will be when the time comes to replace. They currently charge $1200 for the front bumper, full front hood and fenders, and mirrors.

9. Who knows what the long term effects of the glue are on the paint
- Plenty of people do. The only time I've ever heard of a problem with a quality clear bra is when it has been left on far too many years, typically 7 more and with the car left in the sun a lot.

10.it looks ugly.
- You can't even see mine without a close examination to find an edge. How does that look ugly?! Rock chips filled with color chip repairs are far more noticeable and unattractive.

The final plus I've noticed is that bug splatters and the like clean off some much more easily.

I'd never had a clear bra before, but now I always will on a top-end car.
+2.
Old 03-07-2017, 02:38 PM
  #20  
911boy
Three Wheelin'
 
911boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,852
Received 137 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bmedude
I went back and fourth on this for months. Here is why I finally decided on NO.

1. It looks ugly when the car is slightly dusty.
2. If it gets damaged, you can't just replace one panel, they usually have to do adjacent panels too depending on how old the film is.
3. Dust/dirt gets trapped in the edges
4. There are very few good installers and a lot of shoddy installers.
5. The best installers in my area aren't even listed on the xpel site, go figure.
6. They can get stained
7. The car will never shine the same way as raw paint.
8. Dr Colorscratch is super easy to use and works GREAT and costs less than 100 bucks. Clear bras run about 2500 for the front clip and around 5K for a full body application.
9. Who knows what the long term effects of the glue are on the paint
10.it looks ugly.
saved me a lot of typing too. Like putting plastic on your couch IMO. I hand wash 2-3 times per week and just can't get my head around washing and waxing plastic. Who am i saving the finish for? I MAY do the bumper.
Old 03-07-2017, 02:53 PM
  #21  
rk-d
Rennlist Member
 
rk-d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 8,145
Received 6,464 Likes on 2,812 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by StormRune
7. The car will never shine the same way as raw paint.
- No one has ever seemed to notice my clear bra. When I tell people it is there, the only way they seem to confirm is to find an edge. It appears at least 99% as shiny to me.
.
I'm sorry but this is wrong. Even the best installers will tell you that nothing shines like raw paint.

You may not notice enough to care, but it doesn't mean others won't.
Old 03-07-2017, 03:08 PM
  #22  
Penn4S
Rennlist Member
 
Penn4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,732
Received 1,330 Likes on 750 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rk-d
I'm sorry but this is wrong. Even the best installers will tell you that nothing shines like raw paint.

You may not notice enough to care, but it doesn't mean others won't.
I don't disagree with what you are saying. I guess it is about some level of compromise. I too refused to do it on several past cars because I like detailing my own car and wanted to deal with paint not film. But I also had to accept a rock chipped hood and fenders and touch up was a part of a normal detail.

I have lived in the North East for a long time, roads suck, sand and salt suck, I live in Pa in horse country where they throw this volcanic stone/ash during snow and in the spring its like having your fenders sandblasted. The last 2 cars and my wife's Macan are Xpel covered and it has saved a lot of headaches. Recently some alien bird crapped on her fender and before I saw it, it had eaten through the Xpel. The warranty covered the removal and reapplication of the whole front of the car and the paint was saved. So for me the compromise is worth it.

But to each his own.
Old 03-07-2017, 03:40 PM
  #23  
Gary JR
Rennlist Member
 
Gary JR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: S Carolina coast & N Carolina mountains
Posts: 1,785
Received 158 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911boy
saved me a lot of typing too. Like putting plastic on your couch IMO. I hand wash 2-3 times per week and just can't get my head around washing and waxing plastic. Who am i saving the finish for? I MAY do the bumper.
The point is washing is easier and your right - why wax film? It's already like looking through clear glass at paint that never ages.
Old 03-07-2017, 03:41 PM
  #24  
spiderv6
Rennlist Member
 
spiderv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,644
Received 268 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

I'm on the fence as well.

My real life experience was a 3M wrap on my 996 many years ago. That made the car look like crap - but I know the technology has moved on a lot since then.

I really enjoy detailing my car. I cannot for the life of me get my head around the idea of waxing a plastic cover. Sorry, just does not compute.

I have a black car. I have rock chips that shine white. I am an idiot for not getting film.

At this point I am shrugging my shoulders and sticking with bare metal.
Old 03-07-2017, 03:48 PM
  #25  
rk-d
Rennlist Member
 
rk-d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 8,145
Received 6,464 Likes on 2,812 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Penn4S
I don't disagree with what you are saying. I guess it is about some level of compromise. I too refused to do it on several past cars because I like detailing my own car and wanted to deal with paint not film. But I also had to accept a rock chipped hood and fenders and touch up was a part of a normal detail.

I have lived in the North East for a long time, roads suck, sand and salt suck, I live in Pa in horse country where they throw this volcanic stone/ash during snow and in the spring its like having your fenders sandblasted. The last 2 cars and my wife's Macan are Xpel covered and it has saved a lot of headaches. Recently some alien bird crapped on her fender and before I saw it, it had eaten through the Xpel. The warranty covered the removal and reapplication of the whole front of the car and the paint was saved. So for me the compromise is worth it.

But to each his own.
Clarity is compromised. Is it worth it for the benefits in reducing chips and holograms, swirls? 99%, yes it is. But it's no free lunch.

That's what I'm considering -- I will probably do it again on a limited basis
Old 03-07-2017, 04:00 PM
  #26  
visitador
Rennlist Member
 
visitador's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 1,757
Received 144 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Back in 1980, I got a Subaru as my first car. Got convinced by the dealer to put some kind of wrap. Made the paint worse over the years.

Since then, I don't do plastic on my face and I certainly don't do that on my cars
Old 03-07-2017, 04:03 PM
  #27  
Speed2000
Instructor
 
Speed2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rk-d
I'm sorry but this is wrong. Even the best installers will tell you that nothing shines like raw paint.

You may not notice enough to care, but it doesn't mean others won't.
The bottom picture of the Macan is after film was replaced. The newer products have improved over the last few years with higher gloss finishes and most now have self healing properties for minor scratches and just recently hydrophobic top coats have been brought to market.

This is what I do for a living so obviously I think its a good idea. The film on my personal car is nearly five years old and after 45,000 miles....no rock chips OR swirl marks
Attached Images  
Old 03-07-2017, 04:05 PM
  #28  
rk-d
Rennlist Member
 
rk-d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 8,145
Received 6,464 Likes on 2,812 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Speed2000
The bottom picture of the Macan is after film was replaced. The newer products have improved over the last few years with higher gloss finishes and most now have self healing properties for minor scratches and just recently hydrophobic top coats have been brought to market.

This is what I do for a living so obviously I think its a good idea. The film on my personal car is nearly five years old and after 45,000 miles....no rock chips OR swirl marks
I had Xpel Ultimate. I've heard Suntek is better to avoid that orange peel (exaggeration, but no other term to describe it) look.
Old 03-07-2017, 04:19 PM
  #29  
911boy
Three Wheelin'
 
911boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,852
Received 137 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary JR
The point is washing is easier and your right - why wax film? It's already like looking through clear glass at paint that never ages.
Again, I wash 2-3 times /week in summer and if I drive it in the winter (got it in December) I rinse it off almost daily. Not sure how washing could be made easier.
I think I'll get front bumper done and see how that looks but can't see doing any more. To each his own.
Old 03-07-2017, 04:19 PM
  #30  
Speed2000
Instructor
 
Speed2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

We have been using Suntek since it came out. Very clear film and the adhesive isn't as aggressive as the other products so its the easiest to remove years later.


Quick Reply: Poll: Do you have clear bra / film on your 911? Would you get them again?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:08 PM.