Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is the 991.1/2 a sportscar anymore...?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2016, 06:47 AM
  #46  
BertoneBertoni
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
BertoneBertoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Valkuri


Perhaps my dictionary is a more current edition than yours…!
Your dictionary's edition is indeed - post acceptance of Outlaw and Singer - more 'current' than mine. Unfortunately for our 991-owning confreres it was originally published before mine....
Old 11-19-2016, 06:50 AM
  #47  
BertoneBertoni
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
BertoneBertoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fred2
GT cars would also include cars like the Panamera, Jaguar XK, BMW 6 series and cars from Aston Martin. These would be cars that can consume miles by the hundred in comfort. However, they are not at home on the racetrack when driven hard.

The 991 has the unique quality that it is a borderline "luxurious" streetcar that is at home on the racetrack.

That puts it into Sportscar territory.
You, Sir, make a fair point which naturally leads us to the more refined question implicit at the heart of the debate: which 911 (within its extensive, perhaps even borderline-bewildering, range) is the real sportscar....?
Old 11-19-2016, 10:41 AM
  #48  
Dan Nagy
Rennlist Member
 
Dan Nagy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: The Beach
Posts: 4,509
Received 2,219 Likes on 1,117 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BertoneBertoni
You, Sir, make a fair point which naturally leads us to the more refined question implicit at the heart of the debate: which 911 (within its extensive, perhaps even borderline-bewildering, range) is the real sportscar....?
It's a trick question! Randy Pobst takes the 2017 Base model for a nice spin on the track in the Motor Trend review.
Old 11-19-2016, 10:54 AM
  #49  
Al.Fresco
Three Wheelin'
 
Al.Fresco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,852
Received 332 Likes on 190 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BertoneBertoni
Of course, this is a light-hearted debate NOT about the 911....It is a debate about the 911 'RANGE', now that it has become (arguably) a brand-within-brand.

Is any Targa the sportscar among the 911 range ? Mmmmm, some say "The Targa is the Jensen Interceptor of 911s"....but that, though amusing for some, would be a tad cruel, wouldn't it ?!
At least you didn't say AMC Pacer.
Old 11-19-2016, 01:03 PM
  #50  
BertoneBertoni
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
BertoneBertoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fasttr
At least you didn't say AMC Pacer.
Now that really is cruel...... Actually, the 993/6/7 Targa I got. Hey, a 911 that was a hatchback: cool ! You can put your golf clubs in without opening a door.....

Function triumphs over form....as any keen follower of Bauhaus or, indeed, Ferdinand Porsche will attest to. But copying a '67 Targa design seems to sweep under the carpet the historical fact that the 'Targa' was only brought in for increasingly stringent roll-over regs in the US...not because the designers thought whacking on a massive roll-over hoop on a cabrio was aesthetically appealing...

I'm sorry..... but the 991 Targa is turning Porsche design principles on its head: form over function. Now, centuwions, welease the Targa Hate Mail....
Old 11-19-2016, 01:07 PM
  #51  
BertoneBertoni
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
BertoneBertoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dan Nagy
It's a trick question! Randy Pobst takes the 2017 Base model for a nice spin on the track in the Motor Trend review.

Ah, at last....a man of discernment who knew this apparently simple, hackneyed and seemingly tedious question had already been answered by the esteemed Mr Pobst....

Last edited by BertoneBertoni; 11-24-2016 at 03:41 PM.
Old 11-19-2016, 02:00 PM
  #52  
fast1
Race Car
 
fast1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,899
Received 221 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BertoneBertoni
You, Sir, make a fair point which naturally leads us to the more refined question implicit at the heart of the debate: which 911 (within its extensive, perhaps even borderline-bewildering, range) is the real sportscar....?
The answer as to what a sports car is has become blurred over the decades. If you go back to the 60s and 70s, it was quite easy. There were cars that were designed for your basic transportation (basically appliances), there were luxury cars, and then there were sports cars. Everyone knew what the sports cars were in the early 70s: 911, Corvette, Ferrari, Triumph, MG, and a few others. They were spartan cars that were designed primarily for track use but were street legal.

In 2016 the definition of a sports car is a lot more complex. The definition of what a sports car is reminds me of the debate in the Supreme Court over the definition of pornography. Probably the best answer was offered by Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart : “I know it when I see it”.

So using the “I know it when I see it” model, ole timers like me, my first 911 was purchased in 1970, have a hard time looking at a 911 with full leather, power seats, automatic transmission, Bose stereo, power everything, navigation, etc as a sports car; GT car yes, sports car no. My 2250 lb 1970 911 had a MT, AM radio, and a heater. Lincolns and Cadillacs had all the "goodies" and were over double the size of my 911.

Having said this I have no problem if a 991 owner with all the luxury options, believes he is driving a sports car. Even though his hands stay warm in the winter because he has a heated steering wheel, and his butt stays warm with the heated seats, if he thinks he is driving a sports car, what's the harm.
Old 11-20-2016, 10:30 PM
  #53  
Valkuri
Burning Brakes
 
Valkuri's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: American Southwest
Posts: 815
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

but that, though amusing for some, would be a tad cruel, wouldn't it ?!
As if cruel humor is somehow taboo or unknown to Rennlist?

C'mon: 'Giant Jesus Statue Falls on Church Bus'; 'Greenpeace Volunteer Eaten By Polar Bear'; 'Clinton Wins Popular Vote, Loses Election': Cruel, and yet intensely funny, every one of 'em.
Old 11-20-2016, 10:43 PM
  #54  
Valkuri
Burning Brakes
 
Valkuri's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: American Southwest
Posts: 815
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

So using the “I know it when I see it” model, ole timers like me, my first 911 was purchased in 1970, have a hard time looking at a 911 with full leather, power seats, automatic transmission, Bose stereo, power everything, navigation, etc as a sports car; GT car yes, sports car no. My 2250 lb 1970 911 had a MT, AM radio, and a heater.
Hard to argue.
I personally want to add a TR6 to my garage. Quirky, though not MGB-level quirky; drafty, under equipped with creature comforts, likely slower than a new Toyota: And yet none would question its 'sports car' inclusion.
My own idiosyncrasy (one of a well-polished set of hundreds) is that chasing the 'latest thing' in the automotive state of the art is a fool's errand. I prefer the personal triumph of driving something that's not-quite-in-fashion now, and will be not-quite-in-fashion ten years from now, like the C4S I now drive, and the TR6 I hope to add.
They are the khaki slacks/tasseled loafers/tortoise shell eyeglass frames of sports cars; never in; never out. To each his own.

If you drive a 1973 Mustang with a supercharger sticking out the hood and believe it to be a 'sportscar': God love you, wear your seat belts, and enjoy.
Old 11-21-2016, 08:36 AM
  #55  
Grunty
Burning Brakes
 
Grunty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Pretty sure I don't want a sportscar. I really love driving track cars, but I wouldn't want one as a car to drive regularly.
i think the 911, boxster and cayman do a fine job of being very comfortable, reasonably practical and most of all, fun.
Old 11-21-2016, 08:56 AM
  #56  
chuckbdc
Race Car
 
chuckbdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 3,591
Received 320 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fast1
The answer as to what a sports car is has become blurred over the decades. If you go back to the 60s and 70s, it was quite easy. There were cars that were designed for your basic transportation (basically appliances), there were luxury cars, and then there were sports cars. Everyone knew what the sports cars were in the early 70s: 911, Corvette, Ferrari, Triumph, MG, and a few others. They were spartan cars that were designed primarily for track use but were street legal.

In 2016 the definition of a sports car is a lot more complex. The definition of what a sports car is reminds me of the debate in the Supreme Court over the definition of pornography. Probably the best answer was offered by Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart : “I know it when I see it”.

So using the “I know it when I see it” model, ole timers like me, my first 911 was purchased in 1970, have a hard time looking at a 911 with full leather, power seats, automatic transmission, Bose stereo, power everything, navigation, etc as a sports car; GT car yes, sports car no. My 2250 lb 1970 911 had a MT, AM radio, and a heater. Lincolns and Cadillacs had all the "goodies" and were over double the size of my 911.

Having said this I have no problem if a 991 owner with all the luxury options, believes he is driving a sports car. Even though his hands stay warm in the winter because he has a heated steering wheel, and his butt stays warm with the heated seats, if he thinks he is driving a sports car, what's the harm.
Actually, this is my 4th 911 since the early 1970s. I think it is the best sports car I have ever owned, superior in every way to the 78SC I tracked for 30 years, even with the seats being cooled and heated. I find it every bit as involving, just at higher speeds.

If I wanted less handling, more drifting at lower speeds, I would have a Miata. Hell, the spec Miata's are as fast as half the 911s that show up at drivers ed. The "showroom stock" 280Z I raced in the early '80s was as fast as any well prepped semi stock 911 of the day. OK it was VERY WELL prepped. When the engine is swapped around so its in the middle, like the latest 911 race car, it will be an even better sports car.
Old 11-21-2016, 02:23 PM
  #57  
911sccab
Racer
 
911sccab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 404
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BertoneBertoni
Now that really is cruel......
Function triumphs over form....as any keen follower of Bauhaus or, indeed, Ferdinand Porsche will attest to. But copying a '67 Targa design seems to sweep under the carpet the historical fact that the 'Targa' was only brought in for increasingly stringent roll-over regs in the US...not because the designers thought whacking on a massive roll-over hoop on a cabrio was aesthetically appealing...

I'm sorry..... but the 991 Targa is turning Porsche design principles on its head: form over function. Now, centuwions, welease the Targa Hate Mail....
Hmm. I walked out of my office last Thursday... weather was sunny but temp was only 46 degrees. With the touch of a button and 23 odd seconds, I'm sitting cozy with the top open, the windows up, and ready to go.

That's function. It's got nothing to do with 1967, but I do love the historical link. I have convertibles and love them... but it's pretty hard to be cozy in a convertible on a 46 degree day. Convertibles also torture my wife's long curly hair... the Targa doesn't. And after a long day of sitting in my chair and talking on my phone, would I really have the energy to manually remove and stow a top? I doubt I'd bother. The Targa is actually all about function, it just does it with great form... as a Porsche should.

So the Targa, especially with the top open and the sounds from the pipes rising and falling as I shift through the gears, brings me more Sports Car experience on my drives than an admittedly more hardcore PDK Coupe ever would.

Oh, and if the Jenson Interceptor was 440 4-speed... I'd happily consider that too!
Old 11-21-2016, 02:38 PM
  #58  
NoGaBiker
Drifting
 
NoGaBiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Midtown Atlanta
Posts: 3,390
Received 233 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911sccab
Oh, and if the Jenson Interceptor was 440 4-speed... I'd happily consider that too!
If I recall correctly, though a 4M was available, that was only in the first year and a tiny number (20? 25? 50?) were built with a manual. The vast majority were 3 speed Torqueflight automatics. In 383, 440, or 360 flavor.

All were... umm... rather unfortunately styled.
Old 11-21-2016, 03:01 PM
  #59  
The Fat Kid
Pro
 
The Fat Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

The 991 is more like a sporty minivan...


Old 11-21-2016, 03:40 PM
  #60  
2012Neunelf
Intermediate
 
2012Neunelf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

180 laps on Nurburgring, track days at Spa, Le Mans and Hockenhiemring, YES its a sports car...and i have the 991 3.4L


Quick Reply: Is the 991.1/2 a sportscar anymore...?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:26 AM.