Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Targa 4 or 4S?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2016, 11:53 AM
  #31  
JW911
Three Wheelin'
 
JW911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Central Massachusetts
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
Received 353 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

You don't want to spend the next four years driving around with S envy do you?

Sure, you don't really need that extra HP and braking capability, but you will have regrets if you don't.
Old 10-14-2016, 12:33 PM
  #32  
go.illini
Pro
 
go.illini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: central IL
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

^^^ Disagree. The only ones who suffer S envy are those who spend too much time worrying about what other people think.
Old 10-14-2016, 12:58 PM
  #33  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,268
Received 2,284 Likes on 1,047 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by go.illini
^^^ Disagree. The only ones who suffer S envy are those who spend too much time worrying about what other people think.

+1
Old 10-14-2016, 12:59 PM
  #34  
blackbull
Racer
 
blackbull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

What about PDCC...is that a worthwhile option?
Old 10-14-2016, 01:43 PM
  #35  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,879 Likes on 1,904 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by go.illini
^^^ Disagree. The only ones who suffer S envy are those who spend too much time worrying about what other people think.
Until you drive one. Then the envy is real. IMO, the key is never to drive a more powerful version of any car you own.

Though on the turbo, given the torque curve, I think the envy will be very small.
Old 10-14-2016, 01:44 PM
  #36  
pfbz
Rennlist Member
 
pfbz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: US
Posts: 7,721
Received 2,886 Likes on 1,535 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blackbull
What about PDCC...is that a worthwhile option?
Very mixed reviews on PDCC.... Many complain about it creating a very 'artificial' handling feel, but it does allow you to corner with hugely reduced body roll without a punishingly stiff suspension.
Old 10-14-2016, 01:51 PM
  #37  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,879 Likes on 1,904 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blackbull
What about PDCC...is that a worthwhile option?
I love it on my C2S, but it does take some getting used to, because the car corners so flat. Now that I'm used to it, it would almost be a must have for me on a new car. The real benefit, at least on a SPASM car, is that it uses softer sway bars, which results in a nicer ride when you're going straight.
Old 10-14-2016, 02:00 PM
  #38  
Keadog
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Keadog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,995
Received 1,144 Likes on 688 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blackbull
What about PDCC...is that a worthwhile option?
I'm not ordering it. I drive at 1/10 99% of the time.
Old 10-14-2016, 02:07 PM
  #39  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,268
Received 2,284 Likes on 1,047 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Keadog
I'm not ordering it. I drive at 1/10 99% of the time.


I agree. PDCC, PTV, RWS, PASM is just not worth it for 99.9% of drivers.


I would get the PTV just for the LSD driving in snow but that is about it. The other "performance options" if you can call them that are really for other purposes:


SPASM - Aesthetics
PSE - Sound
SC - For the rev matching with MT or G-force meter for the brag and gimmick factor.
Old 10-14-2016, 02:39 PM
  #40  
go.illini
Pro
 
go.illini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: central IL
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by subshooter
I would get the PTV just for the LSD driving in snow but that is about it.
Not sure PTV is really necessary since base 4 comes standard with Automatic Brake Differential and Porsche Traction Management. PTV is more for improving high speed cornering dynamics which most normal humans would not be doing in the snow/ice. If you think you need it though, then definitely get it.
Old 10-14-2016, 02:44 PM
  #41  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,268
Received 2,284 Likes on 1,047 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by go.illini
Not sure PTV is really necessary since base 4 comes standard with Automatic Brake Differential and Porsche Traction Management. PTV is more for improving high speed cornering dynamics which most normal humans would not be doing in the snow/ice. If you think you need it though, then definitely get it.
I agree it's not necessary but it's more than just for high speed cornering with the Limited Slip Differential:

Porsche Torque Vectoring (PTV)

"Includes:
  • Variable torque distribution through controlled braking on the rear wheels
  • Mechanically controlled differential lock with asymmetrical locking action (22% in traction, 27% in overrun) for increased agility, steering precision, traction, and vehicle stability"
Old 10-14-2016, 02:56 PM
  #42  
go.illini
Pro
 
go.illini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: central IL
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I saw that, but I am interpreting what you bolded to mean in high speed situations since ABD and PTM are covering low-traction situations already.

From the owner's manual is where my reasoning comes from. It refers to increased lateral acceleration, limiting understeer, and higher cornering speeds. Not clear which system would intervene first in snow/ice/rain conditions but I lean towards ABD and PTM in those situations. I could be wrong.
Vehicles with manual transmission:
Porsche Torque Vectoring (PTV)
PTV consists of a control system for drivingdynamics relevant brake interventions enabling variable drive-torque distribution at the rear axle and a mechanical rear-axle differential lock.

By using gentle braking interventions that are imperceptible to the driver at the rear wheel on the inside of the bend, PTV improves steering performance and steering precision. The vehicle follows the steering angle of the front wheels more precisely. Understeer is largely prevented in the limit range. This increases the lateral acceleration potential and higher cornering speeds are possible.

The mechanical rear-axle differential lock improves traction in the event of wheel spin.

It reduces load alteration effects during rapid cornering and increases driving stability at higher speeds.

Vehicles with Porsche Doppelkupplung:
Porsche Torque Vectoring Plus (PTV Plus)
PTV Plus consists of a control system that performs braking interventions based on driving dynamics to achieve variable drive torque distribution on the rear axle and of an electronically controlled rear differential lock.

PTV Plus improves steering response and precision through gentle braking interventions on the inside rear wheel. This braking action cannot be felt by the driver. The vehicle follows the steering angle of the front wheels more precisely.

Understeer is largely prevented in the limit range. This increases the lateral acceleration potential and higher cornering speeds are possible.

The electronically controlled rear differential lock continuously monitors the driving condition of the vehicle and distributes the drive torque to the rear axle as required.

This has the following advantages:
– Improved traction.
– Reduced load change responses when cornering at speed.
– Improved driving stability at higher speeds.

PTV Plus changes to a more dynamic map when "Sport Plus" is switched on.
Old 10-14-2016, 03:07 PM
  #43  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,879 Likes on 1,904 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by subshooter
I agree. PDCC, PTV, RWS, PASM is just not worth it for 99.9% of drivers.


I would get the PTV just for the LSD driving in snow but that is about it. The other "performance options" if you can call them that are really for other purposes:


SPASM - Aesthetics
SC - For the rev matching with MT or G-force meter for the brag and gimmick factor.
Both nonsense. SPASM provides different suspension dynamics that many people, myself included, much preferred over PASM, at least in the .1. The aesthetic side is personal preference, but the performance difference was very real. Based on my test drive of a base .2, I think Porsche may have improved the suspension such that said gap may be diminished or eliminated, but I'd need more seat time in both to really form an opinion.

As far as sport chrono goes, the dynamic engine mounts you get with the Sport Chrono package are anything but a gimmick. I would never spec a Carrera without SC.

And I would definitely spec PTV in a 4wd car one intends to drive in traction limited situations, such as winter snow. But of course, it's not required. None of this stuff is required, though being chincy on a car to get a build down from $140k to $130k seems kinda dumb to me, at least when the difference are real performance options, not leather shift *****.

I'm guessing you don't drive your cars very hard and assume that 99.9% of other Porsche owners do the same.
Old 10-14-2016, 03:27 PM
  #44  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,268
Received 2,284 Likes on 1,047 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by go.illini
"The mechanical rear-axle differential lock improves traction in the event of wheel spin."

This is exactly what I am talking about. For me, my C4 or T4 is going to be a winter commuting car so I want a 4 and PTV.

Originally Posted by Archimedes
Both nonsense. SPASM provides different suspension dynamics that many people, myself included, much preferred over PASM, at least in the .1. The aesthetic side is personal preference, but the performance difference was very real. Based on my test drive of a base .2, I think Porsche may have improved the suspension such that said gap may be diminished or eliminated, but I'd need more seat time in both to really form an opinion.

As far as sport chrono goes, the dynamic engine mounts you get with the Sport Chrono package are anything but a gimmick. I would never spec a Carrera without SC.

And I would definitely spec PTV in a 4wd car one intends to drive in traction limited situations, such as winter snow. But of course, it's not required. None of this stuff is required, though being chincy on a car to get a build down from $140k to $130k seems kinda dumb to me, at least when the difference are real performance options, not leather shift *****.

I'm guessing you don't drive your cars very hard and assume that 99.9% of other Porsche owners do the same.

Yeah I get all that. I would LOVE to take 100 average 911 drivers and ask them to drive a car with and without engine mounts and see if they can really notice. The majority can't detect these differences except on internet forums.
Old 10-14-2016, 03:32 PM
  #45  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,879 Likes on 1,904 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by subshooter
Yeah I get all that. I would LOVE to take 100 average 911 drivers and ask them to drive a car with and without engine mounts and see if they can really notice. The majority can't detect these differences except on internet forums.
You can absolutely tell the first time you take a tight corner hard. Just like you can easily tell the difference between PASM and SPASM and between PDCC and non-PDCC and between PCCBs and iron rotors. They all have a very real impact on the handling and performance of the car. Not for everyone, but none of them are gimmicks.


Quick Reply: Targa 4 or 4S?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:24 PM.