Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: PDCC ?
Yes
45
49.45%
No
46
50.55%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll

PDCC Poll

Old Jan 1, 2016 | 08:08 PM
  #31  
MagicRat's Avatar
MagicRat
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 799
Likes: 10
From: London
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
Did the .2 have RWS?
Yes. I liked it.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2016 | 09:02 PM
  #32  
Larry Cable's Avatar
Larry Cable
Team Owner
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 26,113
Likes: 3,865
From: S.F Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by worf928
Just in case some folks don't recognize hyperbole, PDCC doesn't result in a "Lincoln Town Car" ride. When driving on crappy roads it takes the edge off. That's it. The rest of the suspension is just as stiff as it would otherwise be.
It was nothing more than a humorous remark ... Clearly you had a probelm spotting that
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 03:42 AM
  #33  
Michael_s's Avatar
Michael_s
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 877
Likes: 56
From: Tennessee
Default

Small sample but I'm surprised how many PDCC cars. I bet it goes down.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 04:30 AM
  #34  
Drifting's Avatar
Drifting
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 7,091
Likes: 2,936
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by MagicRat
I have PDCC on my GTS, having driven cars with and without it at Silverstone. On the track I loved it - definitely allowed me to corner more quickly. It's also great for high-intensity driving on the road; you can do things that normal physics would dictate you shouldn't be able to do.

But there is something a little odd to me about that. I'm not a track guy, I'm a road guy who likes a feeling of total connection to whatever I'm driving or riding. When I test drove the 991.2, which didn't have PDCC (and I know it has improved suspension etc etc so not a strictly fair comparison), I felt I could corner much more intuitively and was aware of what the car was doing more exactly than I am in my own car.
Exactly, PDCC produces a quicker yet more artificial drive.

I chose no.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 01:37 PM
  #35  
Archimedes's Avatar
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Likes: 3,919
Default

Given all PDCC is essentially doing is eliminating body roll, which is what most race car suspensions strive to do as well, I'm not sure why people call it artificial. I think it's simply because people aren't used to driving a car with that low a level of body roll. Personally, whether the car does it by using passive suspension components that rattle my teeth out or active suspension technology that manages to deliver a decent ride while also cornering dead flat, doesn't make either natural or artificial. Just different technology achieving the same goal.

My X73 Cayman corners pretty flat. My PDCC Carrera just corners a little flatter. Doesn't feel artificial, just more aggressive in the corners and more planted to the road. Unusual? Yes, because few street cars have that low a level of body roll. Artificial? Nah.

The most positive aspect of PDCC is the sense of immense corner grip when you're driving the car spiritedly.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 01:42 PM
  #36  
BradB's Avatar
BradB
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 46
From: St. Louis
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
Given all PDCC is essentially doing is eliminating body roll, which is what most race car suspensions strive to do as well, I'm not sure why people call it artificial. I think it's simply because people aren't used to driving a car with that low a level of body roll. Personally, whether the car does it by using passive suspension components that rattle my teeth out or active suspension technology that manages to deliver a decent ride while also cornering dead flat, doesn't make either natural or artificial. Just different technology achieving the same goal.

My X73 Cayman corners pretty flat. My PDCC Carrera just corners a little flatter. Doesn't feel artificial, just more aggressive in the corners and more planted to the road. Unusual? Yes, because few street cars have that low a level of body roll. Artificial? Nah.

The most positive aspect of PDCC is the sense of immense corner grip when you're driving the car spiritedly.
Well stated. I totally agree.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 04:15 PM
  #37  
Drifting's Avatar
Drifting
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 7,091
Likes: 2,936
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
Given all PDCC is essentially doing is eliminating body roll, which is what most race car suspensions strive to do as well, I'm not sure why people call it artificial. I think it's simply because people aren't used to driving a car with that low a level of body roll. Personally, whether the car does it by using passive suspension components that rattle my teeth out or active suspension technology that manages to deliver a decent ride while also cornering dead flat, doesn't make either natural or artificial. Just different technology achieving the same goal.

My X73 Cayman corners pretty flat. My PDCC Carrera just corners a little flatter. Doesn't feel artificial, just more aggressive in the corners and more planted to the road. Unusual? Yes, because few street cars have that low a level of body roll. Artificial? Nah.

The most positive aspect of PDCC is the sense of immense corner grip when you're driving the car spiritedly.
to each his own but I disagree

My GT3 achieves more grip, and is better planted to the road while still feeling much more natural than a Carrera with PDDC. Yes I've driven both.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 04:54 PM
  #38  
Archimedes's Avatar
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Likes: 3,919
Default

Originally Posted by Drifting
to each his own but I disagree My GT3 achieves more grip, and is better planted to the road while still feeling much more natural than a Carrera with PDDC. Yes I've driven both.
Again, apples to oranges, with too many variables in play.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 05:22 PM
  #39  
CSK 911 C4S's Avatar
CSK 911 C4S
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 4,182
Likes: 1,033
From: Dickson, TN
Default

Oh No.....

Almost 50/50.

Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 05:42 PM
  #40  
Hothonda's Avatar
Hothonda
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 34
From: PNW
Default

Off topic slightly:

On Land Cruisers they have the opposite & call it KDSS....(Kinetic Dynamic Suspension System)

"The KDSS System is a Hydro-Mechanical Semi-Active anti-roll bar"

The bars disengage when the going gets tough... more wheel travel allowed.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 09:48 PM
  #41  
pap2828's Avatar
pap2828
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Default

had it on 2 cars and would keep ordering it....
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2016 | 01:24 PM
  #42  
mgflyfish's Avatar
mgflyfish
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 251
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
Given all PDCC is essentially doing is eliminating body roll, which is what most race car suspensions strive to do as well, I'm not sure why people call it artificial. I think it's simply because people aren't used to driving a car with that low a level of body roll. Personally, whether the car does it by using passive suspension components that rattle my teeth out or active suspension technology that manages to deliver a decent ride while also cornering dead flat, doesn't make either natural or artificial. Just different technology achieving the same goal.

My X73 Cayman corners pretty flat. My PDCC Carrera just corners a little flatter. Doesn't feel artificial, just more aggressive in the corners and more planted to the road. Unusual? Yes, because few street cars have that low a level of body roll. Artificial? Nah.

The most positive aspect of PDCC is the sense of immense corner grip when you're driving the car spiritedly.
+10--exactly different does not = artificial--otherwise power windows would be unnatural--
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2016 | 06:06 PM
  #43  
Larry Cable's Avatar
Larry Cable
Team Owner
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 26,113
Likes: 3,865
From: S.F Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by Hothonda
Off topic slightly:

On Land Cruisers they have the opposite & call it KDSS....(Kinetic Dynamic Suspension System)

"The KDSS System is a Hydro-Mechanical Semi-Active anti-roll bar"

The bars disengage when the going gets tough... more wheel travel allowed.
that's pretty much what PDCC is ... including the disengagement while driving in a straight line...
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2016 | 06:06 PM
  #44  
Larry Cable's Avatar
Larry Cable
Team Owner
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 26,113
Likes: 3,865
From: S.F Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by MagicRat
Yes. I liked it.
probably explains some of the cornering experiences ...
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2016 | 07:48 PM
  #45  
justabout's Avatar
justabout
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,726
Likes: 467
Default

The selling point for me is allowing the suspension to work indepedently when not cor. At high speeds over bumpy roads, the ride is more settled. It also reduces the tendency for the wheel and car to drop into the pothole. I have had 2 Panameras, one with pdcc and one without. For heavy vehicles it seems to make a significant difference. I ordered it on a 991 GTS because of my prior experience with the Panny but I haven't tracked it and
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:59 AM.