Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Porsche's U.S. Patent for 991.2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2014, 01:58 PM
  #16  
MKW
Rennlist Member
 
MKW's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Palo Alto and Carnelian Bay/Lk Tahoe
Posts: 1,579
Received 63 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
be interesting to see how they roll this out through the Boxster/Cayman, 911 and 911S ranges...
Their marketing folks will not lose sleep over this ...they will simply label all the forced induction motors as " turbocharged " , and like some have stated , the " Turbo " , will as always , continue as the top 911 grand touring model series .

Since everyone and their mothers are selling all sorts of supercharged and turbocharged motors now , from econoboxes to regular production Ferraris , the consumer , esp for 911s , will figure it out in no time.

The concern should be over the SOUND of these new motors, as we know from the Turbo, the boxer motor does not take kindly to it , even with aftermarket mufflers which only amplifies its vacuum cleaner whoosh ,but comes nowhere near making it sound like a normally aspirated GT3 or GT3RS
Old 10-13-2014, 02:04 PM
  #17  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,556
Received 3,457 Likes on 2,260 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sharm
If this is true, pardon my ignorance, but how would Porsche distinguish the 991.2 turbo from the base Carreras? Would it just come down to simple hp difference and the xtra goodies on the side for the turbo, or maybe the 991.2 turbos would go hybrid?
Like they have done with the Macan, a badge and more HP ... I doubt they will go hybrid (in this generation of the 911)
Old 10-13-2014, 02:43 PM
  #18  
petee1997
Burning Brakes
 
petee1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ontario,Canada
Posts: 889
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Expect to see smaller displacement TT engines for greater fuel efficiency by 2017 deadline. Actually, Porsche is behind the curve on this one. Even Ford is going 3.0L V6TT as their main engine for their all new aluminum body pick up. Most MB cars are now TT.
Old 10-13-2014, 02:52 PM
  #19  
timothymoffat
Rennlist Member
 
timothymoffat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rainforest (Vancouver, BC)
Posts: 7,518
Received 988 Likes on 437 Posts
Default

What bothers me most about this trend to smaller displacement, turbocharged engines is that it's driven by the need to meet emissions and fuel economy tests. These new engines do very well in these very structured laboratory tests. Funny thing is, much of the time this DOES NOT transfer into real world driving situations. The smaller "more efficient" motor can drink just as much fuel if not more than the motors they replace.
Old 10-13-2014, 03:04 PM
  #20  
MKW
Rennlist Member
 
MKW's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Palo Alto and Carnelian Bay/Lk Tahoe
Posts: 1,579
Received 63 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by timothymoffat
What bothers me most about this trend to smaller displacement, turbocharged engines is that it's driven by the need to meet emissions and fuel economy tests. These new engines do very well in these very structured laboratory tests. Funny thing is, much of the time this DOES NOT transfer into real world driving situations. The smaller "more efficient" motor can drink just as much fuel if not more than the motors they replace.
anecdotal of course, but I have heard from a several friends that the 2 liter 4cyl turbo motors on their German commute cars got noticeably lower real world MPG than the stated EPA numbers when driven " normally " to keep up with typical urban slice and dice traffic , whereas their previous larger displacement normally aspirated commute cars pretty much got EPA numbers

not related to boxer engines, but all the trendy 2 liter turbo motors that I've listened to from the German big three have that farty " putt -putt -putt" rental car idle sound also.
Old 10-13-2014, 03:17 PM
  #21  
disden
Drifting
 
disden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,449
Received 966 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

Just from personal experience, my real world driving mpg in my new Panamera V6 turbo vs my previous V8 Panamera is identical; I miss the sound and rumble of the V8, strikingly different driving the two
Old 10-13-2014, 04:09 PM
  #22  
mtbscott
Burning Brakes
 
mtbscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Only a couple of you have hit on the real reason for these upcoming turbocharged motors, meeting fuel economy standards.
I thought it was bizarre when 2.0L 4 cylinder turbo motors started showing up in $40K entry level luxury cars, but now it's the norm. Now while I have not owned one of these type cars, I have had some as either rental or loaner cars and my anecdotal evidence is not like what others have mentioned.
I had a couple of A4's with 2.0's as loaners when I had a TT-RS and although they are "entry level" they are not small cars. They actually got pretty good mileage (25mpg or better) for what they were, and add in some highway cruising and 30+ was attainable.
Like it or not, this is the future. As I understand CAFE standards, you can still sell some gas guzzlers as long as you sell enough eco-cars to make up for them.
I do agree that the sound of a turbo-muffled 4 banger will never live up to the growl of the flat six.
Old 10-13-2014, 04:32 PM
  #23  
disden
Drifting
 
disden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,449
Received 966 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

If it was only about the mpg then they would be cranking out more diesels; great torque and mpg. My wife loves her Cayenne diesel, she never has to put fuel in that thing. I would get a Panamera diesel in a heartbeat. Hopefully with all the cayennes, Macans they are cranking out the flat 6 in the 911 can be spared.
Old 10-14-2014, 01:06 AM
  #24  
GreenLantern
Rennlist Member
 
GreenLantern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SFO, LAX, SJC, SNA, LAS, IAH, JFK
Posts: 2,845
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sharm
If this is true, pardon my ignorance, but how would Porsche distinguish the 991.2 turbo from the base Carreras? Would it just come down to simple hp difference and the xtra goodies on the side for the turbo, or maybe the 991.2 turbos would go hybrid?
Same way they distinguish the Macan S and the Macan Turbo, both feature turbo engines.
Old 10-14-2014, 01:08 AM
  #25  
GreenLantern
Rennlist Member
 
GreenLantern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SFO, LAX, SJC, SNA, LAS, IAH, JFK
Posts: 2,845
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by disden
If it was only about the mpg then they would be cranking out more diesels; great torque and mpg. My wife loves her Cayenne diesel, she never has to put fuel in that thing. I would get a Panamera diesel in a heartbeat. Hopefully with all the cayennes, Macans they are cranking out the flat 6 in the 911 can be spared.
Yeah, it's about balancing mpg and fun. They can definitely make a diesel fun (look to Audi and Le Mans for an example), but no one in the US (except three and a half of us) would buy a diesel 911.
Old 10-14-2014, 01:33 AM
  #26  
Key Left
Pro
 
Key Left's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saratoga Springs, NY
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I wonder if the 991.2's will have the four-wheel steering to soften the turbo throttle lag effect, and minimize the torque steer in four wheel drive variants?
Old 10-14-2014, 03:03 AM
  #27  
coxswain
Racer
Thread Starter
 
coxswain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Chicago
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If 991.2 will be the beginning of the all turbo-charged era for 911, then 991GTS is to be the last product of the naturally-aspirated engine era. This GTS has a sort of added historical significance, I guess.
Old 10-14-2014, 01:46 PM
  #28  
Key Left
Pro
 
Key Left's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saratoga Springs, NY
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by coxswain
If 991.2 will be the beginning of the all turbo-charged era for 911, then 991GTS is to be the last product of the naturally-aspirated engine era. This GTS has a sort of added historical significance, I guess.
Very good point....a new collectable is born.
Old 10-14-2014, 01:59 PM
  #29  
MKW
Rennlist Member
 
MKW's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Palo Alto and Carnelian Bay/Lk Tahoe
Posts: 1,579
Received 63 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Key Left
Very good point....a new collectable is born.

the GT3 RS 4.0 from just three model years ago is now in the $375 -500k range , double what they sold for new , but it was the last of the legendary Mezger engined 911s , which the the 991 GT3 range does not have and which Porsche will not dare to race , so am not sure they will be worth much, even being possibly last of non turbos..or Porsche may cont to produce them as the only non turbo cars going forward, since their volumes are so low , which will result in current 991 GT3 depreciating as before
Old 10-14-2014, 03:10 PM
  #30  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,556
Received 3,457 Likes on 2,260 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Key Left
Very good point....a new collectable is born.
+1


Quick Reply: Porsche's U.S. Patent for 991.2



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:45 AM.