Pretty Good Tripod Test
#31
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
Good position for highlighting scenery, but I prefer through the windshield centered so the relationship of hands on steering wheel and wheel position to road features are foremost (and tach/speedo views being bonus points to promote viewer attention in that they are such familiar cues for all Porsche drivers).
For scenery drives my favorite is a position that gets the viewer into the 911 drivers head as well, like the following, where there is no question of the, er, bull involved:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9tzg...ayer_embedded#!
For scenery drives my favorite is a position that gets the viewer into the 911 drivers head as well, like the following, where there is no question of the, er, bull involved:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9tzg...ayer_embedded#!
- Elevated position. Great sense of surroundings and better view, better imagery for hanging a screenshot on the wall. Flattens the corners though. Look back at the first test, or notice the amount of steering angle I'm cranking in, to remember how sharp those turns are on that road.
- Eye-level mount. Feels like sitting in the back seat. Which improves our judgment of the cornering involved because we are used to that eye level. Also lets the rear-view mirror, the A pillar, and the windshield top rail block a lot of the scenery, including subtle details like an approaching motorcycle. Claustrophobic, just like the real back seat of a Carrera.
- Shoulder-level? Remains to be seen. Will attempt a test this weekend if the weather holds. I'm thinking behind the passenger's shoulder position, which will look past the rear-view mirror, across the instrument panel, and provide the driver's actions as well as most of the view forward.
Some half-decent video editor for cuts and blends, and two or three little cameras, would let me combine the sense of vehicle surroundings with the visual experience of going over a ridge at 110 mph with no track surface in sight. And the more tame versions on public roads.
Back to reality for a few hours. Errands to run.
Gary
#32
Race Car
#33
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
Gary, who spent three years in Duluth and some time even further toward the Arctic
#34
Gary I have an off topic question. I am looking at the gopro black for similar purposes to yours and to capture a golf swing at a high frame rate. 60 fps is not high for a golf swing 120 or 240 is more appropriate. Current deals giveaway a remote with the purchase. Did you get that deal? How does that remote work at night frame rates a slow remote is painful in viewing high frame rates. Have you sampled the higher fare rates?
Thanks Blll
Thanks Blll
#35
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
Gary I have an off topic question. I am looking at the gopro black for similar purposes to yours and to capture a golf swing at a high frame rate. 60 fps is not high for a golf swing 120 or 240 is more appropriate. Current deals giveaway a remote with the purchase. Did you get that deal? How does that remote work at night frame rates a slow remote is painful in viewing high frame rates. Have you sampled the higher fare rates?
Thanks Blll
Thanks Blll
I was planning to work on the camera and put some mounts on the car tomorrow. (Play with it, in other words.) I might as well try some high-speed work and see it looks. I'll try a few golf swings and some other stuff like falling objects and we'll see how the Black does.
Gary