Anyone have the RR Racing Coilover kit?
#16
The following users liked this post:
MingusDew (07-05-2024)
#17
Installed but haven’t driven it yet. Made some other changes (Tarett LCAs and adjustable tie rods). Getting aligned and corner balanced next week and will report back after. Went with the middle option which are 300/600.
Fronts are Eibach J/N 0700.250.0300
Rears are Eibach H/X 0700.250.0600
I’ll take some pics when back at the car. Install was fairly straightforward outside the expected and minor wrestling match getting towers in/out.
Fronts are Eibach J/N 0700.250.0300
Rears are Eibach H/X 0700.250.0600
I’ll take some pics when back at the car. Install was fairly straightforward outside the expected and minor wrestling match getting towers in/out.
SPASM which is standard on GTS is 33/108. So your setup is midly better. A tiny bit better. If you want to make it substantially better, without changing both, just increase the front a little more.
80/110 won't be any stiffer than what you have now. But it will handle considerably better.
in your speak, it will be 450/600. 1:2 ratio (300/600) is not a high performance setup for this car. Springs are cheap. swap out those fronts for some 80's (450) and then you'll be cooking with gas.
If you want GT3 type handling you'll need 100/140 minimum. ( 570/800)
992 GT3 for comparison are 570/915 (100/160) I only put the comparison so you understand how extremely conservative you have been.
Last edited by 4 Point 0; 07-04-2024 at 11:07 PM.
#18
Congrats. 300/600 converts to 52/105 (Clearly they rounded off. So most likely you have 50/110) 50/110 is what Ohlins or B16 are offering.
SPASM which is standard on GTS is 33/108. So your setup is midly better. A tiny bit better. If you want to make it substantially better, without changing both, just increase the front a little more.
80/110 won't be any stiffer than what you have now. But it will handle considerably better.
in your speak, it will be 450/600. 1:2 ratio (300/600) is not a high performance setup for this car. Springs are cheap. swap out those fronts for some 80's (450) and then you'll be cooking with gas.
If you want GT3 type handling you'll need 100/140 minimum. ( 570/800)
992 GT3 for comparison are 570/915 (100/160) I only put the comparison so you understand how extremely conservative you have been.
SPASM which is standard on GTS is 33/108. So your setup is midly better. A tiny bit better. If you want to make it substantially better, without changing both, just increase the front a little more.
80/110 won't be any stiffer than what you have now. But it will handle considerably better.
in your speak, it will be 450/600. 1:2 ratio (300/600) is not a high performance setup for this car. Springs are cheap. swap out those fronts for some 80's (450) and then you'll be cooking with gas.
If you want GT3 type handling you'll need 100/140 minimum. ( 570/800)
992 GT3 for comparison are 570/915 (100/160) I only put the comparison so you understand how extremely conservative you have been.
One thing I’ve yet to do in this phase is upgrade roll bars. Is that worthwhile in your view @4 Point 0 ?
#19
This is great context. Thank you. I’ve followed your .2 build and will likely go full Tractive someday but will swap to the stiffer springs per your suggestion - they are cheap.
One thing I’ve yet to do in this phase is upgrade roll bars. Is that worthwhile in your view @4 Point 0 ?
One thing I’ve yet to do in this phase is upgrade roll bars. Is that worthwhile in your view @4 Point 0 ?
Remember above i said 1:2 was a bad ratio for this platform? I had 75/150 which is 1:2 and when i added stiffer anti-sway bars i lost drive out of the corners. Meaning the rear would start spinning.
i upgrade the front to 100, which restored drive at 100/150.
The following users liked this post:
prsmithjr (07-05-2024)
#20
Has anyone researched the maximum spring rate the OEM dampers can handle? Can I assume the GT3 dampers are designed for GT3 spring rates and lower models may not be?
It will get to a point where the band-aid of these lowering kits will reach their limits on the OEM damper and have to go Tractive (to keep electronics) or Ohlins or ??? (Other high end coil over).
my assumptions correct?
It will get to a point where the band-aid of these lowering kits will reach their limits on the OEM damper and have to go Tractive (to keep electronics) or Ohlins or ??? (Other high end coil over).
my assumptions correct?
#21
Yes it is, however you need a stiffer front end first.
Remember above i said 1:2 was a bad ratio for this platform? I had 75/150 which is 1:2 and when i added stiffer anti-sway bars i lost drive out of the corners. Meaning the rear would start spinning.
i upgrade the front to 100, which restored drive at 100/150.
Remember above i said 1:2 was a bad ratio for this platform? I had 75/150 which is 1:2 and when i added stiffer anti-sway bars i lost drive out of the corners. Meaning the rear would start spinning.
i upgrade the front to 100, which restored drive at 100/150.
The following users liked this post:
Cltbread (09-12-2024)