Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991.2 GTS wheel offset

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2022 | 06:58 PM
  #1  
mrneef's Avatar
mrneef
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 83
Likes: 37
Default 991.2 GTS wheel offset

Would these work for my 991.2 GTS?

Can get a really good deal on some wheels that are 20x9 in the front with a ET47 and a 20x12 ET45

I was told front
9's +52 and rear 12's +44 is ideal...


OEM suspension but I do plan on doing the Blistein coil over set up.

Thanks all
Old 02-01-2022 | 07:39 PM
  #2  
isugoo's Avatar
isugoo
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 281
From: Orange County, CA
Default

In my understanding, our .2 GTS center lock offsets are: 20x9 ET 51, 20x12 ET 63
So ET52 on 9" wheels will be 1 mm more tuck in than our stock and ET44 on 12 are typical .2 GT3 rear offset and it's going to be straight flush on the rear.
However 20x9 +47 (4 mm out from stock) and 20x12 +45 (18 mm out from the stock) seem pretty sweet stance on .2 GTS.
The following users liked this post:
4 Point 0 (02-02-2022)
Old 02-01-2022 | 11:09 PM
  #3  
NJ991's Avatar
NJ991
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 369
From: Northern NJ
Default

These wheels will be just fine. My wheels are 20x9 ET 40 and 20x12 ET47. I’m lowered, so they will tuck in a bit more as they go down. For me, it’s a flush and perfect fitment. The fronts of the wheels you are looking at will be 7mm more tucked in than mine, but they will fit just just fine. Rears are only 2mm pushed out than mine, barely of a change. Hope these pics help give you a good reference for your car.






The following users liked this post:
mrneef (02-02-2022)
Old 02-02-2022 | 04:25 AM
  #4  
4 Point 0's Avatar
4 Point 0
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 1,295
Default

Originally Posted by isugoo
In my understanding, our .2 GTS center lock offsets are: 20x9 ET 51, 20x12 ET 63
So ET52 on 9" wheels will be 1 mm more tuck in than our stock and ET44 on 12 are typical .2 GT3 rear offset and it's going to be straight flush on the rear.
However 20x9 +47 (4 mm out from stock) and 20x12 +45 (18 mm out from the stock) seem pretty sweet stance on .2 GTS.
I am wanting 20 x 9.5 ET 45 up front and have not bought BBS FI-R because can’t get this.

Guess what????

The new 992 BBS FI-R EVO are 20 x 9.5 ET 46. Near enough.

But rear are 21 x 12 ET 45. Don’t like 21 but may bave to as no one does a decent 20 x 12. Maybe 991.2 GT3?




FI-R EVO

Last edited by 4 Point 0; 02-02-2022 at 07:05 AM.
The following 3 users liked this post by 4 Point 0:
isugoo (02-02-2022), Mark Nuanual (02-03-2022), PorscheC2S (02-02-2022)
Old 02-02-2022 | 10:37 AM
  #5  
mrneef's Avatar
mrneef
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 83
Likes: 37
Default

Originally Posted by 4 Point 0
I am wanting 20 x 9.5 ET 45 up front and have not bought BBS FI-R because can’t get this.

Guess what????

The new 992 BBS FI-R EVO are 20 x 9.5 ET 46. Near enough.

But rear are 21 x 12 ET 45. Don’t like 21 but may bave to as no one does a decent 20 x 12. Maybe 991.2 GT3?




FI-R EVO
the EVO wheels are so nice.

I ended up getting the wheels and they are HRE P101. Was such a great deal but needed to confirm the offset worked.
Old 02-02-2022 | 12:41 PM
  #6  
rugu6869's Avatar
rugu6869
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 979
Likes: 474
From: Chester Springs, PA
Default

Originally Posted by 4 Point 0
I am wanting 20 x 9.5 ET 45 up front and have not bought BBS FI-R because can’t get this.

Guess what????

The new 992 BBS FI-R EVO are 20 x 9.5 ET 46. Near enough.

But rear are 21 x 12 ET 45. Don’t like 21 but may bave to as no one does a decent 20 x 12. Maybe 991.2 GT3?FI-R EVO
Litespeed racing has their RS5RR that can be done in whatever size and offset you'd want. So you could get your 20x9.5 ET45 up front and 20x12 et ? without a problem.

OP: FWIW, I'm running 20x9 ET45 up front on my C2 without any issues being lowered on Bilsteins as well. I upsized tires to 255/35 as well.
The following users liked this post:
LWG (02-02-2022)
Old 02-02-2022 | 01:57 PM
  #7  
LWG's Avatar
LWG
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 780
Likes: 641
From: Northern NJ
Default


20x9 ET 47 isnt bad up front but less than ideal if you want a flush look. Im running 35 and I feel it could still push out slightly. I am lowered with additional camber over stock though,
Old 02-02-2022 | 02:23 PM
  #8  
4 Point 0's Avatar
4 Point 0
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 1,295
Default

Originally Posted by LWG

20x9 ET 47 isnt bad up front but less than ideal if you want a flush look. Im running 35 and I feel it could still push out slightly. I am lowered with additional camber over stock though,
A 9.5 at et 46 will look like a 9 at 34? I have neg 4.4 front camber. I track a lot. 🤣

Last edited by 4 Point 0; 02-02-2022 at 02:42 PM.
Old 02-02-2022 | 02:27 PM
  #9  
LWG's Avatar
LWG
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 780
Likes: 641
From: Northern NJ
Default

Originally Posted by 4 Point 0
A 9.5 at et 46 will look like a 9 at 34. I have neg 4.4 front camber. I track a lot. 🤣
Thats a ton of camber!

9.5 at et 46 = to 9 at 40, not 34.

I love those EVO Fi-R but I dont think the fitments are optimized, especially if you run that much camber, But maybe you dont care about being hella flush? lol

Last edited by LWG; 02-02-2022 at 02:29 PM.
Old 02-02-2022 | 02:32 PM
  #10  
4 Point 0's Avatar
4 Point 0
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 1,295
Default

Originally Posted by LWG
Thats a ton of camber!

9.5 at et 46 = to 9 at 40, not 34.

I love those EVO Fi-R but I dont think the fitments are optimized, especially if you run that much camber, But maybe you dont care about being hella flush? lol


46 vs stock 51

Poking 11.4 mm




Old 02-02-2022 | 02:38 PM
  #11  
LWG's Avatar
LWG
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 780
Likes: 641
From: Northern NJ
Default

Originally Posted by 4 Point 0

46 vs stock 51

Poking 11.4 mm
Keep in mind you are also factoring tire size difference. If we are just referring to the wheel size, the .5" is equal to 6mm on the offset.

But yes the poke is 11mm more outward with those specs.
The following users liked this post:
4 Point 0 (02-02-2022)
Old 02-02-2022 | 02:40 PM
  #12  
4 Point 0's Avatar
4 Point 0
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 1,295
Default

Originally Posted by LWG
Keep in mind you are also factoring tire size difference. If we are just referring to the wheel size, the .5" is equal to 6mm on the offset.

But yes the poke is 11mm more outward with those specs.
I already run 265/35 on the stock 9. Wanting the 9.5
Old 02-02-2022 | 11:36 PM
  #13  
mrneef's Avatar
mrneef
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 83
Likes: 37
Default

Originally Posted by LWG

20x9 ET 47 isnt bad up front but less than ideal if you want a flush look. Im running 35 and I feel it could still push out slightly. I am lowered with additional camber over stock though,
this looks perfect for me. What are you running in back?

I was able to snag a set of Satin Black HRE P101 20x9 ET47 and 20x12 ET45 for $4k and only one wheel has a slight curb rash. So will send them to HRE for refinishing and color change for $1k.

Thanks for all the input guys.
Old 02-03-2022 | 02:17 AM
  #14  
Martin S.'s Avatar
Martin S.
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 9,622
Likes: 541
From: Solana Beach, CA
Default

Where does this lillle comparison table come from?

Old 02-03-2022 | 04:16 AM
  #15  
4 Point 0's Avatar
4 Point 0
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 1,295
Default

Originally Posted by Martin S.
Where does this lillle comparison table come from?

“Will They Fit” Calculator.
The following users liked this post:
isugoo (02-03-2022)



Quick Reply: 991.2 GTS wheel offset



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:52 AM.