Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Can 911s or any ICE “collectibles” maintain value?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2021, 08:22 PM
  #76  
visitador
Rennlist Member
 
visitador's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 1,757
Received 144 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

I guess I'll post it here. As of now, it looks like anything classic ICE that is viewed as collectible will maintain its value. Actually, any ICE with Porsche engineering, as shown by this BaT auction

https://bringatrailer.com/listing/19..._listing_ended

I was surprised at the price it fetched. I guess how often you get a MB with Porsche DNA
Old 02-06-2021, 12:59 PM
  #77  
fnckr
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
fnckr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Boonton Township, NJ
Posts: 761
Received 200 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911-TOUR
So - I've looked into the economics of this in depth as part of my day job. It turns out to be very hard to make *any* money selling electricity at the roadside. Capital costs are very high, and demand is very uncertain when everyone can fill up at home. It probably works for a large regional-, or national-scale network along interstates and major secondaries, but the mom-and-pop owned stations cannot make the numbers work.

Again, just my 2 bits.
What about the economics or profit potential of Big Oil shifting to industrial production and/or retail selling through of hydrogen and filling stations for hydrogen fuel cell or hydrogen powered cars?

The technology and adoption has lagged, in my opinion, because of the “sexiness” of Tesla driving EV popularity. This is inline with the post earlier about the “war” on ICE. It could be argued that hydrogen is a more convenient and closer to conventional store and use of energy than battery EVs. Thus, as the majority of the population begins to consider the real benefits and detriments of alternative energy transport, I feel that hydrogen could prove as popular or more popular.

I’ve read, from an industrial production standpoint it’s inefficient to produce hydrogen centrally and transport to individual stations. Yet, as electricity production becomes more efficient to the grid or local solar, the local large scale production of hydrogen also becomes more efficient for a properly equipped station. Then consumers can continue with their conventional vehicular energy use habits of filling up when convenient, even if at the last minute and late for a meeting.
Old 02-06-2021, 04:43 PM
  #78  
911-TOUR
Rennlist Member
 
911-TOUR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: At the outer marker...
Posts: 1,616
Received 327 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fnckr
What about the economics or profit potential of Big Oil shifting to industrial production and/or retail selling through of hydrogen and filling stations for hydrogen fuel cell or hydrogen powered cars?

The technology and adoption has lagged, in my opinion, because of the “sexiness” of Tesla driving EV popularity. This is inline with the post earlier about the “war” on ICE. It could be argued that hydrogen is a more convenient and closer to conventional store and use of energy than battery EVs. Thus, as the majority of the population begins to consider the real benefits and detriments of alternative energy transport, I feel that hydrogen could prove as popular or more popular.

I’ve read, from an industrial production standpoint it’s inefficient to produce hydrogen centrally and transport to individual stations. Yet, as electricity production becomes more efficient to the grid or local solar, the local large scale production of hydrogen also becomes more efficient for a properly equipped station. Then consumers can continue with their conventional vehicular energy use habits of filling up when convenient, even if at the last minute and late for a meeting.
There is a lot of work going on into scalable hydrogen production & delivery, particularly in the EU. The biggest hurdle - and its a truly big one - is Heath & Safety. There are three major issues w.r.t. Hydrogen as a transportation fuel:

(1) Flammability - Hydrogen is very flammable at a wide range of concentrations and has a lower ignition energy than Nat Gas or Gasoline. This is a major challenge
(2) High-Voltage electrical systems used for Efficiency - this is largely similar to EVs in many ways - but there are some subtle differences.
(3) Very high gas pressures - liquid hydrogen that is spilled and transitions to gas can create very high gas pressures very quickly. In a confined space without a functioning safety valve, this results in catastrophic pressure vessel failure.

In short - Hydrogen is quite challenging as a transportation fuel, and a lot of expensive engineering must be undertaken to ameliorate the risks to an acceptable level for public roadways. Perhaps there is a place for hydrogen in long-range specialized heavy transport - but I'm fairly skeptical...

...Rather, I think many of these applications are better suited to CNG, which is far more stable and while not perfectly zero emissions, is still less than gasoline/diesel.

Again, just my 2 bits.
The following users liked this post:
fnckr (02-07-2021)
Old 02-07-2021, 06:52 AM
  #79  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,547
Received 1,679 Likes on 1,089 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911-TOUR
(2) High-Voltage electrical systems used for Efficiency - this is largely similar to EVs in many ways - but there are some subtle differences.
What does that have to do with Hydrogen?

You neglected the two most-important characteristics of Hydrogen vis-a-vis safety:
- unlike every other gas, it heats up as it expands
- no container is completely impermeable to hydrogen

Old 02-08-2021, 11:40 PM
  #80  
c1pher
Rennlist Member
 
c1pher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 1,591
Received 809 Likes on 463 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911-TOUR
I happen to work in the Oil & Gas Industry. Global energy and chemical demand will ensure that gasoline and distillates are available for the next 50 years (at least). Prices will likely rise dramatically as demand outstrips (governmentally / environmentally) limited supply. My own guess is that we can transition to solar/nuclear/wind + thermal battery over the next 50-100 years, and much opportunity will result from the resulting innovation.

Having driven the Taycan and various high-performance Teslas - electric is (going to be) just as compelling as ICE - if not as loud - but energy density has to improve a bit from where it is now.

Just my 2 bits.
But I don’t want my EV powered by coal.
Old 02-11-2021, 03:09 AM
  #81  
anythingbuttime
Pro
 
anythingbuttime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 624
Received 377 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dd356
It's definitely an issue. Question is will technology make it more attractive retail wise in the future. Gas stations do not make a lot of money off gas now. That's why they sell everything and the kitchen sink. They've become mini Walmarts in a lot of areas.
I have not been inside a gas station in 25 years. (I am being literal.) I'm certain they are doing just fine from gas sales.
Old 02-11-2021, 03:14 AM
  #82  
anythingbuttime
Pro
 
anythingbuttime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 624
Received 377 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary JR
Depends on supply. The part you missed in Econ 101.
None of us knows the future, but OPEC has to suffer from a decrease in demand. Sure, in the short term they can match supply, but at some point they are going to have to cover their bills like everyone else and OPEC will be pushing out more volume to make up for lower prices.
Old 02-11-2021, 07:39 AM
  #83  
Mark Dreyer
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Mark Dreyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 4,980
Received 671 Likes on 365 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fnckr
I was just coming back to write that. I didn’t buy the car as an investment. I bought it as a toy as well. My wife tells me to “use the **** out of it.”

I actually might feel better about doing that, knowing it will lose value regardless.

How do the “special edition” guys feel about their museum pieces?
I recently bought another person’s museum piece and it’s now my daily driver. With only 43k miles on the clock I figure I have some driving to do.


The following 2 users liked this post by Mark Dreyer:
Porsche911GTS'16 (02-11-2021), XLR82XS (02-11-2021)
Old 02-11-2021, 03:53 PM
  #84  
XLR82XS
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
XLR82XS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: FL | Vegas
Posts: 1,598
Received 692 Likes on 452 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bmwexpat
I predict in 20 years from now the owners of 991's will have that same conversation regarding how their car has a personality and needs to be driven by a human vs. the soulless drone of an EV that drives them to work in 2040.
I'll revisit this thread in 20 years if possible. MB 991.2 will still be in the family and under my care. (I own Pcars and a Tesla)



Quick Reply: Can 911s or any ICE “collectibles” maintain value?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:22 AM.