Maximum Speed with bike on roof?
#17
Might be more than you think. I've seen a test that suggested that running a loaded bike rack cuts your fuel economy by about a third on the highway. Even an empty back rack costs about 20%.
The following users liked this post:
usccharles (08-04-2019)
#18
No way it is that high. Certainly it should reduce mpg though. I had my bike on the 911 for a 1200 mile trip and I averaged over 29 mpg surprisingly.
#20
So I finally have an opportunity to do a road trip with my bike next weekend.
I have OEM Porsche rack and Porsche road bike mount.
I’ve never driven with a bike on a roof rack and after doing my first test install I’m a bit worried about how fast I can drive. Any advice from roof rack regular users?
What is maximum mph I can drive? Can I do 100mph? I’m on a 500 mile round trip ride.
Thanks in advance and and any other advice I may need during my trip will be much appreciated!
I had had to put a couple rubber dots to get rid of vibration when no bike is on the rack.
#21
The following users liked this post:
usccharles (08-04-2019)
The following users liked this post:
usccharles (08-05-2019)
#26
Here are some wind tunnel results for a Buick TourX that were measured recently:
#28
One of the main reasons I like my Seasucker - you can have it on and off in a minute or two and it stows easily in the frunk. I have the mini-bomber that holds 2 bikes - has 4 vacuum cups that each are pull-rated for 210lbs. (plus you have a 5th and 6th cup for the rear wheel support). I'm not worried about the bike holding. Additionally, if you have a sunroof, you can easily see the priming piston and recognize when you need to give them a few pumps (if you've had it on the roof for a while). It's a great system and I can fit a 700c road or cyclocross wheel in the frunk when the bike is on the car - and have plenty of room in the backseat for a wheelbag for an extra pair.
The following users liked this post:
usccharles (08-05-2019)
#29
Without knowing how fast subshooter was driving and comparing that with the mileage of the car driven at the same speed without the rack, we don't really know much. A bike has low frontal area, but a high drag coefficient because it has lots of components the air must flow around. Flowing around six 1-inch tubes in a row is probably as draggy as six 1-inch tubes side-by-side.
Here are some wind tunnel results for a Buick TourX that were measured recently:
Here are some wind tunnel results for a Buick TourX that were measured recently:
The following users liked this post:
usccharles (08-05-2019)
#30
Without knowing how fast subshooter was driving and comparing that with the mileage of the car driven at the same speed without the rack, we don't really know much. A bike has low frontal area, but a high drag coefficient because it has lots of components the air must flow around. Flowing around six 1-inch tubes in a row is probably as draggy as six 1-inch tubes side-by-side.
Here are some wind tunnel results for a Buick TourX that were measured recently:
Here are some wind tunnel results for a Buick TourX that were measured recently:
The following users liked this post:
usccharles (08-05-2019)