Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991.1 Bore Scoring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-23-2019, 12:14 PM
  #61  
sampelligrino
Rennlist Member
 
sampelligrino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,995
Received 457 Likes on 272 Posts
Default

Seems like weight has a hand in this? PAG recommends 0W40 but seems like many are running 5W40. Due to cold weather and/or cold start? Didn't know people ran 5W40 in LA but some do
Old 04-23-2019, 12:24 PM
  #62  
Airbag997
Rennlist Member
 
Airbag997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,210
Received 502 Likes on 262 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sampelligrino
Seems like weight has a hand in this? PAG recommends 0W40 but seems like many are running 5W40. Due to cold weather and/or cold start? Didn't know people ran 5W40 in LA but some do
Yes. 5 vs 0 provides better protection when hot. 0 is all about manufacturers hitting their MPG numbers. Lower viscosity, lower wear protection, better gas mileage.
Old 04-23-2019, 12:26 PM
  #63  
Greg D.
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Greg D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North bay area
Posts: 1,753
Received 279 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Airbag997
Mobil 1 is an inferior oil, with inferior additives to mitigate wear. It scores poorly in all the ASTM performance metrics. All these FACTORS contribute to bore scoring and the like. This is not a one-dimensional problem, it's combinatorial.
Interesting, thank you for bringing that up. I assumed Mobil1 was still the same old good oil, wasn't aware of a decline in formulation.
It's not a religious issue to me, if Motul is provably better (and the above posting seem to indicate so) then I'll use motul. I just ordered some.
Old 04-23-2019, 12:31 PM
  #64  
sampelligrino
Rennlist Member
 
sampelligrino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,995
Received 457 Likes on 272 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Airbag997
Yes. 5 vs 0 provides better protection when hot. 0 is all about manufacturers hitting their MPG numbers. Lower viscosity, lower wear protection, better gas mileage.
Ok lol yet another reason to switch, thanks bro. Auf wiedersehen m1 0W40
Old 04-23-2019, 12:39 PM
  #65  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,501
Received 1,122 Likes on 590 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Airbag997
Oil analysis is hit or miss. People put too much stock into a murky science at best. Go ask the E9x/S65 owners how effective their Blackstone Oil Analysis worked for them when many of them won their rod-bearing lottery shortly after a "successful" Blackstone analysis....

Empirical performance data is the most useful data. Mobil 1 has poor ASTM empirical performance data. This isn't a difficult concept.
Used oil analysis is only as good as the lab that is used. Blackstone's unit averages and commentary lead people to believe their engines are ok when in fact, they aren't.
Old 04-23-2019, 12:50 PM
  #66  
Al.Fresco
Three Wheelin'
 
Al.Fresco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,852
Received 331 Likes on 190 Posts
Default

Isn't this test posted earlier generally known to be a bull$h1t test for car engines???



Old 04-23-2019, 01:04 PM
  #67  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,501
Received 1,122 Likes on 590 Posts
Default

No. The test is an actual ASTM test, likely carried out by SWRI, who Driven and even OEMS use for similar testing.

Perhaps you are thinking of a Timken Falex tester, which the results can be easily skewed depending on how the load is applied, but mostly by how much moly is present in the lubricant.
Old 04-23-2019, 01:10 PM
  #68  
Airbag997
Rennlist Member
 
Airbag997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,210
Received 502 Likes on 262 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charles Navarro
Used oil analysis is only as good as the lab that is used. Blackstone's unit averages and commentary lead people to believe their engines are ok when in fact, they aren't.
I agree, some labs are better than others. But oil analysis (spectroscopy) is still a inconsistent/murky method/science wrt oil. Especially with the varying quantity of additives high-end oils use, which further obfuscate the results.
Old 04-23-2019, 02:47 PM
  #69  
Al.Fresco
Three Wheelin'
 
Al.Fresco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,852
Received 331 Likes on 190 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charles Navarro
No. The test is an actual ASTM test, likely carried out by SWRI, who Driven and even OEMS use for similar testing.

Perhaps you are thinking of a Timken Falex tester, which the results can be easily skewed depending on how the load is applied, but mostly by how much moly is present in the lubricant.
These are some of the links that made me question it.....

https://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forum...Number=1584948
https://forums.noria.com/topic/4-bal...lick-marketing
https://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=38168
Old 04-23-2019, 03:02 PM
  #70  
Airbag997
Rennlist Member
 
Airbag997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,210
Received 502 Likes on 262 Posts
Default

Brinelling is brinelling.
Old 04-23-2019, 03:35 PM
  #71  
Noah Fect
Rennlist Member
 
Noah Fect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,243
Received 1,299 Likes on 886 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Airbag997
They added additional oil-channels so more oil could flow on the cam lobes that were exhibiting excessive wear. Excessive wear is also mitigated by a better oil. Mobil 1 is an inferior oil, with inferior additives to mitigate wear. It scores poorly in all the ASTM performance metrics. All these FACTORS contribute to bore scoring and the like. This is not a one-dimensional problem, it's combinatorial.
Even the best oil won't do a good job if it doesn't reach the surfaces that need lubrication. Now that Porsche has made the necessary engineering changes, we might find that a GT3 engine with Mobil 1 fails in 221,144 miles while one with your oil of choice makes it all the way to 223,930 miles. Conversely, an unmodified engine might frag itself in less than 50K miles through no fault of the oil.

In other words, nothing in the history of this particular problem tells us anything about the effect of oil/additive quality. Agree/disagree?
Old 04-24-2019, 10:14 AM
  #72  
NuttyProfessor
Three Wheelin'
 
NuttyProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,968
Received 218 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Airbag997
I agree, some labs are better than others. But oil analysis (spectroscopy) is still a inconsistent/murky method/science wrt oil. Especially with the varying quantity of additives high-end oils use, which further obfuscate the results.
Oil Analysis is essentially "Tribology" which is a branch of quite many scientific fields such as Chemistry, Engineering, and Physics. Tribology is a highly disciplined quantitative research science. Oil analysis is not spectroscopy. Tribologists use spectrometers and FTIR. Maybe that's what you're thinking?

Last edited by NuttyProfessor; 04-24-2019 at 11:01 AM.
Old 04-24-2019, 10:19 AM
  #73  
limegreen
Pro
 
limegreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 661
Received 137 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Al.Fresco
Isn't this test posted earlier generally known to be a bull$h1t test for car engines???




Why is this graph considered relevant to Mobil 1 0W-40?
Old 04-24-2019, 10:32 AM
  #74  
Airbag997
Rennlist Member
 
Airbag997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,210
Received 502 Likes on 262 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NuttyProfessor
Oil Analysis is essentially "Tribology" which is a branch of quite many scientific fields such as Chemistry, Engineering, and Physics. Tribology is a highly disciplined quantitative research science. Oil analysis is not spectroscopy. Tribologists use spectrometers and FTIR. Maybe that's what your thinking?
I suggest you read this: https://www.blackstone-labs.com/abou...-oil-analysis/

"Spectral exam:
In the spectral exam, we take a portion of your oil sample and run it through a machine called a spectrometer. The spectrometer analyzes the oil and tells us the levels of the various metals and additives that are present in the oil. This gives us a gauge of how your engine is wearing. To learn more about the elements we look at and where they come from in your oil, go to our Report Explanation page."
Old 04-24-2019, 10:33 AM
  #75  
NuttyProfessor
Three Wheelin'
 
NuttyProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,968
Received 218 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

Wow. I can't believe I stumbled upon this thread. I thought it was just us M96/M97 owners that had this bore scoring problem.


Quick Reply: 991.1 Bore Scoring



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:24 AM.