Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Wheel Spacers - share

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2018 | 07:36 PM
  #16  
Joec500's Avatar
Joec500
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,529
Likes: 1,341
From: Los Angeles
Default

14mm front 12mm rear on a 991.1 and sport techno wheels which are .5 wider than other 991 rear wheel offerings



Reply
Old Oct 12, 2018 | 07:50 PM
  #17  
Bob Z.'s Avatar
Bob Z.
Rennlist Member
Veteran: Navy
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 13,905
Likes: 4,031
From: Marineland FL
Default

Be careful going too big with the spacers since the more your tires stick out the more stones can be flung at the car.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2018 | 08:50 PM
  #18  
Joec500's Avatar
Joec500
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,529
Likes: 1,341
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by stout
^ This is really something for 991.2 owners to consider.

I recently ran into this while trying to fit a set of aftermarket wheels to my 2018 Carrera. I was very happy with the stock wheels + 5mm spacers front and rear (didn't even really need the rears for the reason stated above), but what the Tire Rack and others said would fit ended up having unacceptable "poke" with N-spec Michelins (I'd be worried about the rear fenders...) and looked only a bit better with the "weaker" fall-away sidewalls of the N-spec Pirellis. Looking at Tire Rack's site and toggling between the same wheel for 991.1 and 991.2, it looks like most of the wheel industry missed the offset change. Rear wheels offered for the 991.1 and 991.2 are listed with the same offset. In my car's case, the stock rear wheel's rear offset is ET76 while the aftermarket wheels said to fit the car were ET62. That's like adding a 14mm spacer to a wheel and tire that already fills the fender rather nicely in the 991.2.

So what's good for the 991.1 is not necessarily gonna work on the 991.2. Several folks swore the ET62 wheel of the same size would work, and that others are running them on 991.2s—and I believe them, as there's a car in Europe that is, and is being tracked—but it looked a bit juvenile to me real life and, in technical terms, +14mm makes me uncomfortable in this application. Much as I like the design and technical advantages of the wheel, I decided to stick with the factory Carrera S 20s for now. Custom wheel makers can of course account for the 991.2 offset change, but it may affect wheel design (which is why the factory 991.2 NB rear wheels are so flat-faced). My hope is that wheel makers will introduce proper rear wheels for the 991.2 with an ET of 72-74~ mm—as they already have the fronts. Otherwise, they're missing the other "half~" of the 991 market...and all Carrera T customers.

So...be sure to look at the offset of any wheels you consider, and remember that the spacer setups that work for a 991.1 may not work with a 991.2. I view 5mm as the max for the 991.2 NB rear, and have run the factory 5mm spacers all around. Visually, the front would look better with 7-10mm or even 12-14mm spacers, but I'd have to get comfortable with the technical impact of that before moving up from the factory 5mm spacers or maybe aftermarket 7mm spacers up front.
I am getting a set of Forged Monoblocks made right now from Rotiform. The prices are pretty competitive for a custom forged made in the USA wheel.

They have a GT3/GT4 style wheel called PGT.

http://www.rotiform.com/pgt-w-47283.htm

Reply
Old Feb 1, 2019 | 07:05 PM
  #19  
Cyberbug's Avatar
Cyberbug
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 80
From: Central New Jersey
Default

Ordered some spacers today, after doing some measurements on the car, ordered 17mm for front and 5mm for rear with appropriate Titanium Bolts.
On the T (991.2) the Rear is pretty good and close to the fender lip, so 5mm would be enough. but the front is almost 1.2" tucked in, so it needs a lot.

Opposite of 991.1
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2019 | 07:15 PM
  #20  
NJ991's Avatar
NJ991
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 385
From: Northern NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Cyberbug
Ordered some spacers today, after doing some measurements on the car, ordered 17mm for front and 5mm for rear with appropriate Titanium Bolts.
On the T (991.2) the Rear is pretty good and close to the fender lip, so 5mm would be enough. but the front is almost 1.2" tucked in, so it needs a lot.

Opposite of 991.1
Nice, post pics once you have them mounted.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2019 | 08:47 PM
  #21  
bli8's Avatar
bli8
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 830
Likes: 227
Default

Originally Posted by Cyberbug
Ordered some spacers today, after doing some measurements on the car, ordered 17mm for front and 5mm for rear with appropriate Titanium Bolts.
On the T (991.2) the Rear is pretty good and close to the fender lip, so 5mm would be enough. but the front is almost 1.2" tucked in, so it needs a lot.

Opposite of 991.1
Please post pictures and where you ordered from soon.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2019 | 09:03 PM
  #22  
Cyberbug's Avatar
Cyberbug
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 80
From: Central New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by bli8
Please post pictures and where you ordered from soon.
ordered from MaxSpeed Motorsports, great service

it will be a while till I get them on, weather and all

i was glad they had a set which fit my measurements
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2019 | 11:51 PM
  #23  
phefner's Avatar
phefner
Rennlist Member
Veteran: Air Force
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 733
From: Look up.
Default


5mm factory.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2019 | 05:13 PM
  #24  
TXGold's Avatar
TXGold
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 332
Likes: 10
From: Houston, TX
Default








Sorry I can’t post photos from my phone but I’ll try.

I went with 15mm front and 5mm rear on my type II C4S. I also added a 315 R888R to rear and I still could have gone out 5mm more but am near perfect where I’m at on my Sport Chronology wheels. The fronts needed more than 15mm but plan to try to get a 265 up front if I can find something other than a Hoosier. Over all it looks dramatically better especially since adding the Eibach Sorings. I do wish the ride was maybe 5mm lower but like the handling results from eibach and techart and hr feedback did not sound good so happy with the choice.

spacers and bolts are black and also found security locks that work from FVD or something from Germany.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2019 | 05:35 PM
  #25  
V999's Avatar
V999
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 404
From: On a road to nowhere.
Default

Originally Posted by TXGold

Sorry I can’t post photos from my phone but I’ll try.

I went with 15mm front and 5mm rear on my type II C4S. I also added a 315 R888R to rear and I still could have gone out 5mm more but am near perfect where I’m at on my Sport Chronology wheels. The fronts needed more than 15mm but plan to try to get a 265 up front if I can find something other than a Hoosier. Over all it looks dramatically better especially since adding the Eibach Sorings. I do wish the ride was maybe 5mm lower but like the handling results from eibach and techart and hr feedback did not sound good so happy with the choice.

spacers and bolts are black and also found security locks that work from FVD or something from Germany.
Looks great. But what are the wheel specs? Gotta know width, offset and diameter to get a complete picture.

Also, that’s looks very tight in the front. I would think the tires would rub at full lock. No rubbing?
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2019 | 06:29 PM
  #26  
phefner's Avatar
phefner
Rennlist Member
Veteran: Air Force
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 733
From: Look up.
Default

TxGold LOVE the look sir!
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2019 | 04:33 PM
  #27  
wbrownie's Avatar
wbrownie
Racer
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 313
Likes: 27
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by Cyberbug
Ordered some spacers today, after doing some measurements on the car, ordered 17mm for front and 5mm for rear with appropriate Titanium Bolts.
On the T (991.2) the Rear is pretty good and close to the fender lip, so 5mm would be enough. but the front is almost 1.2" tucked in, so it needs a lot.

Opposite of 991.1
I think 17MM will be too much. I test fit 15MM on my T and felt that they pushed the wheels out too much. I put on some 5MM that I had lying around and these certainly helped. I would go 10MM or max 12MM. I think the rear is perfect as is.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2019 | 05:04 PM
  #28  
StormRune's Avatar
StormRune
Race Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,071
Likes: 690
From: Austin, TX
Default

Agreed. HRE's recommended fitment on the front of my 991.1 resulted in an increase of 12mm of offset and it looked just right to me (considering a combination of a half inch wider wheel and some additional offset: 9.5" and 45mm offset)
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2019 | 06:31 PM
  #29  
Cyberbug's Avatar
Cyberbug
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 80
From: Central New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by wbrownie
I think 17MM will be too much. I test fit 15MM on my T and felt that they pushed the wheels out too much. I put on some 5MM that I had lying around and these certainly helped. I would go 10MM or max 12MM. I think the rear is perfect as is.
I felt that rear needed 5mm, so both our perceptions may be a personal choice.
But its easy to swap as needed. Right now the front gap is too much.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2019 | 06:32 PM
  #30  
wbrownie's Avatar
wbrownie
Racer
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 313
Likes: 27
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by Cyberbug
I felt that rear needed 5mm, so both our perceptions may be a personal choice.
But its easy to swap as needed. Right now the front gap is too much.
Cool. Looking forward to seeing how it works out.
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:55 PM.