Over Rev Question
Drifting
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 315
Just asking because I haven't a clue.
Can't the numbers be valid if they were generated from different events?
If you have a big mis-shift, can't you get a bunch of level 6's but very few below that as it flew through the lower ranges so fast?
Can't the numbers be valid if they were generated from different events?
If you have a big mis-shift, can't you get a bunch of level 6's but very few below that as it flew through the lower ranges so fast?
Banned
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 26,140
Likes: 5,464
From: Chicagoland Area
Originally Posted by Wild Weasel
Just asking because I haven't a clue.
Can't the numbers be valid if they were generated from different events?
If you have a big mis-shift, can't you get a bunch of level 6's but very few below that as it flew through the lower ranges so fast?
Can't the numbers be valid if they were generated from different events?
If you have a big mis-shift, can't you get a bunch of level 6's but very few below that as it flew through the lower ranges so fast?
Regardless, look at the average MPH. 21,000 miles divided by +2,999 hours. That's a dead tell right there the report is fishy.
Racer
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 317
Likes: 60
From: Greenville SC
Rennlist Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 316
From: San Antonio
Did I miss where he posted the total engine hours? The 2996h is just the last time the engine registered range 1 over revs. It's possible that it's been driven gingerly since 2996h and hasn't added any revs to that.
Banned
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 26,140
Likes: 5,464
From: Chicagoland Area
It doesn't matter the entire report is bogus. You can't have more range 5s than range 6s. You can't have more range 4s than you do range 3s. Having an average MPH of <7 is also a red flag. This car should have about only 600 hours on it. The DME is showing over 2,900 hours. More fake news.
