Notices
991 Turbo 2012-2019 Turbo and Turbo S
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Road Spy

Main Difference between Turbo and Turbo S besides hp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2016, 01:48 PM
  #16  
PMAA
Rennlist Member
 
PMAA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 246
Received 116 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by carnut52
I have had both 2014 TT and just got a 2017 TTS. There is a noticeable difference in driving the two cars. I would opt for the TTS everytime going forward. Braking and acceleration are the two major differences.
I very much agree! I too traded my 2014 TT for a 2017 TTS and the performance difference is very noticeable. The acceleration (seat of the pants measurements) just seems much stronger in sport mode (even while keeping the RPMs below 4K) and the braking is much improved with CCB (I just hope I never have to replace them).
Old 06-15-2016, 04:34 PM
  #17  
philg3
Rennlist Member
 
philg3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 887
Received 94 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PMAA
I very much agree! I too traded my 2014 TT for a 2017 TTS and the performance difference is very noticeable. The acceleration (seat of the pants measurements) just seems much stronger in sport mode (even while keeping the RPMs below 4K) and the braking is much improved with CCB (I just hope I never have to replace them).
This to be true, but this is comparing a 991.1TT to a 991.2TTS, and the 991.2 has numerous performance enhancements including higher horsepower, torque, and EMU tweaks, among others, so the performance difference would likely be noticeable. However, the question on some minds is -- what's the difference in performance between the current generation 991.2TT versus the 991.2 TTS. Zero-60 improves by 0.1sec on the TTS. With that in mind, I thought the Turbo would be adequate for my needs -- that's what I ordered.
Old 06-15-2016, 06:00 PM
  #18  
Hothonda
Burning Brakes
 
Hothonda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,194
Received 34 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

RE: PCCB brakes from Excellence Magazine excerpt (Porsche Braking Systems), August 2016 pp 109.

Standard equip on TTS 2014-2017

Old 06-19-2016, 01:21 PM
  #19  
Need4S
Burning Brakes
 
Need4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 1,176
Received 80 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

If you don't want PCCBs and center lock wheels, a nicely optioned Turbo could be a better value. I have a '15 non-S and the only option everyone says is "must have" that I lack is PDCC. I didn't really miss it until a track session, when I found that it was hard to manage tire temperatures, as there seemed to be uneven tire loading once you start driving for extended periods at 8/10 or 9/10s. This might have been helped by PDCC. Otherwise, a $160k car with everything else I want doesn't seem a bad deal.
Old 11-14-2018, 10:52 AM
  #20  
derf
Instructor
 
derf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 146
Received 93 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PMAA
I very much agree! I too traded my 2014 TT for a 2017 TTS and the performance difference is very noticeable. The acceleration (seat of the pants measurements) just seems much stronger in sport mode (even while keeping the RPMs below 4K) and the braking is much improved with CCB (I just hope I never have to replace them).
Only comparison would really be a 991.2 TT vs 991.2 TTS imo
Old 11-14-2018, 08:49 PM
  #21  
Jim991
Burning Brakes
 
Jim991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 931
Received 183 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

The HP difference between the 991.1 TT v TTS is easily erased with a stock Cobb tune. I don't see the reason for the two cars given the relatively small price difference and limited improvement on the TTS. I guess that's why most buyers chose the TTS. Why buy the lesser badge for the minimal discount?
Old 11-15-2018, 06:50 AM
  #22  
Hothonda
Burning Brakes
 
Hothonda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,194
Received 34 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim991
The HP difference between the 991.1 TT v TTS is easily erased with a stock Cobb tune. I don't see the reason for the two cars given the relatively small price difference and limited improvement on the TTS. I guess that's why most buyers chose the TTS. Why buy the lesser badge for the minimal discount?


At the time I purchased, my new '15TT had an MSRP of $172.5....TTS cars I was looking at were about $10K -15K more.
I did not want center locks (5 lug were avail on TTS and a N/C option but there were none in my region) and
the other things that were standard on the TTS v TT made no difference to me. Performance wise I could tell
-0- difference driving both back to back.

Having no "S" on the back bumper means squat to me...."lesser badge" envy ha ha

Doing a couple thousand $$ Cobb/GIAC tune on the '14 to '16TT models erases any power difference between the two
if you are so inclined to do one....for me the TT was a bargain in comparison.

RE: '14 (incl '15 & '16) Turbo v TURBO S:
Excellence Magazine article - 12/13 issue (pp 62) interview w/August Achleitner, director of 911 product line -
stated that the 991 thicker piston crowns compared to the 997 Turbo were changed in the 991 Turbo to
withstand "greater combustion pressure" w/no change in in the 9.8:1 compression ratio.

Additionally goes on to say the '14 Turbo S motor is MECHANICALLY unchanged from the base Turbo,
relying purely on an ECU software remap for its extra power & torque.


Last edited by Hothonda; 11-15-2018 at 10:34 AM.
The following users liked this post:
nota_troll (02-08-2020)
Old 11-15-2018, 10:18 AM
  #23  
the_buch
Rennlist Member
 
the_buch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,361
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

I really like the look of the CLs, but don't want them. I like the lower, though considerably more frequent, costs of replacing my brakes and no risk of squeaking. I can count on one hand the number of times other than the track I've been able to safely use the measly 540hp I have, and probably couldn't tell the difference at 0.1 sec to 60 from the extra 40. If I ever get bored (which can happen when you get used to more power), and when the warranty runs out, I'll find myself on the slippery slope but with first improvement being sound (both exhaust and Bose). I might have paid up to an extra $10K for bragging rights with the S, and it is certainly arguable that resale might be relatively stronger, but this is not part of my investment portfolio
Old 11-15-2018, 06:00 PM
  #24  
rcg412
Rennlist Member
 
rcg412's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Back-Country Greenwich, CT
Posts: 1,816
Received 122 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

I specifically wanted a turbo, not an S, as I do a lot of track events. Which means you don't want a) PCCB and b) center lock wheels.

I do however have PDCC on my turbo, which I think is a very cool feature.
Old 11-15-2018, 11:41 PM
  #25  
chance6
Race Car
 
chance6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere out East
Posts: 3,805
Received 1,504 Likes on 964 Posts
Default

Concur on the PDCC! I love it. I wished I'd had it on my Panny turbo back in the day. I loved that twin turbo V8. Now I love the twin turbo flat six.

I didn't need PCCB or centerlocks, but I wanted the Burmester, which I do not regret.

Truth be told, the 991.2TT is the same performance (even slightly better in some cases) than the older 991.1 TTS.
Old 11-16-2018, 12:05 AM
  #26  
Need4S
Burning Brakes
 
Need4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 1,176
Received 80 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rcg412
I specifically wanted a turbo, not an S, as I do a lot of track events. Which means you don't want a) PCCB and b) center lock wheels.

I do however have PDCC on my turbo, which I think is a very cool feature.
+1 Very cool re PDCC. I've since added a DSC v.2 controller to my car, which lacks PDCC, but gives me pretty much the same results as if I had PDCC.
Old 01-05-2019, 09:07 AM
  #27  
kauekaue
1st Gear
 
kauekaue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Ambition

In my opinion the psycho difference is about ambition. You dont have anything next Turbo S. This is the end of that line. You get everything to satisfied your power sense.

But, if Porsche shows up the new Turbo’s line up like Turbo, Turbo S AND Turbo RS, Turbo S will be a Turbo **** level 2 (ask to japonik)?

No, in my opinion Turbo is Turbo. The door that was open in 1974. Turbo S is the new line product to get better sales margin. Simple like that.
The following users liked this post:
typehxr1 (11-22-2021)
Old 01-05-2019, 10:51 AM
  #28  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,590
Received 1,551 Likes on 970 Posts
Default

I remember watching a YouTube video review of the 991.1 Turbo S, and the reviewer stated that the “internals are modified” on the Turbo S compared to the Turbo to handle the extra power. That statement is contrary to what I read here on Rennlist. Does anybody know if there’s anything different about the internals of the engine in the 991.1 Turbo S cars? If so, what is different? I’ve always thought that the only engine difference was a moderate tune.
The following users liked this post:
stevwang (04-01-2023)
Old 01-05-2019, 12:53 PM
  #29  
chance6
Race Car
 
chance6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere out East
Posts: 3,805
Received 1,504 Likes on 964 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dennis C
I remember watching a YouTube video review of the 991.1 Turbo S, and the reviewer stated that the “internals are modified” on the Turbo S compared to the Turbo to handle the extra power. That statement is contrary to what I read here on Rennlist. Does anybody know if there’s anything different about the internals of the engine in the 991.1 Turbo S cars? If so, what is different? I’ve always thought that the only engine difference was a moderate tune.
On the .1 cars, the Turbos are the same size but there's an ECU difference which I think leads to a redline rpm difference as well. But as far as piston design, fuel injector design, turbo impeller size, etc. I think they are the same on .1.

Now on .2 cars, the S has larger turbos.
Old 01-05-2019, 01:25 PM
  #30  
swoobie
Instructor
 
swoobie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 239
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Several items that are standard on the TTS are not on the TT - if you want those options (PDCC, carbon interior, PCCB, CL, etc.), then there is some savings by moving to the TTS vs ordering a la carte. You also pick up 40hp for free. This is the primary reason the TTS outsells the TT. As mentioned above the kicker for 991.2 TTS is new, larger turbos, which further differentiate the TTS from TT from 2017 forward. Those differences and the much lower production of 991.2 are the cause of the price separation between the 991.1 and 991.2 TTS.


Quick Reply: Main Difference between Turbo and Turbo S besides hp



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:23 AM.