Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Has anyone leased a GT3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2014 | 01:07 PM
  #46  
Zucc's Avatar
Zucc
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 966
Likes: 3
From: Southeast, USA
Default

Jimmy- Got it. You are referring to someone that over financed and is upside down when they total their vehicle.
Old 09-18-2014 | 01:09 PM
  #47  
Jimmy-D's Avatar
Jimmy-D
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 11,298
Likes: 1,496
From: Midwest
Default

Yes
Old 09-18-2014 | 01:55 PM
  #48  
Scorponok's Avatar
Scorponok
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 978
Likes: 87
From: The Cloud
Default

This is an awesome discussion. Cars depreciate any way you look at it. Any hope that it won't is just a pipe dream.

Money is cheap now, Wells Fargo is offering 1.74% with a relationship discount. I'd much rather keep my cash (and be able to pay it off at anytime I WANT) and invest it in Mooty's 5% return!

Mooty, do share please!
Old 09-18-2014 | 01:57 PM
  #49  
Pazzo009's Avatar
Pazzo009
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 549
Likes: 24
From: NY
Default

Seriously, thank you all so much for all of your help. You guys really took the time to explain everything and it has been very helpful. Not sure what I'm doing yet because I am awaiting more information.
Old 09-18-2014 | 02:10 PM
  #50  
Pazzo009's Avatar
Pazzo009
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 549
Likes: 24
From: NY
Default

Yes cars are typically a poor investment. It comes down to need Vs. want and lets face it, in matters of Porsches, "wants" always trump. In the regards to GT3's however it appears they are holding value so this is a considerable factor in this discussion.
Old 09-18-2014 | 02:23 PM
  #51  
Manifold's Avatar
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 13,422
Likes: 4,606
From: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Default

Depreciation (or appreciation) on this car will be a function of many factors and is hard to predict.

I've discussed this with several people who are knowledgeable about Porsche price variations over time. Some predict significant depreciation (especially 2 or 3 years from now), others minimal depreciation, and one sees potential appreciation if the car is well maintained. In other words, all over the map, average being some depreciation.

Values of previous GT3 generations can sort of be used as precedents but, per the topic of this thread, the future doesn't necessarily repeat the past.
Old 09-18-2014 | 02:33 PM
  #52  
hfm's Avatar
hfm
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 85
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by mooty
yes and no.
again if you have tax benefits, then different story.
but fundamentally,

financing is usually 5 years
leasing is usually 3 years

calculate the total money out of pocket in 5 yr of finance
calculate the total money out of pocket in 3 year of lease, then pay the residual in cash (PREMISE WAS THAT I HAD THE CASH TO PAY, BUT I CHOSE NOT TO). you will find the total speng in both closes are really really close. generally less than 5000 in 100k cars.

assuming u have comparable leasing and financing rates. if the manufacture is subsidizing leases (like porsche did 10 yrs ago or as bmw continues to do) then you are not comparing leasing vs financing. you are distorting the result with unnatural rates.
Interesting perspective. Here are the numbers I may anticipate on $100k loan from Lockheed Federal Credit Union based upon a FICO of 832:

4 year 1.49%. $2,147.00 monthly payment with total interest paid on loan $3,072.00.

5 year 1.95%. $1,730.00 monthly payment with total interest paid on loan $5,037.00.

6 year 2.25%. $1,486 monthly payment with total interest paid on loan $6,998.00.

No prepayment penalty.

I used to pay cash for cars and I concluded I want this auto loan as it is the only remaining type of loan I need to work towards a 850 FICO. And, that the six year low monthly payment option is best as I have the flexibility to use my money elsewhere (opportunity cost flexibility) and prepay more should I choose to do so at any point in time in order to end up paying less interest.

And, of course, since I will be writing off a portion of the vehicle as a business deduction and enjoying the car I want, I'll be killing two birds with one stone. The lease option just doesn't come into play in my scenario but obviously, it maybe ideal for someone else, especially someone who isn't planning on keeping their GT3 long term.

Dan (thinks it's funny that you get serious when you're posting about money instead of the track)
Old 09-18-2014 | 02:45 PM
  #53  
mooty's Avatar
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 43,564
Likes: 5,897
From: san francisco
Default

hahah, nizer, money gets me excited so i park my car and use more than my thumb to reply.....

Originally Posted by k997
This is an awesome discussion. Cars depreciate any way you look at it. Any hope that it won't is just a pipe dream.

Money is cheap now, Wells Fargo is offering 1.74% with a relationship discount. I'd much rather keep my cash (and be able to pay it off at anytime I WANT) and invest it in Mooty's 5% return!

Mooty, do share please!
i buy and sell illegal drugs... oops, did i just reveal my secret?




Originally Posted by A36Pilot
Here is a link to an interesting article:

http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/20...ire-next-door/

Please refer to Lesson #8.
very true, and i actually see a lot of this with clients. they BUY their cars. but they dont buy aston, porsche etc. a lot of clients over 50MM in asset drive 10 year old honda civic, toyota camry. i am not kidding. and we are not in the rural area. this is san francisco.... a BIG city. so to say wealthy buy their cars, it has to be qualified as to what the sample pool is....

Originally Posted by Zucc
I think that most people that buy a $150,000 car can pay cash for it if they want to. People who are concerned about payments don't buy $150,000 cars. The question is what is the best way to pay for it, cash, finance, or lease. For me it is just math. When I can borrow money at 2% or less I finance. If lease rates were 2% or less, then I would lease, assuming the acquisition and disposition fee are in line. When rates are higher, I pay cash.

For those that are worried that the car won't feel the same, don't tell it!
right on

Originally Posted by Jimmy-D
I pay cash for my toys. - Why?

1 - Because I can
2 - The only debt I carry is my Mortgage
3 - I want to OWN my car not a Bank or some leasing company
4 - And most importantly - When I hit a tree they will be sending me a check and I will not be writing one.
nothing wrong with it. when you are not trying to make every one of your penny work at full throttle, owning the car is the best way. but if we get academic and squeeze all the juice out of the pennies i have, then things change, you get headaches, large spreadsheets, -9 near sightedness, white hair.... you know the drill.



Originally Posted by djcxxx
I've never known an accountant, financial planner, or economist who thought a luxury automobile was a financially sound purchase. Once you cross the rubicon and make the acquisition the rest is rationalization from a purely financial standpoint. Cars are a depreciating asset, period. To maintain so called "investment" grade in a car means you don't drive it. Bend the fender on that GT3 or shunt it on the track and see how much of an investment you're holding.
hahaha, correct. one snort of power is no better than 10 snort of powder. you are fkd either way.

Originally Posted by A36Pilot
Nice discussion everyone. I like reading all viewpoints. Thanks.
glad you are a good sport. not beating on you, but i think many dont understand this topic and certainly i dont either. but this thread will jog ppl's brain and get them to figure out what is best for THEM.

Originally Posted by A36Pilot
There are also intangible benefits of owning a debt-free car. It seems to drive better. Fewer worries overall. There is increased pride of ownership knowing it's yours and not the bank's. And best of all, no payments.
and that intangible benefit is HUGE.

Originally Posted by RSRRacer
You can't fully deduct the lease payment via a business on luxury cars. So validate this during any analysis.
some ppl live dangerously. i try to avoid any deduction on cars thru business. i dont have time to answer to CPA or IRS if they have any questions. the total $ you can deduct is not worth the hassle.

ex: once IRS said i prepay some tax (i didn't). they send me a chk (small one, few hundred bux, which i didn't deposit). months later, the send me another mail stating that i owe them the amount on that chk (*#^%)&(#_%)*_... i then spend a whole year writing to them explaining THEIR mistake over something like $S300 bucks. but wasted weeks and weeks of my time....i much rather waste that time here

Originally Posted by RSRRacer
Mooty on the 5 percent guaranteed return I would love to talk offline if you are inclined.
be careful, i know madoff

Originally Posted by CAlexio
Assuming den on this car is very low after a low mileage 24 month example goes to be sold, the difference between what you paid in lease payments (approx $60k with) is way different from the actual price you can sell the car for (closer to msrp). I can't imagine leasing and then not buying the car to resell it at a gain. Would be crazy to pay $2200/mo for 24 months and then walk away from a car which you can sell for not much less than the original purchase price
yes, if you have low miler your car will have higher residual than projected. and you should buy out, sell it, and get some profit, if you call that profit.

BUT, the flaw in your logic is that you didn't use the benefit your money bought for you until you sold the car. so you just moved money around and didnt drive.

to force the illustration.
say you leased at 2k / month 48000 you spend over your 2 year term.
the 48000 paid allowed you to drive X miles. if you didn't drive all those miles, you OVERPAID.

thus when when pocket the difference at term end, you didnt really make money, you just took some of your money (from 48000) back, which you paid earlier and lost opportunity cost.

another way to look at it is if you plan on driving 2000 miles a year. then you should really find a 2000 mile a year lease ( i know they dont exist, but i am just dong an example). such lease will have higher residual thus lower pmt and the delta b/n residual and real value at lease end will be closer.

so you aren't really gaining anything. you just minimized your loss due to your miscalculation (u drove too little)

financial market is extremely sophisticated on these things. banks dont open doors to lose money. once in a while you might beat them, but it's like going to vegas. if u think you are going to win.... think again.
Old 09-18-2014 | 02:46 PM
  #54  
Lodi's Avatar
Lodi
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 752
Likes: 57
From: Milton, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Pazzo009
All of you have excellent points, thank you I really appreciate it.

Based on my numbers between lease and finance, the payment is essentially the same. At the end I have nothing if I lease (if I hand the car back) and if I finance at the end of 3 years I estimate a minimum of $25-$30k in equity. So yeah, this is a no brainer. The conundrum I face is my how to get out of my current lease. I can order the car and roll the dice that in 3 months I would have found someone. If I didn't I have two choices. Lease the car (unwise) or evaluate the numbers and take the hit by writing a check for the difference or rolling it into the financing. This could be as much as $10k+. Yet still this is likely the smarter option.
I haven't read every reply so I apologize if someone has suggested this, but you might try one of the lease swap websites like swap-a-lease. Do your homework. I am not sure what is involved in assigning your lease. Make sure you don't get stuck with any liability. Good luck!
Old 09-18-2014 | 02:47 PM
  #55  
shapiroeric's Avatar
shapiroeric
Race Car
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,634
Likes: 546
From: Cali
Default

No lease here....I can get about 1.5-2% so I'm borrowing the balance after my trade.....I have a severe mental problem when it comes to writing a big check....I borrow the money then pay it off over the next 6 months....did that with all my cars....I know, it's stupid, but as I said I have something wrong upstairs....
Old 09-18-2014 | 03:23 PM
  #56  
hf1's Avatar
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 10,393
Likes: 1,640
From: Northeast
Default

Keep the value of a depreciating toy below 5% (preferably much less) of your net worth, and it won't matter how you pay for it. Limit your universe to 3+ year old toys and enjoy much slower depreciation. When you think you must have something, you're probably wrong.
Old 09-18-2014 | 04:39 PM
  #57  
rodsky's Avatar
rodsky
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,040
Likes: 881
From: West Los Angeles & Truckee, CA
Default

Originally Posted by A36Pilot
Looks like I touched a nerve. Might be because many owners are financing their vehicles? Anyways all I meant was that when someone says their financing costs are cheap, many times the depreciation is not taken into consideration.
Depreciation has nothing to do with it. As it relates to financing (on a purchase) - depreciation is the same whether you pay cash or finance. On a lease they estimate the depreciation (through residual value) and then the difference is financed. In the case of a GT3, you wouldn't just turn the car back in if its worth more than the residual. You'd buy it at that point or else you have paid for more depreciation than has actually been realized.

Either way - paying cash right now is not smart unless you like to achieve lesser returns on your money. With the cost of money for 60 months at less than 2% - why do it. Take the $165K - make 5% and you're 3% ahead per annum. I'm not suggesting you "acquire" the car unless you have the means to do so - but how you finance it is a different story.
Old 09-18-2014 | 05:21 PM
  #58  
A36Pilot's Avatar
A36Pilot
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

I stand corrected. Thanks.
Old 09-18-2014 | 05:22 PM
  #59  
A36Pilot's Avatar
A36Pilot
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

On the depreciation.
Old 09-18-2014 | 05:32 PM
  #60  
A36Pilot's Avatar
A36Pilot
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rodsky
Either way - paying cash right now is not smart unless you like to achieve lesser returns on your money. With the cost of money for 60 months at less than 2% - why do it. Take the $165K - make 5% and you're 3% ahead per annum. I'm not suggesting you "acquire" the car unless you have the means to do so - but how you finance it is a different story.
I'm not sure one would be ahead under this scenario. Debt servicing on the car loan would most likely be done using after tax dollars. The 5% rate of return on the investment is before tax?


Quick Reply: Has anyone leased a GT3?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:57 AM.