Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

DATA: Actual PCCB wear data shared…90% tracked GT3 991.2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2022, 06:27 PM
  #31  
dapopa9
Instructor
 
dapopa9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 146
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daveo4porsche
By my estimation for the discount prices you can find for replacement PCCB rotors cost wise the PCCB's can nearly match the cost of cast-iron because you can get multiple pad-swaps for one set of rotors. If you can get 5 or more sets of brake pads per-set of PCCB's rotors the total cost vs. steels is not all that terrible and you get to use PCCB rotors which have excellent thermal characteristics and less brake dust.

Great post and thanks for sharing the data.. What is the per rotor price of the PCCB rotor and the Steel rotor that you are basing this off of?
Old 11-17-2022, 06:39 PM
  #32  
RDCR
Rennlist Member
 
RDCR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Santa Cruz - Norcal
Posts: 1,985
Received 485 Likes on 307 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mipcar
Seems I read here or somewhere on RL of a study conducted measuring density on and off the car which demonstrated the impact of the reading.

Can't remember if the bias was for higher or lower wear calculation. Anyone know for sure what the impact is?

I paid my dealer to perform the test. I was not there, so I can only conclude that they did not skimp and removed the rotor.

Here are my stock numbers averages (fairly consistent from factory):

LF 15
RF 15.7
LR 13.7
RR 13.3
Bias is towards higher wear.
The following users liked this post:
mipcar (11-17-2022)
Old 11-17-2022, 06:39 PM
  #33  
driIve
Instructor
 
driIve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: the OC
Posts: 123
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Thanks for the data and the excellent write-up. Totally agree changing pads before full wear is key. The pads act as heat sink, the thicker the pads the more heat it'll take up and dissipate. The PCCB rotors wear exponentially faster as temps rise. Changing at 40% will definitely reduce rotor wear.
The following 2 users liked this post by driIve:
cgomez (04-06-2023), daveo4porsche (11-17-2022)
Old 11-17-2022, 10:01 PM
  #34  
IPSA
Rennlist Member
 
IPSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: S.Fla.
Posts: 624
Received 202 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mipcar
Seems I read here or somewhere on RL of a study conducted measuring density on and off the car which demonstrated the impact of the reading.

Can't remember if the bias was for higher or lower wear calculation. Anyone know for sure what the impact is?

I paid my dealer to perform the test. I was not there, so I can only conclude that they did not skimp and removed the rotor.

Here are my stock numbers averages (fairly consistent from factory):

LF 15
RF 15.7
LR 13.7
RR 13.3

On car measurement tends to read higher wear because of the metal on the inboard side of the rotor.

Take off the car and do not measure on metal surface.
The following users liked this post:
Andi (11-18-2022)
Old 11-24-2022, 05:48 PM
  #35  
Andi
Rennlist Member
 
Andi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 83
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IPSA
On car measurement tends to read higher wear because of the metal on the inboard side of the rotor.

Take off the car and do not measure on metal surface.
has anybody measured the same rotors on and off the car to see how big the measurement difference is?
Old 11-24-2022, 08:24 PM
  #36  
johnsopa
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
johnsopa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 1,237
Received 188 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Andi
has anybody measured the same rotors on and off the car to see how big the measurement difference is?
I’ve done it. The difference is inconsistent. Measuring the same spot on the rotor while installed on the car will vary depending on how the rotor is clocked. Take it off and put it on a wood bench and the readings are consistent.

Last edited by johnsopa; 11-24-2022 at 08:25 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by johnsopa:
Andi (11-24-2022), daveo4porsche (11-24-2022), MaxLTV (08-07-2023)
Old 11-24-2022, 08:31 PM
  #37  
Andi
Rennlist Member
 
Andi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 83
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnsopa
I’ve done it. The difference is inconsistent. Measuring the same spot on the rotor while installed on the car will vary depending on how the rotor is clocked. Take it off and put it on a wood bench and the readings are consistent.
fair enough... thanks!
The following users liked this post:
daveo4porsche (11-24-2022)
Old 11-25-2022, 11:57 AM
  #38  
8202632
Rennlist Member
 
8202632's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 1,027
Received 80 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Is the rotor measurement tool available for purchase? It is affordable? Thanks so much for this write up. Adds empirical evidence where before there was none!!
Old 11-25-2022, 08:37 PM
  #39  
daveo4porsche
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
daveo4porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 5,329
Received 3,631 Likes on 1,777 Posts
Default

the CarboTech tool is about $6k - I have a source for them in the bay area…
Old 11-26-2022, 09:10 AM
  #40  
johnsopa
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
johnsopa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 1,237
Received 188 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnsopa
I’ve done it. The difference is inconsistent. Measuring the same spot on the rotor while installed on the car will vary depending on how the rotor is clocked. Take it off and put it on a wood bench and the readings are consistent.
I wanted to be clear that I worked with the tech at my dealer a few times to do this. I don’t have a Carboteq tool (unfortunately haha).

I track with PCCBs, don’t feel the need to switch to steels based on what I’ve found based on the readings.
The following 2 users liked this post by johnsopa:
daveo4porsche (11-26-2022), Larry Cable (11-26-2022)
Old 11-26-2022, 07:40 PM
  #41  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,556
Received 3,457 Likes on 2,260 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Perimeter
Wow, that is so much different than RL discussions wold lead you to believe
99% of all PCCB RL discussions are FUD based on "anecdotal evidence from a friend/guy I know that tracks a lot" ... etc ...
The following 2 users liked this post by Larry Cable:
dojo (02-25-2023), robmypro (02-22-2023)
Old 11-26-2022, 08:04 PM
  #42  
Palting
Rennlist Member
 
Palting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North Eastern US
Posts: 5,075
Received 238 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnsopa
I wanted to be clear that I worked with the tech at my dealer a few times to do this. I don’t have a Carboteq tool (unfortunately haha).

I track with PCCBs, don’t feel the need to switch to steels based on what I’ve found based on the readings.
I also track with PCCBs. I will be done with my second set of pads after the first run in spring and will be going on my 3rd, which should last me for the rest of the year. With how I've been wearing my pads, likely go on my 4th after that.
Based on the data provided here, I have at least 1 year worth before PCCB rotor wear at the track becomes a concern. I ordered Girodisc rotors and pads and plan to install them for next year's season. That should leave a good years worth of track use on my used PCCB rotors. Should sound good for if and when I resell my car.
The following users liked this post:
daveo4porsche (04-06-2023)
Old 02-22-2023, 10:12 AM
  #43  
Big Swole
Rennlist Member
 
Big Swole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Metro Atlanta, GA area
Posts: 7,075
Received 2,020 Likes on 1,268 Posts
Default

Sub'd to read later.


Thanks
Old 04-06-2023, 11:25 AM
  #44  
cgomez
Rennlist Member
 
cgomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NYC Area
Posts: 1,244
Received 20 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Fantastic feedback and data Dave.

I too came to the conclusion that it made sense to keep using CCBs on my Street Cars with occasional track use. My conclusion was based on the data when I raced CCBs in a Ferrari Challenge for 3 seasons. On average I could do 3-4 race weekends that included 2 x 45mins sprint races plus 4 x 30mins sessions (on those I did no more than 7-10mins / 3-4 laps all-out at a time. With that info and understanding that heat is the main culprit of wear I came to thee conclusion that most likely I would never wear the Street cars CCBs in the 3-4 years of average ownership

With more than 1 car + racing on race cars, I rarely do more than 5-7 track days, and in the street cars being SO HEAVY, the weakest link for la-time is the tires so I rarely do more than 2-3 hard laps at a time before having to do a cool down lap for the tires to regain grip or come into the pits and check my lap data. Only on a heavy (and almost 200mph fast!) Ferrari FF at Daytona I felt that the rotors were being put to their max on just 1-2 laps.

Love the consistent , no fade under any circumstances feel of CCB brakes on Trackable streetcars. Very disappointed that the factory option on non RS cars is not available due to supply as the ordering price on the option is relatively" cheap. But I do agree with you that Porsche has to be making 60%+ margin on the replacements
__________________



Quick Reply: DATA: Actual PCCB wear data shared…90% tracked GT3 991.2



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:23 AM.