Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The future 911 range, including the GT3, will exclusively use turbocharged six-cylind

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-2018, 10:40 PM
  #91  
GT3
Three Wheelin'
 
GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,875
Received 273 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
​Besides, AP said at the last Rennsport Reunion that the focus of future GT cars would be less weight, not more power.
But how exactly will they do this? They’ve only gone up in weight on every new platform due to safety regulations etc, beyond their control. Unless they implement full carbon fiber tubs and tons of other carbon components, I don’t see it happen. I wish they did a 2700 lbs model, even if it brought the price into the $300k range. But it would completely restructure their consumer base and production volume...
Old 08-09-2018, 10:51 PM
  #92  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,291
Received 286 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

^ I see it the other way - according to C&D, curb weight of the 1995 993 was 3,080, and the latest GT3 is 3,276 (manual, without PCCB or CF seats). Considering how much more size, performance, and safety the new car has, they have held weight down remarkably well over the last ~25 years without introducing exotic materials. I don't see the 911 getting bigger, so IMO keeping weight where it is...or less...won't be a challenge. Turbos and/or batteries, however, would add weight.
Old 08-09-2018, 10:53 PM
  #93  
soulsea
Rennlist Member
 
soulsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: 29464
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 0
Received 1,782 Likes on 528 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
​IMO the horsepower war isn't what it used to be. I think the performance car buying public is generally aware that 500+ is far more than enough for any street or track, and that in reality another 100 isn't going to make the car any faster. Besides, AP said at the last Rennsport Reunion that the focus of future GT cars would be less weight, not more power.
Didn't he (or another PAG big wig) also say when the Z06 and/or Demon came out that they weren't going to chase high HP? Yet here we are with the GT2RS.

Speaking of which, the GT2RS is faster than GT3RS on basically the same chassis, so obviously horsepower does make the car faster, albeit with diminishing returns.

Plus all but a few consumers will ever make use of any high HP car, but it matters to 'the general public" even more than those who do make use of it as it's mostly about cars & coffee and insta cred anyway ... I mean that's why all these manufacturers run the Ring to begin with when all but a few people will never set foot on a track, namely so owners can say 'my car is capable of this and that' whilst valet parked outside the club.
Old 08-09-2018, 10:58 PM
  #94  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,291
Received 286 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

^ Yes, but we're talking about the GT3 - the GT2RS is a different animal - one that can go after 'ring records and challenge horsepower races.
Old 08-09-2018, 11:04 PM
  #95  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,853
Likes: 0
Received 11,528 Likes on 5,055 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
^ Yes, but we're talking about the GT3 - the GT2RS is a different animal - one that can go after 'ring records and challenge horsepower races.
Can you imagine the day that the 992 GT3 is released and it has less horsepower than the 991 GT3?

The blowback -- justified or not -- would break the Internet.
Old 08-09-2018, 11:29 PM
  #96  
CAlexio
Race Director
 
CAlexio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hypercar Invitational
Posts: 10,233
Received 1,973 Likes on 917 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
​IMO the horsepower war isn't what it used to be. I think the performance car buying public is generally aware that 500+ is far more than enough for any street or track, and that in reality another 100 isn't going to make the car any faster. Besides, AP said at the last Rennsport Reunion that the focus of future GT cars would be less weight, not more power.
Tend to agree. I'm thinking:
Higher rpm NA 4.0 for 992.1 GT3.. they will tell us it's completely redesigned blah blah.. basically ecu unlocks another 500rpm.. you know when you drive your gt3.2 right now how eager the engine is to pass 9k..

992.2 gt3.. hybrid NA.
Old 08-09-2018, 11:37 PM
  #97  
Akunob
Rennlist Member
 
Akunob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,032
Received 897 Likes on 569 Posts
Default

The reality is that if Porsche doesn’t go big, they’ll gradually turn into Ferrari (who refuse to provide cars for magazine comparos or limit/manage auto press tests to control who their cars are pitted against). When you sell a car for close to $200K and it can be destroyed by a car costing a fraction of the price ($75K) sales will begin to slide and you will be forced to shift your marketing from a performance/racing pedigree based pitch to pitching cars based on exclusivity or just brand. An example is Aston Martin. Aston Martin didn’t pursue power/performance and relied on their brand to sell cars (I.e., we are THE British sports car maker with exquisite materials and aesthetic exterior design)...look where their sales and profit margins are vs. Porsche.

Porsche will always be linked to performance and weight reduction will only get you so far in a NA street car. It’s all about the numbers, when those auto comparisons and Head 2 Head matchups are published, we all look to see who’s #1. McLaren learnt a lesson and now they aren’t skipping on power (and reliability) anymore, and guess what, they are slowly closing the gap on Porsche and other high performance sport car manufacturers.
Old 08-10-2018, 12:09 AM
  #98  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,014
Received 4,941 Likes on 2,799 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CAlexio
Tend to agree. I'm thinking:
Higher rpm NA 4.0 for 992.1 GT3.. they will tell us it's completely redesigned blah blah.. basically ecu unlocks another 500rpm.. you know when you drive your gt3.2 right now how eager the engine is to pass 9k..
I like your thinking about an even higher revving NA 4.0L. But, remember that the current motor makes peak power at 8,250 rpm (power would be WAY down by 9,500 rpm). They would need to definitely do more than ECU tune (like camshafts, better breathing intakes and exhaust which could be challenging with particle filters, etc.).

~550hp @ 9k with 9,500 rpm redline would be great!
Old 08-10-2018, 12:09 AM
  #99  
fxz
Race Car
 
fxz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
Posts: 4,484
Received 436 Likes on 262 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Akunob
The reality
You confuse your opinions with reality
and the hp with performance
Old 08-10-2018, 12:26 AM
  #100  
fxz
Race Car
 
fxz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
Posts: 4,484
Received 436 Likes on 262 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG

I like your thinking about an even higher revving NA 4.0L. But, remember that the current motor makes peak power at 8,250 rpm (power would be WAY down by 9,500 rpm). They would need to definitely do more than ECU tune (like camshafts, better breathing intakes and exhaust which could be challenging with particle filters, etc.).

~550hp @ 9k with 9,500 rpm redline would be great!
Is Porsche thinking not Calexio one
Old 08-10-2018, 12:45 AM
  #101  
gago1101
Rennlist Member
 
gago1101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 836
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I’ve got to be honest, love this thread!

Bunch of Porsche GT lovers expressing what they imagine or want from future 911 GT. PAG should pay attention. I wish current Porsche was a company that acted on impulse, passion, and emotion. Unfortunately, it is a public company...
Old 08-10-2018, 12:52 AM
  #102  
evilfij
SJW, a Carin' kinda guy
Rennlist Member
 
evilfij's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the internet
Posts: 6,786
Received 621 Likes on 433 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gago1101
I’ve got to be honest, love this thread!

Bunch of Porsche GT lovers expressing what they imagine or want from future 911 GT. PAG should pay attention. I wish current Porsche was a company that acted on impulse, passion, and emotion. Unfortunately, it is a public company...
Perhaps you are not familiar with Tesla?
Old 08-10-2018, 12:58 AM
  #103  
gago1101
Rennlist Member
 
gago1101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 836
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by evilfij


Perhaps you are not familiar with Tesla?
There we go.... another wish. I wish Mr. Musk was into cars.
Old 08-10-2018, 01:12 AM
  #104  
Guest89
Drifting
 
Guest89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CHI / ATL
Posts: 2,793
Received 201 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG

I like your thinking about an even higher revving NA 4.0L. But, remember that the current motor makes peak power at 8,250 rpm (power would be WAY down by 9,500 rpm). They would need to definitely do more than ECU tune (like camshafts, better breathing intakes and exhaust which could be challenging with particle filters, etc.).

~550hp @ 9k with 9,500 rpm redline would be great!
They quote the RSR at 9500 RPM. I can’t see how a road engine with big cylinders could rev that high. The 918 redlined at 9150 RPM as I recall.

4.0/6 = 0.667
4.6/8 = 0.575
Old 08-10-2018, 01:21 AM
  #105  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,014
Received 4,941 Likes on 2,799 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Guest89


They quote the RSR at 9500 RPM. I can’t see how a road engine with big cylinders could rev that high. The 918 redlined at 9150 RPM as I recall.

4.0/6 = 0.667
4.6/8 = 0.575
Yeah, it’s a lot of mass moving very quickly. Definitely easier ways to make 550hp (like turbocharging). But not impossible...


Quick Reply: The future 911 range, including the GT3, will exclusively use turbocharged six-cylind



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:53 AM.