Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

.2RS Added Brake Cooling = trackable PCCBs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2018, 04:47 PM
  #46  
mcipseric
Three Wheelin'
 
mcipseric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,693
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

sorry 1 pound unsprung = 15.5 lbs spung equivalent. so 620 lbs total at all 4 corners.
We also need to include the performance increase do to less rotational mass of the rotor.

Last edited by mcipseric; 05-09-2018 at 05:07 PM.
Old 05-09-2018, 07:04 PM
  #47  
CDinSing
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CDinSing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 747
Received 168 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

I’ve had PCCB and iron and I prefer CCB for suspension feel and less pedal effort. The car feels lighter and more controlled on bumps, which at Sebring matters, other tracks maybe not so much. Stopping is ultimately limited by the tires but the better initial bite and lower pedal effort means I feel less beat up at the end of the weekend. I think initial bite of PCCB is better than OEM pad’s but so is Ferodo/AP rotor combo, so not sure how big a difference it will make over my normal track setup. I think the reason to do ST CCB is lower unsprung weight since rebuild cost seems comparable to iron.
Old 05-09-2018, 07:38 PM
  #48  
CDinSing
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CDinSing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 747
Received 168 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
Love GR / gold! Such a special combo and comes as-is.
Agreed Peter. I was only sold on it after watching the videos and seeing the pictures. The combo really looks great. A bit old school but so am I.
Old 05-09-2018, 10:24 PM
  #49  
Mech33
Nordschleife Master
 
Mech33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,365
Received 623 Likes on 381 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mcipseric
sorry 1 pound unsprung = 15.5 lbs spung equivalent. so 620 lbs total at all 4 corners.
We also need to include the performance increase do to less rotational mass of the rotor.
Now there is some bogus math. Acceleration-wise, removing mass at the wheels is equivalent to 2-2.5x max. So 1 lb = 2 to 2.5 pounds.

Bump rebound dynamics is a different story.
Old 05-10-2018, 02:12 AM
  #50  
CAlexio
Race Director
 
CAlexio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hypercar Invitational
Posts: 10,233
Received 1,973 Likes on 917 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by whatif
It's interesting, but I don't know if there's any data to support that PCCBs stop better. In theory the stopping distances should be same for both brakes with the limiting factor being the tires. The iron brakes should be able to provide the same amount of brake torque, just less thermal efficiency. Is it possible that it's the mental factor of you thinking that you have better brakes with PCCBs being more confidence inspiring, so you're more comfortable going deeper into the braking zone?
It's been covered before on the forum, with articles referenced where direct comparisons were made. Im not going to look up the threads or articles now, but the answer is that pccb offer more consistent fade-free performance than iron, but braking distances are the same.

The golden ticket now seems to be to spec your car with irons then buy ST rotors.
Old 05-10-2018, 03:40 AM
  #51  
SCCAForums
Pro
 
SCCAForums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Typically at a race track near you!
Posts: 720
Received 79 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CAlexio
It's been covered before on the forum, with articles referenced where direct comparisons were made. Im not going to look up the threads or articles now, but the answer is that pccb offer more consistent fade-free performance than iron, but braking distances are the same.

The golden ticket now seems to be to spec your car with irons then buy ST rotors.
Couldn't another option be spec with PCCB (higher resale value) and put on ST Rotors?
Old 05-10-2018, 10:38 AM
  #52  
CDinSing
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CDinSing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 747
Received 168 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SCCAForums
Couldn't another option be spec with PCCB (higher resale value) and put on ST Rotors?
yes, I think someone should do a comparison of for sale RS’, otherwise same optioned but iron versus PCCB and determine if the investment return is greater than putting the $9k in the market. That would really help me make a decision! 🤪
Old 05-10-2018, 06:23 PM
  #53  
whatif
Rennlist Member
 
whatif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CDinSing


yes, I think someone should do a comparison of for sale RS’, otherwise same optioned but iron versus PCCB and determine if the investment return is greater than putting the $9k in the market. That would really help me make a decision! ��

Most likely there is no "return" on the 9k investment. The return is at best 0, if not negative.

A PCCB RS should sell for more, but not more than the cost of the option.
Old 05-10-2018, 06:24 PM
  #54  
whatif
Rennlist Member
 
whatif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mech33


Now there is some bogus math. Acceleration-wise, removing mass at the wheels is equivalent to 2-2.5x max. So 1 lb = 2 to 2.5 pounds.

Bump rebound dynamics is a different story.
That sounds a lot more like it
Old 05-11-2018, 01:33 AM
  #55  
SCCAForums
Pro
 
SCCAForums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Typically at a race track near you!
Posts: 720
Received 79 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by whatif
Most likely there is no "return" on the 9k investment. The return is at best 0, if not negative.

A PCCB RS should sell for more, but not more than the cost of the option.
I think this is right, what I meant was more along the lines with an RS (or a GT3 for that matter) it seems the 'asking price' is always 'based on' the MSRP of the car... so while you may not 'get more'... you don't 'get less'... and you typically have a broader audience (appeal) to sell the car.

If you're never selling the car, tracking exclusively, then no need... but if you're only keeping until the 'next one' comes along... some of the options are more important for mass appeal (IMO).

Best Regards,
Dave
Old 05-11-2018, 09:12 AM
  #56  
mdrums
Race Director
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 180 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
OEM calipers are same, except the body of the yellow calipers has a shape that acts similar to an integrated spacer which lets it work with the larger diameter rotors. It is not possible to use the smaller iron rotors with PCCB calipers for this reason, but you can add a spacer to the red calipers to work with larger rotors.
Thanks Grant...so how are these guys that get PCCB using iron rotors? I’m guessing there are aftermarket iron rotors...bigger than stock own gt3 rotors....that fit the PCCB caliper?
Old 05-11-2018, 11:41 AM
  #57  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,014
Received 4,941 Likes on 2,799 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mdrums

Thanks Grant...so how are these guys that get PCCB using iron rotors? I’m guessing there are aftermarket iron rotors...bigger than stock own gt3 rotors....that fit the PCCB caliper?
Correct - you need to use some manhole covers (410mm front 390mm rear iron rotors - OEM irons are 380/380 mm) - Girodisc is one of the more common options:

http://www.girodisc.com/Girodisc-Fro...rs_p_6677.html

http://www.girodisc.com/Girodisc-Rea...rs_p_6678.html
Old 05-11-2018, 11:44 AM
  #58  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,382
Received 1,628 Likes on 755 Posts
Default

I wonder what the total weight difference is per corner for the worst case scenario (20-21" std wheels with MPSC and extra large steel rotor from PCCB concersion) VS best case scenario (Magnesium wheels / 19" wheels with Hoosiers and PCCB rotors).
Someone should weigh it out.
Old 05-11-2018, 01:35 PM
  #59  
race7117
Burning Brakes
 
race7117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,101
Received 91 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
I wonder what the total weight difference is per corner for the worst case scenario (20-21" std wheels with MPSC and extra large steel rotor from PCCB concersion) VS best case scenario (Magnesium wheels / 19" wheels with Hoosiers and PCCB rotors).
Someone should weigh it out.
My understanding is that the Girodiscs are very similar in weight to the standard steels even though they are larger diameter.
Old 05-17-2018, 05:43 PM
  #60  
AutoQuest Motorsports
Former Vendor
 
AutoQuest Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fort Myers, Florida
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by usctrojanGT3
What about brake pads...didn't you have to get different pads for the ST rotors vs. the steel rotors?
Pagid pad shape for the factory iron rotors (380 F/R) is 4924 F and 4945 R. On a conversion to our ST ceramic rotors (410 F/400 R) the pad shape on the front changes to 4927 (the same as factory PCCB equipped cars) and the rear stays the same at 4925 (also the factory PCCB equipped shape).



Quick Reply: .2RS Added Brake Cooling = trackable PCCBs?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:49 AM.