991.2 GT3 6MT Dyno....The proof is in the pudding!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

04-13-2018 | 05:18 PM

#16

Dr.Bill

Race Car

Joined: Jan 2008

Posts: 4,690

Likes: 726

From: Scottsdale, AZ

It's "The proof of the pudding is in the eating".
But impressive numbers nonetheless.

Reply Like

04-13-2018 | 05:48 PM

#17

drdonger

Thread Starter

Three Wheelin'

Joined: Feb 2015

Posts: 1,751

Likes: 39

From: Dallas, TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by GT3 KSA

@ OP glad i see another reference for mustang dyno. My .1 with DMS headers did 446 rwhp and 301 rwtq. You said .1 did about under 400 rwhp, do you know what the .1 did in terms of rwtq?

.1’s were putting down 395-405 rwhp stock. Not sure how much yours put down stock versus with Dundon. I know the Dundon .1 RS’s put down 430 rwhp stock and 450 with dundon race headers.

Reply Like

04-13-2018 | 05:50 PM

#18

drdonger

Thread Starter

Three Wheelin'

Joined: Feb 2015

Posts: 1,751

Likes: 39

From: Dallas, TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr.Bill

It's "The proof of the pudding is in the eating".
But impressive numbers nonetheless.

Modern twist to an old proverb

Reply Like

04-13-2018 | 06:26 PM

#19

Nine1won

Rennlist Member

Joined: Jun 2014

Posts: 994

Likes: 75

From: Newport Beach

They're always conservative. The new GT2 RS is putting out 683 rwhp! Prob close to 800hp at the crank vs 700hp claimed. Wow

Reply Like

04-13-2018 | 06:52 PM

#20

GT3 KSA

Three Wheelin'

Joined: Feb 2016

Posts: 1,746

Likes: 177

Quote:

Originally Posted by drdonger

.1’s were putting down 395-405 rwhp stock. Not sure how much yours put down stock versus with Dundon. I know the Dundon .1 RS’s put down 430 rwhp stock and 450 with dundon race headers.

Don't mean to hijack your post but any idea what the torque figures were on the stock .1s?

Reply Like

04-13-2018 | 07:06 PM

#21

GT3

Three Wheelin'

Joined: Jun 2009

Posts: 1,921

Likes: 308

Quote:

Originally Posted by GT3 KSA

Don't mean to hijack your post but any idea what the torque figures were on the stock .1s?

Around 300 wtq (or just under), if I remember correctly. Very similar the the 997.2 GT3.

Reply Like

04-13-2018 | 07:37 PM

#22

meaker

Three Wheelin'

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 1,750

Likes: 14

From: Charlotte,NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmy-D

What is the surprise?? AP said that is was 500HP but those figures were ver conservative

But WOW!!

The torque I truly believe because there is a big difference from the .1. This engine is considerably different/ feeling than my 2014 991

This is is a very Special engine. Based on this info if one has a .1 RS and can get a .2 RS at MSRP they should jump on it.

You make it hard for us still waiting on their cars.

Reply Like

04-13-2018 | 07:43 PM

#23

meaker

Three Wheelin'

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 1,750

Likes: 14

From: Charlotte,NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by mwar99

"Keeping up" is not just about power. You need to be able to drive too...

This ^^^

Reply Like

04-13-2018 | 09:55 PM

#24

SCCAForums

Pro

Joined: Apr 2017

Posts: 720

Likes: 79

From: Typically at a race track near you!

Glad to see another manual back up the numbers. Mustang Dyno's can be programmed to 'read' like DynoJets, which looks like yours is, which is easier to compare.

Mine made 460 Rwhp / 331 Rwtq... the torque in these cars are truly amazing.

https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...pd-manual.html

Best Regards,
Dave

Reply Like

04-13-2018 | 09:55 PM

#25

Jimmy-D

Rennlist Member

Joined: Mar 2014

Posts: 11,298

Likes: 1,496

From: Midwest

Quote:

Originally Posted by meaker

You make it hard for us still waiting on their cars.

Sorry- worth the wait.

Car starts to wake up after the first 500 miles. Was really cranky for the first few hundred miles

Reply Like

04-13-2018 | 11:22 PM

#26

drdonger

Thread Starter

Three Wheelin'

Joined: Feb 2015

Posts: 1,751

Likes: 39

From: Dallas, TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by GT3 KSA

Don't mean to hijack your post but any idea what the torque figures were on the stock .1s?

I didn’t ask. Sorry

Reply Like

04-13-2018 | 11:24 PM

#27

drdonger

Thread Starter

Three Wheelin'

Joined: Feb 2015

Posts: 1,751

Likes: 39

From: Dallas, TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCCAForums

Very similar numbers. I’m sure I’d be closer to yours wih the half tank of 100 octane. 👍

Reply Like

04-14-2018 | 12:05 AM

#28

SCCAForums

Pro

Joined: Apr 2017

Posts: 720

Likes: 79

From: Typically at a race track near you!

Quote:

Originally Posted by drdonger

Very similar numbers. I’m sure I’d be closer to yours wih the half tank of 100 octane. 👍

Agreed! 👍

Reply Like

04-14-2018 | 12:07 AM

#29

Raghu

Pro

Joined: Dec 2015

Posts: 556

Likes: 181

From: Texas

I have a .1 RS and just got my PTS MT .2 GT3. I have put about 125 miles on GT3 and 5400 miles on .1 RS. Haven't got the GT3 above 4500 RPM yet but I can already see some differences. .2 GT3 pulls harder at lower RPM and lower gears. It has a firmer suspension. Steering responsiveness is about equal. The power shifting actually works! The engine note is sublime! I don't know how it will compare at higher RPM yet. Will find out soon!

Reply Like