Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: PCCB or Steel Brakes on your 991 GT3?
PCCBs, the car is for street driving only.
150
22.76%
PCCBs, and I'll track it that way too.
148
22.46%
PCCB, but buying steel rotors or system for track.
44
6.68%
Steel brakes, it's the way I roll.
317
48.10%
Voters: 659. You may not vote on this poll

PCCB or Steel on your 991 GT3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-2014, 07:09 PM
  #136  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,959
Received 339 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

^^^ Genius!
Old 07-27-2014, 03:11 PM
  #137  
Dlff
Advanced
 
Dlff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

PCCB or no PCCB & that is the question I have been asking myself. PCCB's advantages are lower weight & brake dust free. As far as stopping power is concerned I don't think & I maybe wrong here there is not much difference as Porsche is very well known when it comes to stopping power. Coming back to lower weight I doubt if I can really feel the difference in weight difference as I don't claim to be an expert driver. I have driven both the 991 GT3 & TTS equipped with PCCB on track. Honestly speaking I can't really tell if it stops better than steel. If I'm not lazy enuf to clean the wheels & enjoy cleaning my pride & joy then brake dust is not an issue. I think at the end of the day is just a question of whether you are willing to spend so much for the PCCB. Also is it true that PCCB is not covered by warranty?
With the money that you can spend on the PCCB wouldn't it be better to take up a couple of individual Porsche Driving Course?
Old 07-27-2014, 04:48 PM
  #138  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dlff
PCCB or no PCCB & that is the question I have been asking myself. PCCB's advantages are lower weight & brake dust free. As far as stopping power is concerned I don't think & I maybe wrong here there is not much difference as Porsche is very well known when it comes to stopping power. Coming back to lower weight I doubt if I can really feel the difference in weight difference as I don't claim to be an expert driver. I have driven both the 991 GT3 & TTS equipped with PCCB on track. Honestly speaking I can't really tell if it stops better than steel. If I'm not lazy enuf to clean the wheels & enjoy cleaning my pride & joy then brake dust is not an issue. I think at the end of the day is just a question of whether you are willing to spend so much for the PCCB. Also is it true that PCCB is not covered by warranty?
With the money that you can spend on the PCCB wouldn't it be better to take up a couple of individual Porsche Driving Course?
It's not true that PCCB's aren't covered by warranty. Also, I don't mind cleaning my pride and joy but having wheels that look dirty again after 30 miles of driving is annoying.

Just musing here, but I find the argument about weight interesting. I've read plenty of posts from people bragging about their new big-dollar lightweight wheels that save 3 or 4 pounds each, and how they can feel the difference in acceleration or handling. But save 8 pounds or so a wheel with PCCB's and all of a sudden saving that much un-sprung weight is insignificant.

I think it just goes to show that we tend to find ways to justify how we do or don't spend our money.
Old 07-27-2014, 05:28 PM
  #139  
Bill_C4S
Burning Brakes
 
Bill_C4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA

I think it just goes to show that we tend to find ways to justify how we do or don't spend our money.
on this side of the pond....its termed Man-Maths

"noun, plural: the process of making the hopelessly unaffordable seem unequivocally financially logical. See also; self-denial, head in sand, massive balloon"

cf: http://www.shotdeadinthehead.com/pis...s-t-shirt.html
Old 08-01-2014, 02:10 PM
  #140  
Terrence
Rennlist Member
 
Terrence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 943
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

I did it for clean wheels and lighter weight. I had a 2007 GT3RS, and when I changed from stock wheels to identical size but lighter Kinesis 1-piece forged wheels along with PCCB, boy did I feel the difference even at moderate speeds in the canyons. The car stopped way earlier than before and the car behind me got so close I was stunned. I had to recalibrate my senses and brake later from there on. I want my GT3 (being the highest overall-performing street Porsche available now) to have the best spec and best possible performance possible, and thus PCCB was a given.
After all, my 458 came with ceramics as standard (all Ferraris since 2008 has ceramics standard). I think it is the best possible street brakes with money not being a factor. On the track, it should still outperform all steel brakes except that it will cost a lot more to replace after heavy track use.
Old 08-01-2014, 02:11 PM
  #141  
Terrence
Rennlist Member
 
Terrence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 943
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
It's not true that PCCB's aren't covered by warranty. Also, I don't mind cleaning my pride and joy but having wheels that look dirty again after 30 miles of driving is annoying.

Just musing here, but I find the argument about weight interesting. I've read plenty of posts from people bragging about their new big-dollar lightweight wheels that save 3 or 4 pounds each, and how they can feel the difference in acceleration or handling. But save 8 pounds or so a wheel with PCCB's and all of a sudden saving that much un-sprung weight is insignificant.

I think it just goes to show that we tend to find ways to justify how we do or don't spend our money.
Exactly.
Old 08-01-2014, 08:02 PM
  #142  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill_C4S
on this side of the pond....its termed Man-Maths "noun, plural: the process of making the hopelessly unaffordable seem unequivocally financially logical. See also; self-denial, head in sand, massive balloon" cf: http://www.shotdeadinthehead.com/pis...s-t-shirt.html
Got that T shirt Bill and wearing it today LOL!
Old 08-03-2014, 01:27 AM
  #143  
Terrence
Rennlist Member
 
Terrence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 943
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Just found out from the article in Excellence magazine that the PCCB is 40 lbs lighter than the steel ones! 40 lbs less in unstrung weight. Wow! That totally makes it worthwhile for me on a car like this.
Old 08-03-2014, 01:37 AM
  #144  
0Q991
Drifting
 
0Q991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,743
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Terrence
Just found out from the article in Excellence magazine that the PCCB is 40 lbs lighter than the steel ones! 40 lbs less in unstrung weight. Wow! That totally makes it worthwhile for me on a car like this.
Wow, really?!?! That seems like a much greater weight savings than precious gens of PCCB?
Old 08-03-2014, 01:54 AM
  #145  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Terrence
Just found out from the article in Excellence magazine that the PCCB is 40 lbs lighter than the steel ones! 40 lbs less in unstrung weight. Wow! That totally makes it worthwhile for me on a car like this.
Originally Posted by 0Q991
Wow, really?!?! That seems like a much greater weight savings than precious gens of PCCB?
We've discussed this before. Porsche has claimed a 10 lb savings per corner with PCCBs in the past. The question is, when comparing the stock 380mm cast iron 991 GT3 rotor to the new 3rd generation 410mm ceramic ones, does the larger ceramic rotor eat into that weight difference, or is it still 10 lbs? Doing a little back of the napkin math, the assumption was that the difference might be down to around 8 lbs, which is still a lot.

I don't know which Excellence article Terence is referring to so maybe they've measured in real life. It's just that sometimes Porsche's marketing guys haven't caught up with the latest info, as we've seen from some of the mistakes on the website. It would be nice if we had actual weights of the two different rotors for a valid comparison.
Old 08-03-2014, 02:06 AM
  #146  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
Just musing here, but I find the argument about weight interesting. I've read plenty of posts from people bragging about their new big-dollar lightweight wheels that save 3 or 4 pounds each, and how they can feel the difference in acceleration or handling. But save 8 pounds or so a wheel with PCCB's and all of a sudden saving that much un-sprung weight is insignificant.

I think it just goes to show that we tend to find ways to justify how we do or don't spend our money.
+1. Very true. Just don't forget it applies to those that purchase pccb as well.

Originally Posted by Terrence
I did it for clean wheels and lighter weight. I had a 2007 GT3RS, and when I changed from stock wheels to identical size but lighter Kinesis 1-piece forged wheels along with PCCB, boy did I feel the difference even at moderate speeds in the canyons. The car stopped way earlier than before and the car behind me got so close I was stunned. I had to recalibrate my senses and brake later from there on. I want my GT3 (being the highest overall-performing street Porsche available now) to have the best spec and best possible performance possible, and thus PCCB was a given.
After all, my 458 came with ceramics as standard (all Ferraris since 2008 has ceramics standard). I think it is the best possible street brakes with money not being a factor. On the track, it should still outperform all steel brakes except that it will cost a lot more to replace after heavy track use.
Never underestimate the power of placebo. The performance advantages of PCCB are not seen on the street except when hitting potholes.
https://rennlist.com/forums/11501283-post103.html

Originally Posted by Terrence
Just found out from the article in Excellence magazine that the PCCB is 40 lbs lighter than the steel ones! 40 lbs less in unstrung weight. Wow! That totally makes it worthwhile for me on a car like this.
Because....? btw, it's unsprung, not unstrung.

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
We've discussed this before. Porsche has claimed a 10 lb savings per corner with PCCBs in the past. The question is, when comparing the stock 380mm cast iron 991 GT3 rotor to the new 3rd generation 410mm ceramic ones, does the larger ceramic rotor eat into that weight difference, or is it still 10 lbs? Doing a little back of the napkin math, the assumption was that the difference might be down to around 8 lbs, which is still a lot.

I don't know which Excellence article Terence is referring to so maybe they've measured in real life. It's just that sometimes Porsche's marketing guys haven't caught up with the latest info, as we've seen from some of the mistakes on the website. It would be nice if we had actual weights of the two different rotors for a valid comparison.
Mike makes a good point. I remember a discussion in the 987 forum about Porsche's claimed weight savings with PCCB, but after taking into account the larger caliper size, rotors, and hardware that comes with a PCCB setup, the savings turned out to be almost nil.
Old 08-03-2014, 02:08 AM
  #147  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Mike. My Tech said he had enquired for a customer (about confirm build options on a new GT3) via PAG back in February and there was no conclusive answer (frustrating at the time) but that one of discs in part inventory were weighed against a 380mm steel disc and the difference was less than 3kg (6.5lb). The PCCB disc is not only larger but also thicker. The tech thought the difference at the rear would be even less as the stock steel disc is thinner (apparently). So maybe 22lb all round. Its still unsprung weight however so still good to save!
Old 08-03-2014, 02:11 AM
  #148  
reidry
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
reidry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Cocoa, FL
Posts: 1,633
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
We've discussed this before. Porsche has claimed a 10 lb savings per corner with PCCBs in the past. The question is, when comparing the stock 380mm cast iron 991 GT3 rotor to the new 3rd generation 410mm ceramic ones, does the larger ceramic rotor eat into that weight difference, or is it still 10 lbs? Doing a little back of the napkin math, the assumption was that the difference might be down to around 8 lbs, which is still a lot.

I don't know which Excellence article Terence is referring to so maybe they've measured in real life. It's just that sometimes Porsche's marketing guys haven't caught up with the latest info, as we've seen from some of the mistakes on the website. It would be nice if we had actual weights of the two different rotors for a valid comparison.
And if, after you decide on the PCCBs, the track bug bits and you buy a set of shiney 410mm PCCB sized steel rotors you'll end up with more weight than the 380mm steels.

The ceramics, no matter how you cut it, are fragile, they can have balance problems (Corvette ZR1), and they have to be weighed to assess current condition. One of the vendors even sells an aluminum guide so you don't ding a $5k rotor while reinstalling a wheel.

I'm a steel brakes kind of guy. Steel brakes are durable and hold up to repeated abuse on the street and on the track. While Porsche brake is high, steel rotors are fairly reasonable at about $500 per corner.

The topic has been pretty beaten to death, it just depends on your priorities. Personally I can't afford the $$ for rotors to get the clean wheels and slightly lower unspung weight.

Ryan
Old 08-03-2014, 02:12 AM
  #149  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

btw, I don't have a problem with PCCB and people optioning with PCCB. If you like it, go for it. I just have a problem with a lot of the misinformation and misconceptions about the technology.
Old 08-03-2014, 02:16 AM
  #150  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
Mike. My Tech said he had enquired for a customer (about confirm build options on a new GT3) via PAG back in February and there was no conclusive answer (frustrating at the time) but that one of discs in part inventory were weighed against a 380mm steel disc and the difference was less than 3kg (6.5lb). The PCCB disc is not only larger but also thicker. The tech thought the difference at the rear would be even less as the stock steel disc is thinner (apparently). So maybe 22lb all round. Its still unsprung weight however so still good to save!
Maybe less than 22lb. Is it safe to assume that the larger PCCB calipers weigh more than the standard ones?


Quick Reply: PCCB or Steel on your 991 GT3?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:23 PM.