BMW M Coupe vs. Porsche Cayman S
#16
Instructor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That profile view of the M version of the Z4 coupe is not flattering at all. There are better angles for that design. No matter, the Cayman still has miles on the Z4 in terms of design.
====
What has been baffling to me is the polar reviews of the Cayman S versus the Z4 M coupe. I remember reading how Car and Driver said the Cayman S is the more capable track car, while Autoweek said the track time easliy went to the Z4M. <shrug> I imagine that has more to do with driving styles, but still surprised me that it could be seen as so drastically different.
====
What has been baffling to me is the polar reviews of the Cayman S versus the Z4 M coupe. I remember reading how Car and Driver said the Cayman S is the more capable track car, while Autoweek said the track time easliy went to the Z4M. <shrug> I imagine that has more to do with driving styles, but still surprised me that it could be seen as so drastically different.
#17
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think you're right as well as they type of track they tested them on. My guess is the BMW might have an edge on a long track with a lot of straights where the Porsche may have the advantage on a more technical track with more corners and less long straights.
#18
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by ringmeister
I think you're right as well as they type of track they tested them on. My guess is the BMW might have an edge on a long track with a lot of straights where the Porsche may have the advantage on a more technical track with more corners and less long straights.
#19
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That's encouraging, I would have thought the M coupe would pull on the Cayman. A friend is getting the M coupe so I'll have a chance to drive it back to back with my Cay next season at Watkins Glen.
#20
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by ringmeister
That's encouraging, I would have thought the M coupe would pull on the Cayman. A friend is getting the M coupe so I'll have a chance to drive it back to back with my Cay next season at Watkins Glen.
#21
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by MrClean
What has been baffling to me is the polar reviews of the Cayman S versus the Z4 M coupe. I remember reading how Car and Driver said the Cayman S is the more capable track car, while Autoweek said the track time easliy went to the Z4M. <shrug> I imagine that has more to do with driving styles, but still surprised me that it could be seen as so drastically different.
[IMO, the M Coupe is a car that is more prone to overstreer and in which it is not difficult for a novice to induce big slip angles. The Cayman may be harder to drive to that limit, but most likely is considerably faster when driven by someone with talent. Comments -- Mooty?]
At best, that Autoweek aritcle was an unfortunate lapse in that magazine's standards. At worst, the track writeup was an intentional bone thrown to BMW avoid having its Z4 thing look bad. Autoweek should've fessed up to what other magazines have admitted; the Cayman is a much better car, but you can get the M Coupe for a lot less money, which matters to a lot of people.
#22
Instructor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Dr. Car
Oh, oh, oh. That Autoweek article's discussion about track time was complete and utter garbage. They offered up no lap times, let alone any GPS data. It apparently was just based on feel, but they never admitted to this. To non-expert drivers, I am sure that the competent mid-engine balance of the Cayman *feels* less exciting and not as fast as the M-coupe's oversteering hijinks, but that sort of analysis is neither helpful nor professional. That "feel" should be discussed in conjunction with analysis of how the cars *actually perform.*
[IMO, the M Coupe is a car that is more prone to overstreer and in which it is not difficult for a novice to induce big slip angles. The Cayman may be harder to drive to that limit, but most likely is considerably faster when driven by someone with talent. Comments -- Mooty?]
At best, that Autoweek aritcle was an unfortunate lapse in that magazine's standards. At worst, the track writeup was an intentional bone thrown to BMW avoid having its Z4 thing look bad. Autoweek should've fessed up to what other magazines have admitted; the Cayman is a much better car, but you can get the M Coupe for a lot less money, which matters to a lot of people.
#23
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Car & Driver = SUVs and minivans
Autoweek = gossip
Road & Track = the real deal for sports cars
Here's Road & Track's comparo:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=3823
"The BMW feels like an engine with a chassis, and the Porsche feels like a chassis with an engine." - Andrew Bornhop
Autoweek = gossip
Road & Track = the real deal for sports cars
Here's Road & Track's comparo:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=3823
"The BMW feels like an engine with a chassis, and the Porsche feels like a chassis with an engine." - Andrew Bornhop
#25
Instructor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by JEC_31
"The BMW feels like an engine with a chassis, and the Porsche feels like a chassis with an engine." - Andrew Bornhop
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Thanks for the link too!
#26
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by T951
I think the Z4 is 3rd most hideous vehicle, behind the pontiac aztek and the buick skyhawk in the last 15 years...
I will never forget the letter that Car & Driver printed - it was an open apology to the owner of the Aztek parked at ____ mall for getting vomit on the fender. It was unavoidable, he wrote, due to the extreme ugliness of the car.
#27
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by MrClean
Interestingly true. ![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Thanks for the link too!
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Thanks for the link too!
Welcome. I subscribe, and read the heck out of that article. I value that 'zine for it's writers who know how to drive (and don't write so bad either).
#28
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thought I'd offer a dissenting opinion. I love the Z4 M Coupe. As a one-time owner of a '99 M Coupe (the shoe, bread van etc.) I am a little biased, of course. It put a massive smile on my face every time I drove it - over a 7 year period. I remember test driving a pre-owned 993 half way into owning the MC, and it just couldn't compare. The 993's handling felt sloppy, the interior cheap/plasticky and the brakes awful. I loved that BMW. Unfortunately I sold it recently, and now regret it.
Why did I buy it in the first place: performance and uniqueness. Porsche didn't produce anything in that price range, and its performance was (quite frankly) not far off a 911's (the 996) in the lower mph ranges...
The Z4 M IMHO is significantly better looking, and the quality of the interior appears to have been much improved. I haven't driven it, but I hear it's even more fun to drive than my old MC - which is hard to imagine. I hear it has a certain rawness to it, which is immensely appealing.
As for the Cayman - well, it's a great car. I test drove a CS on whim at a local dealer last week, and emerged a big fan. So much so that I contemplated getting one. I actually don't think the Cayman is better looking - just different. I'm not a big fan of the bubble that is the roof line, but like most other aspects of the car. It certainly handles well, and the engine sound is terrific. I would buy it over the Z4 M. That's an astounding revelation as before the test drive I was firm in my belief that the Cayman was a wannabe 911 for posers.
Anyway, having added the options I'd want to a new CS, I don't think I can justify forking out that kind of money for the Cayman. I'd rather save my pennies for a 997 S or 4S.
What's the moral of the story? Not sure there is one, other than I think both the Z4 MC and Cayman are great cars with close to equal appeal. Those who knock the Z4 M should drive one.
I can almost guarantee that any dissenters will quickly grow the like (if not love) it once driven. You will quickly forgive its quirky design, just like I forgave the Cayman its image and status amongst non-Porsche owners.
Why did I buy it in the first place: performance and uniqueness. Porsche didn't produce anything in that price range, and its performance was (quite frankly) not far off a 911's (the 996) in the lower mph ranges...
The Z4 M IMHO is significantly better looking, and the quality of the interior appears to have been much improved. I haven't driven it, but I hear it's even more fun to drive than my old MC - which is hard to imagine. I hear it has a certain rawness to it, which is immensely appealing.
As for the Cayman - well, it's a great car. I test drove a CS on whim at a local dealer last week, and emerged a big fan. So much so that I contemplated getting one. I actually don't think the Cayman is better looking - just different. I'm not a big fan of the bubble that is the roof line, but like most other aspects of the car. It certainly handles well, and the engine sound is terrific. I would buy it over the Z4 M. That's an astounding revelation as before the test drive I was firm in my belief that the Cayman was a wannabe 911 for posers.
Anyway, having added the options I'd want to a new CS, I don't think I can justify forking out that kind of money for the Cayman. I'd rather save my pennies for a 997 S or 4S.
What's the moral of the story? Not sure there is one, other than I think both the Z4 MC and Cayman are great cars with close to equal appeal. Those who knock the Z4 M should drive one.
I can almost guarantee that any dissenters will quickly grow the like (if not love) it once driven. You will quickly forgive its quirky design, just like I forgave the Cayman its image and status amongst non-Porsche owners.
#29
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by nhs156
Thought I'd offer a dissenting opinion. I love the Z4 M Coupe. As a one-time owner of a '99 M Coupe (the shoe, bread van etc.) I am a little biased, of course. It put a massive smile on my face every time I drove it - over a 7 year period. I remember test driving a pre-owned 993 half way into owning the MC, and it just couldn't compare. The 993's handling felt sloppy, the interior cheap/plasticky and the brakes awful. I loved that BMW. Unfortunately I sold it recently, and now regret it.
Why did I buy it in the first place: performance and uniqueness. Porsche didn't produce anything in that price range, and its performance was (quite frankly) not far off a 911's (the 996) in the lower mph ranges...
The Z4 M IMHO is significantly better looking, and the quality of the interior appears to have been much improved. I haven't driven it, but I hear it's even more fun to drive than my old MC - which is hard to imagine. I hear it has a certain rawness to it, which is immensely appealing.
As for the Cayman - well, it's a great car. I test drove a CS on whim at a local dealer last week, and emerged a big fan. So much so that I contemplated getting one. I actually don't think the Cayman is better looking - just different. I'm not a big fan of the bubble that is the roof line, but like most other aspects of the car. It certainly handles well, and the engine sound is terrific. I would buy it over the Z4 M. That's an astounding revelation as before the test drive I was firm in my belief that the Cayman was a wannabe 911 for posers.
Anyway, having added the options I'd want to a new CS, I don't think I can justify forking out that kind of money for the Cayman. I'd rather save my pennies for a 997 S or 4S.
What's the moral of the story? Not sure there is one, other than I think both the Z4 MC and Cayman are great cars with close to equal appeal. Those who knock the Z4 M should drive one.
I can almost guarantee that any dissenters will quickly grow the like (if not love) it once driven. You will quickly forgive its quirky design, just like I forgave the Cayman its image and status amongst non-Porsche owners.
Why did I buy it in the first place: performance and uniqueness. Porsche didn't produce anything in that price range, and its performance was (quite frankly) not far off a 911's (the 996) in the lower mph ranges...
The Z4 M IMHO is significantly better looking, and the quality of the interior appears to have been much improved. I haven't driven it, but I hear it's even more fun to drive than my old MC - which is hard to imagine. I hear it has a certain rawness to it, which is immensely appealing.
As for the Cayman - well, it's a great car. I test drove a CS on whim at a local dealer last week, and emerged a big fan. So much so that I contemplated getting one. I actually don't think the Cayman is better looking - just different. I'm not a big fan of the bubble that is the roof line, but like most other aspects of the car. It certainly handles well, and the engine sound is terrific. I would buy it over the Z4 M. That's an astounding revelation as before the test drive I was firm in my belief that the Cayman was a wannabe 911 for posers.
Anyway, having added the options I'd want to a new CS, I don't think I can justify forking out that kind of money for the Cayman. I'd rather save my pennies for a 997 S or 4S.
What's the moral of the story? Not sure there is one, other than I think both the Z4 MC and Cayman are great cars with close to equal appeal. Those who knock the Z4 M should drive one.
I can almost guarantee that any dissenters will quickly grow the like (if not love) it once driven. You will quickly forgive its quirky design, just like I forgave the Cayman its image and status amongst non-Porsche owners.
I loved the old m coupe so much I just bought a 99 myself!
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
As for the 99M, I plan on keeping that thing until the wheels fall off. Nothing new will ever have the raw feeling of that car, including a 993 for a lot more.
#30
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm sorry but the Z4 is one ugly car. I don't care if it was twice as fast as the Cayman I would never consider it. It has such ungainly proportions. BMW missed the styling mark on this one.