Notices
981 Forum Discussions of the 3rd Gen Boxster and 2nd Gen Cayman (2012-2016)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

981 S Engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2012, 02:52 PM
  #1  
kosmo
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
kosmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THE Republic
Posts: 10,594
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default 981 S Engine

its makes 315hp vs 350 in the base 991?
what are the differences? Was there a powerkit/x-51 option on the previous gen Boxsters S'?
Old 06-07-2012, 03:24 PM
  #2  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 801 Likes on 465 Posts
Default

I would also be curious to know the differences since the same engine was used on the 987.2 S. Unfortunately didn't offer an X-51 kit for the 987, I bet it would have been EXTREMELY popular if they had.

I know I would have probably gone for it.
Old 06-07-2012, 04:53 PM
  #3  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,270
Received 259 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

No 'Powerkit' on the 987, however the Spyder had 320hp and the Cayman R had 330hp from the same 3.4 motor.
Old 06-07-2012, 06:04 PM
  #4  
caveatesq1
Intermediate
 
caveatesq1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank the purists and marketing department at Porsche - No way they are going to let the Boxster/Cayman step on the toes of the cash cow that is the 911. Base 911 will always be more powerful than top line 981.
Old 06-07-2012, 07:59 PM
  #5  
jwade
Rennlist Member
 
jwade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Clarksville, Tn
Posts: 143
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I'm interested in seeing what the boy's over at IPD and Softronic come up with. Just a matter of time.
Old 06-08-2012, 09:05 AM
  #6  
kosmo
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
kosmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THE Republic
Posts: 10,594
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

so the new more, expensive boxster gets less power vs the previous gen RS and spyder? SO basically the boxster gets a detuned 911 engine. Thats so BS. As i recall the Boxster's chassis could easily handle another 100hp. Cant believe P is leaving money on the table buy not offering a powerkit. disappointing.

Last edited by kosmo; 06-09-2012 at 11:19 PM.
Old 06-08-2012, 09:25 AM
  #7  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 801 Likes on 465 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kosmo
so the new more, expensive boxster gets less power vs the pervious gen RS and spyder? SO basically the boxster gets a detuned 911 engine. Thats so BS. As i recall the Boxster's chassis could easily handle another 100hp. Can believe P is leaving money on the table buy not offering a powerkit. disappointing.
Join the club
Old 06-08-2012, 02:33 PM
  #8  
Byprodriver
Rennlist Member
 
Byprodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: So.CA
Posts: 3,454
Received 173 Likes on 135 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marine Blue
I would also be curious to know the differences since the same engine was used on the 987.2 S. Unfortunately didn't offer an X-51 kit for the 987, I bet it would have been EXTREMELY popular if they had.

I know I would have probably gone for it.
X-51 option for 996 cost $16,000 so I don't think it would have been too popular for boxsters.
Old 06-08-2012, 04:22 PM
  #9  
Macster
Race Director
 
Macster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Centerton, AR
Posts: 19,034
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 217 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kosmo
so the new more, expensive boxster gets less power vs the pervious gen RS and spyder? SO basically the boxster gets a detuned 911 engine. Thats so BS. As i recall the Boxster's chassis could easily handle another 100hp. Can believe P is leaving money on the table buy not offering a powerkit. disappointing.
My WAG is Porsche makes way more money selling more powerful/expensive cars than it would offering a power kit for the Boxster/Cayman models.

Different strokes for different folks but too much hp in the Boxster (or Cayman) would detract from the car.

For instance more power means more cooling is needed, thus more radiator, more hoses, lines, coolant. Higher speeds means larger (heavier) brakes.

To withstand the power a heavier drivetrain/suspension will be needed.

The car's chassis/tub would get heavier from more bracing.

The car would of course gain HP but gain weight and lose something in the process.

I have an 02 Boxster 2.7l car and while the thing is not as fast as my 03 Turbo, it is a pleasure to drive and in some cases feels 'quicker' than the Turbo.

The Turbo seems to take forever to shift while with the Boxster I can upshift very quickly and the let up in acceleration is very brief compared to the Turbo.

Also, the Boxster is lighter on its tires and easier to drive around town. And it ain't shabby out on the highway either.

Sure there are faster cars but none I say none as balanced as the Boxster.

Sincerely,

Macster.
Old 06-08-2012, 09:26 PM
  #10  
medtech
Drifting
 
medtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cali
Posts: 2,727
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The main difference is CASH, lots and lots of CASH
Old 06-10-2012, 09:22 PM
  #11  
10 GT3
Drifting
 
10 GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kosmo
its makes 315hp vs 350 in the base 991?
what are the differences? Was there a powerkit/x-51 option on the previous gen Boxsters S'?
981 gets a much more restrictive exhaust than a 991 and ECU tuning is likely to be different. Long blocks are the same between the 2 cars. Performance numbers for the new 981 S match the numbers of the 991 C2 Cab due to the much lower weight, so it makes it a lot harder this go around to spend the extra money on the 991 C2 Cab. No 981 ever had a factory powerkit and probably never will.



Quick Reply: 981 S Engine



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:28 AM.