Notices
981 Forum Discussions of the 3rd Gen Boxster and 2nd Gen Cayman (2012-2016)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Maximum camber on a 981

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2018, 11:03 PM
  #1  
Drew_K
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Drew_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,003
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Maximum camber on a 981

Anyone know the maximum camber you can get from a 981? I have a 2013 Boxster S with PASM and am thinking about adjusting the suspension, but the max camber is small, I probably won't bother.
Old 08-05-2018, 11:07 PM
  #2  
Schmidts Cat
Rennlist Member
 
Schmidts Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Danville, California
Posts: 1,197
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just do LCAs on the 987. You can get around 4 degrees or more. Not that you’ll need that much.
Old 08-06-2018, 09:05 AM
  #3  
PorscheAddict
Rennlist Member
 
PorscheAddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,255
Received 122 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Can probably get -1.5 with PASM, at least -1.0. It's not really worth messing with without camber plates or LCA's, as pointed out above. -1.5 will still leave your outside edges getting eaten alive if you drive hard at the track.
Old 08-06-2018, 09:07 AM
  #4  
Scooby921
Racer
 
Scooby921's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Michigan
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

What do you consider small? I think the factory settings on my PASM equipped 981 GTS was -1.0° in the front and -1.5° in the rear. Front also has +8° of caster. When I looked there was a good 9mm of additional space in the slotted strut towers to dial in more negative camber in the front.
Old 08-06-2018, 09:13 AM
  #5  
Pep!RRRR
Burning Brakes
 
Pep!RRRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,105
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

The camber adjustment built into these cars is designed to account for minor differences chassis to chassis as they come off the assembly line. (At least that’s what my friend who is a Porsche mechanic told me.). As a result the amount of camber adjustment is fairly small and varies a bit between cars. On my X73 suspension we were able to get about -2.0 front and I think close to -1.4 rear. I still eat up tires, so use tires that can be flipped on the rims for best results. Yes, the adjustable control arms will be going in soon.
Old 12-19-2019, 05:58 PM
  #6  
txbdan
Rennlist Member
 
txbdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: MA
Posts: 550
Received 170 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

Does anyone know if the rear strut towers are slotted? I assume not since the camber is adjustable via the eccentric bolt, but can't hurt to ask i guess. Every bit of neg camber helps!
Old 12-20-2019, 09:07 AM
  #7  
okie981
Rennlist Member
 
okie981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: On a pygmy pony over by the dental floss bush
Posts: 3,285
Received 606 Likes on 415 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by txbdan
Does anyone know if the rear strut towers are slotted? I assume not since the camber is adjustable via the eccentric bolt, but can't hurt to ask i guess. Every bit of neg camber helps!
The rear strut towers on 981 Boxsters and Caymans are not slotted. Not sure about GT4 and Spyder variants of the 981 cars, but all other 981 cars do not have slotted rear tower mounts that might have allowed camber adjustment at the top of the strut.

Here are some data points for a 981 car with X73: To achieve even tire wear during track day use you will need -2.5 front and rear. I could get -2.0 front and rear with stock suspension parts. You will get less negative camber with stock non-X73 suspension, not sure about PASM. I added GT3 LCAs to front and Tarrett adjustable rear toe links to achieve -2.5 front and rear. FWIW, the OEM rear camber specs with X73 are a maximum of -2.0 rear camber, can't recall what front spec limit is.

I get asked frequently if the -2.5 camber is bothersome during street driving to which I reply no, it isn't. If you drive thousands of miles on street wtih -2.5 you will see noticable uneven tire wear, insides wearing more of course.
Old 12-20-2019, 09:27 AM
  #8  
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 15,629
Received 1,371 Likes on 794 Posts
Default

gt3 control arms will get you as much as you'll need short of running slicks. I run 3.25 on a 986 with nitto nt01s and I'm happy with tire wear.
Old 12-20-2019, 12:12 PM
  #9  
txbdan
Rennlist Member
 
txbdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: MA
Posts: 550
Received 170 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

I think i'll shoot for -2.8 to -3.0 up front which i can hopefully get with 10mm shims (GT3 LCAs) and the strut mounts pushed all the way in. I'm afraid if i run more shim than that i'll run into issues with the tie rod ends not being long enough. What do you guys think?

I've heard the toe links are also a limiting factor on rear neg camber. :/

I'm running a time trial series that classes via mod points so i'm trying to avoid all the aftermarket parts i can to avoid taking points for them.


On my old E36 track car i ran -3.5 up front with zero toe. I didn't drive the car much on the streets, but i drive it on 8hr trips to various tracks and it drove fine and the tire wear was fine. Inside tire wear is more due to toe.

Last edited by txbdan; 12-20-2019 at 02:01 PM.
Old 12-20-2019, 01:57 PM
  #10  
okie981
Rennlist Member
 
okie981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: On a pygmy pony over by the dental floss bush
Posts: 3,285
Received 606 Likes on 415 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by txbdan
I think i'll shoot for -2.8 to -3.0 up front which i can hopefully get with 10mm shims and the strut mounts pushed all the way in. I'm afraid if i run more shim than that i'll run into issues with the tie rod ends not being long enough. What do you guys think?

I've heard the toe links are also a limiting factor on rear neg camber. :/

I'm running a time trial series that classes via mod points so i'm trying to avoid all the aftermarket parts i can to avoid taking points for them.


On my old E36 track car i ran -3.5 up front with zero toe. I didn't drive the car much on the streets, but i drive it on 8hr trips to various tracks and it drove fine and the tire wear was fine. Inside tire wear is more due to toe.
If you are asking about adding wheel spacer shims and pushing the top of the front struts all the way in with stock 981 S model LCAs adjusted all the way out for negative camber, I don't think you can get more than -2.1 or -2.2 regardless of what OEM suspension you have.
Old 12-20-2019, 01:59 PM
  #11  
txbdan
Rennlist Member
 
txbdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: MA
Posts: 550
Received 170 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by okie981
If you are asking about adding wheel spacer shims and pushing the top of the front struts all the way in with stock 981 S model LCAs adjusted all the way out for negative camber, I don't think you can get more than -2.1 or -2.2 regardless of what OEM suspension you have.
No i mean GT3 LCA shims. Sorry, forgot to mention that part.
Old 12-20-2019, 06:22 PM
  #12  
PorscheAddict
Rennlist Member
 
PorscheAddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,255
Received 122 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by txbdan
I think i'll shoot for -2.8 to -3.0 up front which i can hopefully get with 10mm shims (GT3 LCAs) and the strut mounts pushed all the way in. I'm afraid if i run more shim than that i'll run into issues with the tie rod ends not being long enough. What do you guys think?

I've heard the toe links are also a limiting factor on rear neg camber. :/

I'm running a time trial series that classes via mod points so i'm trying to avoid all the aftermarket parts i can to avoid taking points for them.


On my old E36 track car i ran -3.5 up front with zero toe. I didn't drive the car much on the streets, but i drive it on 8hr trips to various tracks and it drove fine and the tire wear was fine. Inside tire wear is more due to toe.
I'm definitely running more than 10mm without tie rod issues. My car is at -3.0 front and I still have room in the slots to go more neg (don't want more than that for street/track).
Old 12-20-2019, 06:34 PM
  #13  
txbdan
Rennlist Member
 
txbdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: MA
Posts: 550
Received 170 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorscheAddict
I'm definitely running more than 10mm without tie rod issues. My car is at -3.0 front and I still have room in the slots to go more neg (don't want more than that for street/track).
What suspension/ride height? Do you know how much LCA shim exactly? Thanks for the info!
Old 12-21-2019, 10:25 AM
  #14  
PorscheAddict
Rennlist Member
 
PorscheAddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,255
Received 122 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by txbdan
What suspension/ride height? Do you know how much LCA shim exactly? Thanks for the info!
KW V3, ride height ~2" lower than stock. I don't know exactly how much LCA shim, but I would estimate 15mm. It has the largest shim and then a few tiny shims on each side and I seem to recall large one is 10mm alone.
Old 12-21-2019, 04:38 PM
  #15  
txbdan
Rennlist Member
 
txbdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: MA
Posts: 550
Received 170 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

Wow, yeh so i should be fine regarding tie rod end length then. Thanks!


Quick Reply: Maximum camber on a 981



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:08 AM.