Notices
718 GTS 4.0/GT4/GT4RS/Spyder/25th Anniversary Discussions about the 718 version of the GT4RS, GTS 4.0, GT4, Spyder and 25th Anniversary Boxster
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By: Cobb

982 GT4 Spyder?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2018, 01:44 AM
  #931  
ajw45
Rennlist Member
 
ajw45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NYC <> Boston
Posts: 1,625
Received 322 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suicide Jockey
Do I have this right:

The hp is the same (420) whether it's a 3.8 w/X51 or a detuned 4.0, but a detuned 4.0 is preferable (and it's what many were hoping for in the 982 Spyder/GT4) because a 3.8 w/X51 will deliver more power up top at a higher/limited rev range with smaller gains down low and mid-range, whereas a detuned 4.0 would have provided more accessible power across the entire rev range.

Is that a correct statement? If so, can someone explain for those of us who are mechanically challenged why this would be the case. What is it about adding X51 to the 3.8 that results in the power only coming on at the top end rather than across the entire range? Put another way, why can't the accessibility of the 420 hp achieved by adding the X51 to the 3.8 be replicated down low and mid-range like on a detuned 4.0?

Personally, I find the 981 Spyder has more than enough power "as is" so an additional 45 hp on the 982 would be lost on me, even more so if that hp wasn't noticeable down low and mid-range.
Kinda. There's a lot of assumptions in there but all things being equal, if you give an engine more displacement you'll get more torque across the rev range though realistically with diminishing returns at the top end assuming no changes to intake and exhaust where the limit is less the capacity of the engine and more the capability of it being able to flow that much air at that much rpm. The X51 is kinda the opposite, all intake modifications to breath better higher up in the rev range and no real change in the engine's max torque. Intake is bigger, runners are bigger, intake cams are tweaked (no idea if longer duration or higher lift or both), and the heads are flowed all to allow for more air and extra resonance flaps are really there to try not to LOSE torque down low. Without more displacement and again all things being equal, the intake and exhaust work can't make a bunch more peak torque/L but it can try to change the shape of the curve, a lot, either higher, lower. If you look at the official Porsche dyno below comparing 991.1 S base (dashed) and x51 (solid) you can see that black torque curves both hit the same peak torque number and in some places the x51 has less torque than the base engine but after 6500 RPM the two lines diverge dramatically. That provides a big HP bump but no peak torque increase and really, under 6500rpm zero performance increase. On the other hand, a bump in displacement alone would be like having a second dashed line of similar shape but 5% higher. so you would get a performance increase across the rev range, not just at the top.

Still, we don't really know what Porsche is doing. They could do a 3.8 with a multi-flap intake ala 991.2 GT3 that provides a flatter torque curve down low and up high, who knows. I don't think the 718 GT4/Spyder will get the x51 exactly since even the GT3 didn't get a fancy aluminum intake manifold. I think they'll have a new (plastic) intake manifold specific to the GT4 with a full 911 size tb (finally) and other intake/exhaust revisions to extend and push torque higher in the rev range to get their 420hp w/o actually increasing peak torque much since the 981 is already on the edge of the torque limit of the gearbox which was carried over to the 718. That said, if you already have a 981, might as well call Deman or BGB and go 4L x51 now instead of waiting another year or two. My 4L X51 has been running like a champ since before the 718 Spyder/GT4 speculation threads existed



Old 10-10-2018, 12:30 PM
  #932  
Suicide Jockey
Rennlist Member
 
Suicide Jockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 112 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

^^^^^^ Thanks for your detailed explanation. The issue is clearly more complex than my simplistic understanding, but I have a much better sense of some of the variables at play that Porsche will be working with. Appreciate it.



Old 10-10-2018, 04:17 PM
  #933  
guab
Pro
 
guab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 694
Received 60 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Good explanation. Unless the 718 Spyder offers a dramatic improvement over my 981 with Dundon race headers, I will pass. The ability to spec one for MSRP might sway me, but that would probably be about it. Otherwise, will hold for a few more years and perhaps go the 4.5L route that Dundon keeps talking about should I desire more power. Seeing as I didn't even bother with the tune, I doubt I will -- but 4.5L so who knows.
Old 10-10-2018, 10:34 PM
  #934  
JAM2
Rennlist Member
 
JAM2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: On the edge
Posts: 1,617
Received 425 Likes on 205 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by guab
Good explanation. Unless the 718 Spyder offers a dramatic improvement over my 981 with Dundon race headers, I will pass. The ability to spec one for MSRP might sway me, but that would probably be about it. Otherwise, will hold for a few more years and perhaps go the 4.5L route that Dundon keeps talking about should I desire more power. Seeing as I didn't even bother with the tune, I doubt I will -- but 4.5L so who knows.

agree. Seems like the performance of the 981 w Cobb tune, ipd plenum / gt3 TB, and headers is on par with the new rumored 718 Spyder. 🤔
Old 10-10-2018, 11:00 PM
  #935  
Suicide Jockey
Rennlist Member
 
Suicide Jockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 112 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajw45
I think they'll have a new (plastic) intake manifold specific to the GT4 with a full 911 size tb (finally) . . . .
Originally Posted by JAM2
Seems like the performance of the 981 w Cobb tune, ipd plenum / gt3 TB, and headers is on par with the new rumored 718 Spyder.
TB = throttle body, correct?
Old 10-10-2018, 11:51 PM
  #936  
ajw45
Rennlist Member
 
ajw45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NYC <> Boston
Posts: 1,625
Received 322 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

420hp is huge in Porsche land. That's +35hp! 991.2 GT3 got +25hp, GT3rs got +20hp. 991.2 GTS got +20hp, 991.2S got +30hp. I know 420hp seems like nothing burger these days but it's still a solid gain between generations.
Old 10-10-2018, 11:55 PM
  #937  
JAM2
Rennlist Member
 
JAM2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: On the edge
Posts: 1,617
Received 425 Likes on 205 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suicide Jockey
TB = throttle body, correct?
correct. I was pushing 420+ hp with my modifications. It definitely makes the car come alive and gets rid of all of the flat spots in the rev range. Let’s speculate that the 718 will do the same... still hoping that they surprise us with a 4.0L.
Old 10-11-2018, 12:04 AM
  #938  
Suicide Jockey
Rennlist Member
 
Suicide Jockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 112 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajw45
420hp is huge in Porsche land. That's +35hp!
If the 982 Spyder does have 420 hp, it would actually be +45 hp over the 981 Spyder's 375 hp. This hp increase would be less than the +55 hp jump between the 987 Spyder (320 hp) and the 981 Spyder (375 hp).
Old 10-11-2018, 12:32 AM
  #939  
CAlexio
Race Director
 
CAlexio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hypercar Invitational
Posts: 10,234
Received 1,976 Likes on 919 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JAM2

correct. I was pushing 420+ hp with my modifications. It definitely makes the car come alive and gets rid of all of the flat spots in the rev range. Let’s speculate that the 718 will do the same... still hoping that they surprise us with a 4.0L.
same. my spyder was a pleasure to drive after TB, sport headers and Cobb ECU tune. dramatic difference from the stock engine. i can't imagine that this significant difference wouldn't have happened if the engine hadn't been so neutered from stock. i wonder if the new engine will have such responsiveness for tuning.
Old 10-14-2018, 05:53 PM
  #940  
spyderphile
Three Wheelin'
 
spyderphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Minnetonka, Minnesota
Posts: 1,360
Received 100 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

I never considered a detuned GT3 a viable option. Too expensive. 3.8 + X51 setup has proved to be effective in the past. Budget-friendly to stay within the price curve. All they had to do is to make it compliant to new regs. They may have tested various engine setups, including turbo. But, that could have been for a # of reasons. That's what product development/testing is all about. Those who advocated against it argued that there is no production 3.8. Well, with just-in-time manufacturing and supply chain management, you can pretty much spin up a line in a short period of time. The tooling is already there. The volume is more than enough to make a tidy profit for all the parties involved.

If X51 peaks power near the redline, would be a great news for guys like me. Even among enthusiasts, guys like me are a tiny minority. I don't want low and mid-range torque. Just make it linear and peak near the redline. If I want to pass or enjoy the imminent straight, plan ahead; drop a gear or two and be in the sweet-spot of rev range. And, get ready for the rush and soundtrack! To me, that's an essential aspect of driving! Of course, lower gearing makes all these even more enjoyable. Sadly, Porsche thinks the gearing is fine! So, we got no prayer there.

Those who are expecting a dramatic improvement in performance from 981, are in for a disappointment! That's not how Porsche rolls! Think evolution; not, revolution! Each model cycle sees incremental and evolutionary progress. To me, that's perfectly fine! These days, we may be seeing slightly more than HP jump, if any, between cycles due to HP wars brought on by turbos/hybrids/electrics. Porsche doesn't usually participate in HP wars. They know perfectly well that it's all about the overall package and driving dynamics. For the street, I actually don't want more power than the 981! I value the driving dynamics and styling more than power/torque.
Old 10-15-2018, 09:16 AM
  #941  
WAY
Instructor
 
WAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

While what you are saying is true re incremental improvement from Porsche, the issue is the GTS. From marketing perspective Porsche has no choice but to make the 718 Spyder faster.
Old 10-15-2018, 09:34 AM
  #942  
Selo
Rennlist Member
 
Selo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 124 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WAY
While what you are saying is true re incremental improvement from Porsche, the issue is the GTS. From marketing perspective Porsche has no choice but to make the 718 Spyder faster.
Given the current torque and 0 to 60 specs on the 718 Boxster GTS, Porsche won't have difficulty gerrymandering the 0 to 60 time to where they need it to be. First of all, even if they slap in a power kit 9A1 motor and don't mess with it at all, the torque is higher than the current Boxster GTS. Also, plenty of other tricks they could do, with the pdk transmission, with the width and compound of tires, Etc. But they're doing it all for show, really. I don't think they really care about that number too much.
Old 10-15-2018, 11:03 AM
  #943  
WAY
Instructor
 
WAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The engineers won’t care about that number, but the marketing guys and gals sure would. And in this day and age, marketing trump engineers sadly.
Old 10-15-2018, 11:30 AM
  #944  
digitalrurouni
Pro
 
digitalrurouni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I guess I am in the minority wanting more power. If I get the chance I will definitely upgrade. Especially if I can customize my car to how I want. That opportunity alone is very enticing. Also I like the rear LED lights and the overall silhouette of the car. I don't like the interior vents and the Sport Chrono clock altogether. But I guess it's not enough for me to not want the newer one. And if a car comes from factory without me needing to tweak or feel there was more left on the table - all the better! Another good argument for me to swap is especially if the rumor is true that mechanically both the GT4 and Spyder get the same exact hardware - suspension/wheels/tires. Then it's a no-brainer! But how much of that is true I do not know. Time will tell. Bummed they got rid of the Sapphire Blue color though. That color turned everyone's heads whenever I drive my Spyder!
Old 10-15-2018, 01:01 PM
  #945  
SpyderSenseOC
Rennlist Member
 
SpyderSenseOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 3,287
Received 1,349 Likes on 809 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by digitalrurouni
I guess I am in the minority wanting more power. If I get the chance I will definitely upgrade. Especially if I can customize my car to how I want. That opportunity alone is very enticing. Also I like the rear LED lights and the overall silhouette of the car. I don't like the interior vents and the Sport Chrono clock altogether. But I guess it's not enough for me to not want the newer one. And if a car comes from factory without me needing to tweak or feel there was more left on the table - all the better! Another good argument for me to swap is especially if the rumor is true that mechanically both the GT4 and Spyder get the same exact hardware - suspension/wheels/tires. Then it's a no-brainer! But how much of that is true I do not know. Time will tell. Bummed they got rid of the Sapphire Blue color though. That color turned everyone's heads whenever I drive my Spyder!
I'm thinking Brewster Green with black wheels and cocoa brown full leather interior or Zanzibar Red on black. Mmmm


Quick Reply: 982 GT4 Spyder?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:23 PM.