X73 Suspension package in 981?
#17
Three Wheelin'
Bill Lehman, hf1:
I think all these bode well for the GTS to be worthy of it's moniker. On the surface, it might be construed as a 'luxury' exercise; but, spec’d correctly, it could be the best Boxster yet, superseding the Spyder as king of the hill; until, 981 Spyder turns up. One of the forum members commented that from MY15, there may be an option for bucket seats. So, that would make the driving experience even better.
I actually meant Porsche re-calibrating the steering feel for the GTS. I am betting on it.
Eduardo:
Your breadth of knowledge on Porsches and reach are unrivaled. But, I am going to stick my neck out and make the following predictions:
- The GTS will have X73 option. I don’t see a business or technical case for not offering it.
- 981 gen will get a Spyder; and, it will have NA engine, though the platform would have switched to flat-4 turbo. The top will be manual, as it’s an easy target for weight saving. It may not be two-piece bikini affair; but, some complex manual solution, Porsche-style!
- Did Porsche lose money on 987 Spyders? No indication of that. Models like Spyder and RS aren’t expected to be top-earners; but, as long as they aren’t losing money on each unit sold, they will continue to make such niche models. Porsche knows that these models are important for the brand equity.
cheers.
I think all these bode well for the GTS to be worthy of it's moniker. On the surface, it might be construed as a 'luxury' exercise; but, spec’d correctly, it could be the best Boxster yet, superseding the Spyder as king of the hill; until, 981 Spyder turns up. One of the forum members commented that from MY15, there may be an option for bucket seats. So, that would make the driving experience even better.
I actually meant Porsche re-calibrating the steering feel for the GTS. I am betting on it.
Eduardo:
Your breadth of knowledge on Porsches and reach are unrivaled. But, I am going to stick my neck out and make the following predictions:
- The GTS will have X73 option. I don’t see a business or technical case for not offering it.
- 981 gen will get a Spyder; and, it will have NA engine, though the platform would have switched to flat-4 turbo. The top will be manual, as it’s an easy target for weight saving. It may not be two-piece bikini affair; but, some complex manual solution, Porsche-style!
- Did Porsche lose money on 987 Spyders? No indication of that. Models like Spyder and RS aren’t expected to be top-earners; but, as long as they aren’t losing money on each unit sold, they will continue to make such niche models. Porsche knows that these models are important for the brand equity.
cheers.
#19
Eduardo:
Your breadth of knowledge on Porsches and reach are unrivaled. But, I am going to stick my neck out and make the following predictions:
- The GTS will have X73 option. I don’t see a business or technical case for not offering it.
- 981 gen will get a Spyder; and, it will have NA engine, though the platform would have switched to flat-4 turbo. The top will be manual, as it’s an easy target for weight saving. It may not be two-piece bikini affair; but, some complex manual solution, Porsche-style!
- Did Porsche lose money on 987 Spyders? No indication of that. Models like Spyder and RS aren’t expected to be top-earners; but, as long as they aren’t losing money on each unit sold, they will continue to make such niche models. Porsche knows that these models are important for the brand equity.
Your breadth of knowledge on Porsches and reach are unrivaled. But, I am going to stick my neck out and make the following predictions:
- The GTS will have X73 option. I don’t see a business or technical case for not offering it.
- 981 gen will get a Spyder; and, it will have NA engine, though the platform would have switched to flat-4 turbo. The top will be manual, as it’s an easy target for weight saving. It may not be two-piece bikini affair; but, some complex manual solution, Porsche-style!
- Did Porsche lose money on 987 Spyders? No indication of that. Models like Spyder and RS aren’t expected to be top-earners; but, as long as they aren’t losing money on each unit sold, they will continue to make such niche models. Porsche knows that these models are important for the brand equity.
#20
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Since they are only offering it at the very end of the production run the quantities built are inherintly limited.
So the interesting question for the future will be what engine will the next GT4 and Spyder have.....
#21
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
When Porsche announced the first Spyder they specifically stated that it would be a regular model going forward and it would not be limited production either which has somewhat held true.
Since they are only offering it at the very end of the production run the quantities built are inherintly limited.
So the interesting question for the future will be what engine will the next GT4 and Spyder have.....
Since they are only offering it at the very end of the production run the quantities built are inherintly limited.
So the interesting question for the future will be what engine will the next GT4 and Spyder have.....
#22
Burning Brakes
Who knows...
#23
Race Car
PASM is terrific and versatile, IMO. As for the roads - imagine southeastern MA, now imagine a 7.0 earthquake. Now you have Philly roads.
#24
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
My sales guy (leading independent) says he thinks the next GT4 will get the 991.1 GTS engine and not be called a 718. He also thinks there won't be a 718 Spyder because an NA engine at the top of the range would represent a marketing contortion even Porsche couldn't pull for a non-GT car.
Who knows...
Who knows...
#25
Rennlist Member
If the GT4 gets the 991.1 GTS engine it will be interesting to hear how they manage to get the intake to work on the next gen.
#26
Three Wheelin'
Thanks, elp_jc.
Afshin, Zeus993, MagicRat, Alan C.:
Here are my predictions:
- There "will be" a 718 Spyder. As Afshin pointed out, it is a regular production, end-of-cycle model. With two generations in the history books, it has cemented it's legacy as one of the most exciting, road-going, open-top Porsches. The future of Spyder, at least in the near term, is secure and will continue to excite.
- The engine will be current NA for at least one more cycle. It might have X51 Power Kit with some additional tuning. I am not sure if there is enough space in the bay to accommodate all the plumbing and cooling. But, NA is a done deal.
- GT4 will be part of 718 family. No rational reason not to be.
- A while back, they trademarked the moniker 'GT5'. Wonder if the Spyder will get that.
- 987 Spyder a failure?? Hardly! I believe last time Porsche ever lost money on a model was Carrera GT! If it made money, defined driver-focused benchmark and got driving enthusiasts excited, then it would be deemed a clear win. 981 successor proved that point.
- Oh, and, the next Spyder will be a GT car! You can thank me later!
981 platform's road map has been clearly defined and signed off way back. High level Product Planning happens years in advance, factoring-in worldwide regulations and market/financial conditions. They get tweaked and adjusted to accommodate changing variables. Post-981 variables get interesting though. We are talking hybrids and electrics. Euro regs kicking in 2020 are much more onerous. Even boutique manufacturers like Caterham aren't gonna be exempt. They seem to be working on making the chassis even lighter and turbo charging the engines! My guess is that GT/Spyder cars would continue to stay a step closer to enthusiasts-side on engine choices.
Afshin, Zeus993, MagicRat, Alan C.:
Here are my predictions:
- There "will be" a 718 Spyder. As Afshin pointed out, it is a regular production, end-of-cycle model. With two generations in the history books, it has cemented it's legacy as one of the most exciting, road-going, open-top Porsches. The future of Spyder, at least in the near term, is secure and will continue to excite.
- The engine will be current NA for at least one more cycle. It might have X51 Power Kit with some additional tuning. I am not sure if there is enough space in the bay to accommodate all the plumbing and cooling. But, NA is a done deal.
- GT4 will be part of 718 family. No rational reason not to be.
- A while back, they trademarked the moniker 'GT5'. Wonder if the Spyder will get that.
- 987 Spyder a failure?? Hardly! I believe last time Porsche ever lost money on a model was Carrera GT! If it made money, defined driver-focused benchmark and got driving enthusiasts excited, then it would be deemed a clear win. 981 successor proved that point.
- Oh, and, the next Spyder will be a GT car! You can thank me later!
981 platform's road map has been clearly defined and signed off way back. High level Product Planning happens years in advance, factoring-in worldwide regulations and market/financial conditions. They get tweaked and adjusted to accommodate changing variables. Post-981 variables get interesting though. We are talking hybrids and electrics. Euro regs kicking in 2020 are much more onerous. Even boutique manufacturers like Caterham aren't gonna be exempt. They seem to be working on making the chassis even lighter and turbo charging the engines! My guess is that GT/Spyder cars would continue to stay a step closer to enthusiasts-side on engine choices.
#27
I had a '15 981 CS with the x73 and the PTV. Even on Miami so-so roads, it was compliant and the car was never low enough to cause routine scraping of the front or rear while getting out of parking lot dips. the suspension felt in keeping with a dual purpose car on both highways and tighter city roads. While the GT4 that replaced it is stiffer and lower, it makes daily driving a little less livable than the CS.
Jpr
Jpr
#28
Racer
I have the X71 setup in my GTS and the ride quality really depends on the quality of your local pavement. Do you live in the smoother paved suburbs or more warzone like urban pavement. I unfortunately live in downtown LA which has some terrible, gnarly roads so leaving the area is a bit awful and many stretches of the LA freeways in my immediate area are also equally unpleasant, but plenty of great driving roads once I reach them.
#29
Maybe there will be a GT4 Spyder with an NA engine. I'd expect the 981.2 GT4 and GT4 Spyder would get a detuned 991.2 GT3 engine with 9000 rpm redline...
If Porsche is looking for repeat customers, that's what it would take to get me to trade in
If Porsche is looking for repeat customers, that's what it would take to get me to trade in
#30
The next Spyder will almost certainly be a turbo 4 to show continuity with the 718 platform and hopefully generate some excitement around the 718 line.
To make both the next GT4 and Spyder NA 6 would completely undermine Porsche's marketing efforts to legitimize the turbo 4 as an engine worthy of a Porsche sports car.
The GT4 being a GT car gives Porsche the latitude to keep the NA 6. Additionally, the GT4 was far more successful sales wise than the 981 Spyder so there is that additional business case to continue the GT4 with the NA 6.
So from Porsche's perspective, why would they subvert their 718 marketing efforts and further diminish the value of the turbo 4 to sell a very limited number of 718 Spyders with a flat 6.
No, the Spyder would be far better utilized by Porsche as a showcase to show the potential of the turbo 4 engine and to use that retro speed hump styling to further tie the new 718 line to the illustrious original 718.
It would also counterbalance a flat 6 718 GT4 with a hot setup 718 that uses the turbo 4.
Porsche doesn't strike me as a stupid company so for those reasons I can't see them offering a 718 Spyder with anything other than a turbo 4.
To the poster that mentions Porsche's change of heart with regard to putting an MT in the next GT3, it is clear they did this because of the tremendous outcry for such a car. I also suspect that many of the folks in the Motorsports division were in favor of such a move. Not to mention the fact that utilizing the MT transmission in the 911R just makes business sense as does offering a MT 991.2 GT3 to many loyal Porsche enthusiast who felt cheated out of the 911R.
Adding an MT to the next GT3 makes perfect business sense. Putting a flat 6 in the next Spyder absolutely does not.
To make both the next GT4 and Spyder NA 6 would completely undermine Porsche's marketing efforts to legitimize the turbo 4 as an engine worthy of a Porsche sports car.
The GT4 being a GT car gives Porsche the latitude to keep the NA 6. Additionally, the GT4 was far more successful sales wise than the 981 Spyder so there is that additional business case to continue the GT4 with the NA 6.
So from Porsche's perspective, why would they subvert their 718 marketing efforts and further diminish the value of the turbo 4 to sell a very limited number of 718 Spyders with a flat 6.
No, the Spyder would be far better utilized by Porsche as a showcase to show the potential of the turbo 4 engine and to use that retro speed hump styling to further tie the new 718 line to the illustrious original 718.
It would also counterbalance a flat 6 718 GT4 with a hot setup 718 that uses the turbo 4.
Porsche doesn't strike me as a stupid company so for those reasons I can't see them offering a 718 Spyder with anything other than a turbo 4.
To the poster that mentions Porsche's change of heart with regard to putting an MT in the next GT3, it is clear they did this because of the tremendous outcry for such a car. I also suspect that many of the folks in the Motorsports division were in favor of such a move. Not to mention the fact that utilizing the MT transmission in the 911R just makes business sense as does offering a MT 991.2 GT3 to many loyal Porsche enthusiast who felt cheated out of the 911R.
Adding an MT to the next GT3 makes perfect business sense. Putting a flat 6 in the next Spyder absolutely does not.