Notices
968 Forum 1992-1995

Best Porsche Ever Made: 968 Turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-27-2006 | 08:39 PM
  #16  
SpeedBump's Avatar
SpeedBump
Happily Amused
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,157
Likes: 1
From: MoCo, Md
Default

Originally Posted by richard glickel.
To me, the 968 cab (with top up) is just a beautiful car.

Ciao.


That's why there are 2 in my garage.
Old 11-27-2006 | 11:25 PM
  #17  
H2's Avatar
H2
Thread Starter
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,988
Likes: 35
From: Northwest
Default

These cars are safe from most anything....except some other driver running into you...and it doesn't take a lot to total these cars (in costs to repair vs buying another car). That's why two in a garage is a great idea. A backup....and worst case, you have spare parts.

Harvey
Old 11-28-2006 | 10:39 AM
  #18  
Lemming's Avatar
Lemming
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,426
Likes: 87
From: Altered States of America (B'ham)
Default

Originally Posted by richard glickel.
Hi Raj,

With the airbox mod and Pete's header and an exhaust, I got 209 rwhp on a Mustang dyno. Also had a 210 on a dynopak. No chip, nothing touched internally (not allowed for PCA club racing F stock). Intake and exhaust are "free", so the airbox and header/exhaust are okay to modify.

Ciao.
220 with Pete's Stage II chip, header, and no cat (Dynojet). Still contemplating cams. However, if Wes has a turbo in the works, I might just wait to see how that turns out.
Old 11-28-2006 | 11:49 AM
  #19  
whakiewes's Avatar
whakiewes
Pro
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 500
Likes: 1
From: NC
Default

One small thing I have noticed is that everyone about 200whp doesn't have a cat any longer. When I removed mine (no headers), it made a large difference. My racerX chip also had a little be desired and I have tried to work out most of the bugs.

Wes
Old 11-28-2006 | 12:15 PM
  #20  
flash968's Avatar
flash968
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Default

having now played with 4 different aftermarket cats on this car, it is amazing how much of a difference the size and restriction of each unit has made - much happier now with the bigger cat - the small ones just lost too much torque - sure, there was a tiny little bit of a quicker revving response thing going on way up top, but down low it was just no fun with the smaller ones
Old 11-28-2006 | 01:54 PM
  #21  
whakiewes's Avatar
whakiewes
Pro
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 500
Likes: 1
From: NC
Default

What do you mean by larger and smaller? More and less cell? I am decatted with a 2.5" 'test' pipe as some call it. Loud, but made the car sound much meaner to me.

Wes
Old 11-28-2006 | 03:49 PM
  #22  
flash968's Avatar
flash968
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Default

all of the above - more and less cells (100, 200, and 300) - different size biscuits - one biscuit - 2 biscuits - i've been playing around with different units trying to sort out what works best - so far, all of the small single biscuit units were not as good as the larger dual unit i have in there now

yes, sound changed, and i thought i was having more fun with the small units, but the torque loss bugged me - i had to do a number of runs to figure it out - "seemed" livelier, but in reality the car was slower - if i spent all day at 6k and up, it might have been good, but my car is really mostly on the street




All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:49 PM.