25 year present for my turbo
#31
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I picked up the car and the new suspension feels great. Just stiff enough to know you are driving a 911. I suspect it will handle nicely in the twisties. The car ended up lower than I wanted so I am going back to raise the car once the blizzard subsides. I do like the even spacing from the rim to the fenders so I plan to raise front and rear about 3/4 of an inch.
On another note, does anyone run wheel spacers? I was considering some 5 to 7 mm spacers front and rear to fill the wheel arches a little better.
On another note, does anyone run wheel spacers? I was considering some 5 to 7 mm spacers front and rear to fill the wheel arches a little better.
#32
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I picked up the car and the new suspension feels great. Just stiff enough to know you are driving a 911. I suspect it will handle nicely in the twisties. The car ended up lower than I wanted so I am going back to raise the car once the blizzard subsides. I do like the even spacing from the rim to the fenders so I plan to raise front and rear about 3/4 of an inch.
On another note, does anyone run wheel spacers? I was considering some 5 to 7 mm spacers front and rear to fill the wheel arches a little better.
On another note, does anyone run wheel spacers? I was considering some 5 to 7 mm spacers front and rear to fill the wheel arches a little better.
#33
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Looks good. I would consider 10mm increase max. Any higher you will defeat what you just did. You can run spacers. You do need to use hub centering spacers. The hubs have a 7mm lip. You can run 3mm safely. I would consider 3 in front and 7 in the rear. IIRC the early turbos use a hub similar to the stock C2 which is a round ring vs the rear or 993 fronts which have 3 tabs. The three tab version can be purchased and give you a proper hub to center the tire on.
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
When I had 225's up front I ran a 13mm spacer with no issues.
I think Speedlines are more inset at the rear; at least it looks that way in pictures.
#35
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On my RH wheels I run 6's in the front to keep the 235 tires from rubbing the inner wheelhouse. I could stand to run 3 mm spacers out back so I guess I'm reversing your advice, Anthony ![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
When I had 225's up front I ran a 13mm spacer with no issues.
I think Speedlines are more inset at the rear; at least it looks that way in pictures.
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
When I had 225's up front I ran a 13mm spacer with no issues.
I think Speedlines are more inset at the rear; at least it looks that way in pictures.
I was always curious if Porsche used these speedlines with narrow arms would the turbo have sold more or less?
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
These are factory RSR wheels 9.5 w/245's and 11's w/325's
#36
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I run 4 or 5mm spacer in back - 285/35 tire on genuine Speedlines (which I think have different ET than RH). 225 up front no spacer. Part of me wants to run a few mm's up front, too....
#37
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Still thinking about converting to the skinny NA arms but there must be a reason Porsche put biffier arms on the turbos. Any view on that ?
To mmporsche I would NOT raise that car ! Looks just fine to me.
#38
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just German's over complicating things. The narrow arms react much faster and offer the same high speed stability but far more nimble at the same time.
#39
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Some of the literature (non of it official) referenced having an un-favorable scrub angle when using the narrow arms, if my memory serves me correctly. The Turbo arms were to prevent that and the accompanying high rear tire wear. So it was a customer satisfaction thing.
#40
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Some of the literature (non of it official) referenced having an un-favorable scrub angle when using the narrow arms, if my memory serves me correctly. The Turbo arms were to prevent that and the accompanying high rear tire wear. So it was a customer satisfaction thing.
![crying](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/bigcry.gif)
All my prior 911's I was lucky to get 8k miles out of a set of rear tires. I have never used a set up on the 94 they just aged out but the last set had 8k miles and there was 70% of the tread left. Sounds like they achieved their goal.
Still learning every day.
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#41
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Out in the rear I run the wider inner hoops I get from Jim Dorociak (total width 10 3/4 inches inner bear to inner bead). Those could be pushed out 3 mm also and I plan to do just that this season.
#42
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
wheels are 8.5 up front and 10.5 rear width modified by Jim D
![](http://i62.tinypic.com/25ho1p3.png)
#43
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That is the first I heard that but it makes sense. Although from a performance perspective the narrow arms are a better choice. Comparing the three setups I like narrow arms on widebody then the C2 for low speed maneuvering since I don't hit the higher speeds then the turbo for its high speed & sweeping turn stability. The 1st is a good combo of both and I don't expect to get more than a few hundred miles out of the tires. ![crying](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/bigcry.gif)
All my prior 911's I was lucky to get 8k miles out of a set of rear tires. I have never used a set up on the 94 they just aged out but the last set had 8k miles and there was 70% of the tread left. Sounds like they achieved their goal.
Still learning every day.![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![crying](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/bigcry.gif)
All my prior 911's I was lucky to get 8k miles out of a set of rear tires. I have never used a set up on the 94 they just aged out but the last set had 8k miles and there was 70% of the tread left. Sounds like they achieved their goal.
Still learning every day.
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#44
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I put H&R coil overs and HD Bilsriens and have a small positive rake in the front. Added 18" sport design wheels. I upgraded to a Tial waste gate and 1 bar spring. Added a Laesek WUR which is a PITA to adjust......have a K27 HF turbo and honestly she is at the limit of the CIS.....better option is to go full motronic but you talking $10k.....short shift kit is another nice adder.
#45
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I put H&R coil overs and HD Bilsriens and have a small positive rake in the front. Added 18" sport design wheels. I upgraded to a Tial waste gate and 1 bar spring. Added a Laesek WUR which is a PITA to adjust......have a K27 HF turbo and honestly she is at the limit of the CIS.....better option is to go full motronic but you talking $10k.....short shift kit is another nice adder.
But after year of track days and some mild racing with this setting my leak down and comp tests were perfect.