Notices
964 Turbo Forum 1989-1994

965 heat exchanger solution?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-2009, 11:12 AM
  #31  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,172
Received 1,932 Likes on 1,169 Posts
Default

I am confused is this a Ninemeister system or a B&B. Mine is a B&B and look nearly identical.
Attached Images   
Old 02-24-2009, 11:59 AM
  #32  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,443
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

The one in the photo is a B&B with a modified, large diameter wastegate pipe fitted to cure boost creep problems; posted photo to show symetrical merge under the turbo for the help of MB911 who has crafted himself nice set of pipes but with an asymetrical junction.
Old 02-24-2009, 12:14 PM
  #33  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,172
Received 1,932 Likes on 1,169 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NineMeister
The one in the photo is a B&B with a modified, large diameter wastegate pipe fitted to cure boost creep problems; posted photo to show symetrical merge under the turbo for the help of MB911 who has crafted himself nice set of pipes but with an asymetrical junction.
I thought it looked like a B&B product. Although I run 1 bar with almost no boost creep.
Old 03-07-2009, 04:40 PM
  #34  
jayster
Instructor
 
jayster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: DELRAY BEACH, woohoo
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like my idea better! It is simple and works. My secondaries are divided to the turbo housing, kinda like a turbo diesel.
I did something similar on my F350, and was able to manage boost with the "pulse effect", so it does work.
As far as my waste gate it is fed evenly by both banks, with much less change in direction of flow, than the pic in your post.
The really big plus though for me, is it is entirely of AMERICAN manufacture.....
Old 03-07-2009, 06:34 PM
  #35  
mb911
Pro
Thread Starter
 
mb911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Burlington Wi
Posts: 536
Received 76 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

The reason Again for my design was to work with complelty stock components . Idealy every thing would have been custom and we could have an absolute even run and diveded. you sure could divide this set up though you would creat a bottle neck for lack of volume at the t3 flange as I run 2" primaries from the flange
Old 03-09-2009, 04:14 PM
  #36  
nathanUK '81 930 G50
Race Car
 
nathanUK '81 930 G50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: England UK
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ben, can you tell me why you didn't make the merge symetrical at the T3 flange?
Old 03-11-2009, 11:18 PM
  #37  
Turbohead
Rennlist Member
 
Turbohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palm Beaches Fl /Southern VT
Posts: 1,736
Received 49 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NineMeister
The one in the photo is a B&B with a modified, large diameter wastegate pipe fitted to cure boost creep problems; posted photo to show symetrical merge under the turbo for the help of MB911 who has crafted himself nice set of pipes but with an asymetrical junction.

+1

Mine is making @ .9 bar (on a Mustang)
427 R whp
486 TQ !!!
EFI with small quick spool custom ITS Turbo T4
Tile WG
GHL headers with larger WG pipe
No Creep
Elliot
Attached Images   



Quick Reply: 965 heat exchanger solution?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:39 AM.