Notices
964 Turbo Forum 1989-1994

My new 3.6 Turbo upgrade / engine mod path

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2007, 01:39 PM
  #16  
eyue
Racer
 
eyue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I would like to know the difference between our stock turbo and the HFS. Can you really feel the difference ?
Old 05-30-2007, 02:26 PM
  #17  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,375
Received 2,051 Likes on 1,231 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eyue
I would like to know the difference between our stock turbo and the HFS. Can you really feel the difference ?
I have the HF I don't know the difference between the HF and HFS but I can say the HF makes a world of difference. The HF turbo is more responsive than the stock K27. The first thing you notice is the ability to control the throttle more like a N/A car. The on/off feeling you get with the stock K27 is gone. When powering through a turn you can apply the throttle with much more confidence than before and it does not run out of wind above 5000 rpms the way the stock K27 does.
Old 05-30-2007, 02:45 PM
  #18  
eyue
Racer
 
eyue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That sound great Anthony, next on my list would be the HFS . Thanks !
Old 05-30-2007, 02:49 PM
  #19  
sl951
Pro
Thread Starter
 
sl951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

"The rest of the mods are more like putting lipstick on a pig (the pig being CIS)."..

hahaha.. CIS, yeah that's unfortunate.

The ball-bearing turbo should only affect spool up time and not increase airflow mass. 1 bar of boost is 1 bar of boost, regardless of turbo.
Now, how fast & efficient you get to 1 bar of boost is dependent on exhaust system, turbo spool, and intake efficiencies.

Seems like with these CIS engines delivering enough metered fuel is the core issue.

My car doesn't have a CAT. A wideband O2 sensor is going on. I might even get to use that independent knock sensor system I have... everything tuck away in the glove box or something.. I don't like the bling gauges everywhere.


Since our cars have a mechicanal fuel injection system.. what does the existing stock O2 sensor control?
Old 05-30-2007, 10:34 PM
  #20  
dholling13
Burning Brakes
 
dholling13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It seems the path you are taking would be towards unplugging that sensor. If you search the forum you'll find out more than all you need and want to know.
Old 05-31-2007, 12:25 AM
  #21  
Y65MPH
Pro
 
Y65MPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sl951
"The ball-bearing turbo should only affect spool up time and not increase airflow mass. 1 bar of boost is 1 bar of boost, regardless of turbo.

The volume of air my GT35R puts out at 1 bar is many times more than my K27HFS did at 1 bar. So 1 bar is reletive to pressure not volume of air.
Old 05-31-2007, 11:37 AM
  #22  
JBH
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
JBH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 3,259
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The volume of air my GT35R puts out at 1 bar is many times more than my K27HFS did at 1 bar. So 1 bar is relative to pressure not volume of air.
Correct...this is not a static system governed by:
PV=nRT

In the case of flow, the equation becomes:
V/t = [(n/t)*(RT)]/P

where V/t is the volume of air per unit time (flowrate) and n/t is the mass (moles) of oxygen moving through the system per unit time. At constant pressure (1 bar) a higher flowrate (V/t) delivers more oxygen per unit time (n/t) to the engine.
Old 05-31-2007, 05:52 PM
  #23  
sl951
Pro
Thread Starter
 
sl951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

You guys are correct, from a mass flow perspective on turbo efficiencies.

I was commenting on the same turbo compressor efficiency with a ball-bearing instead of bushing.. (think K-27 with BB).
Old 06-01-2007, 12:06 AM
  #24  
Turbohead
Rennlist Member
 
Turbohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palm Beaches Fl /Southern VT
Posts: 1,737
Received 49 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Some Questions ......any body?
When using a GT35 R how do you cool it ? do you run oil through the water bearing jacket?
Also what size oil restrictor is used to prevent seal blowout from too much Oil?
Old 06-01-2007, 12:20 AM
  #25  
dholling13
Burning Brakes
 
dholling13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Where's Kevin when you need him ????
Old 06-01-2007, 04:09 AM
  #26  
sl951
Pro
Thread Starter
 
sl951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Turbohead
Some Questions ......any body?
When using a GT35 R how do you cool it ? do you run oil through the water bearing jacket?
Also what size oil restrictor is used to prevent seal blowout from too much Oil?
There is a thread over on Pelican about a 3.8 liter build running oil through the water bearing jacket.. I don't have experience with this one.

Atleast on the 944 Turbo side.. we run anywhere from 40-70 thou hole oil restrictors. Basically an allen key plug with hole drilled through it, seems to work well.
Old 09-22-2018, 02:35 PM
  #27  
There's no Sub!
Advanced
 
There's no Sub!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Springfield mo
Posts: 68
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is the gt35r the best option if throttle response and low and mid range power is more important than max hp.?
Yes of course flow will help everything but if you had a choice of any what is best?
Old 10-18-2018, 08:53 AM
  #28  
myfisch
Advanced
 
myfisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cobalt
This is a strange subject. The PET says we have 964 N/A cams some engine builders disagree. Nobody has been able to verify or confirm other than their word. I know of 3 reputable shops that I trust that insist the lift and duration is different and 3 others, also reputable that claim their the same.

Someone needs to measure and compare.

Wish I could help more but Elliot has been through this recently.

I was told there is an EVO came that is supposed to be very nice but have no info either, although I believe that is used with EFI conversions.
Quite easy: 964 NA is the same cam like 964 3.6 Turbo S (X50) cars. The M64.50 Standard engine is equiped with 96410524820 (right for example)

In PET you wont find the S Spec, but you can check Flachbau.com

I build some of These 3,3 and 3,6 engines and go for the cams with a 7006 Turbo like the S cars.

Regards



Quick Reply: My new 3.6 Turbo upgrade / engine mod path



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:53 PM.