Notices
964 Turbo Forum 1989-1994

3x Bypass = HP?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2006, 07:39 PM
  #1  
Burman
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Burman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SWEDEN
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 3x Bypass = HP?

Hi guys!!

I now have 3x bypass and a 0.9bar spring on my 964 turbo (Wastegate,G-pipe and the cat.What can thet make in HP? + 75kg lighter
Old 11-20-2006, 08:07 PM
  #2  
911addict
Three Wheelin'
 
911addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey Burman,
The triple....Well done!
How do you like the sounds?

I'd say 15+ for the cat, 5 for the G, and don't know about the wastegate but what a beautiful scream!!
The spring another 20....
Old 11-20-2006, 08:11 PM
  #3  
Burman
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Burman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SWEDEN
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow that sounds great!!

Im still waiting for the cat bypass pipe so i havent heard it yet..BUT I WANT!!!
Ohh so the spring is only 20hp more..was hoping more then that, but it gone feel i hope..
Old 11-20-2006, 10:46 PM
  #4  
tasracer
Burning Brakes
 
tasracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: cleveland,oh
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

headers cat and muffler bypass + 1 bar.... i dynoed at 376hp at the rear wheels
Old 11-21-2006, 04:03 AM
  #5  
911addict
Three Wheelin'
 
911addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

376 at wheels is around 450 at crank/ flywheel. Oh my God!

To compare Burman's (3.3?) you'd minus the headers (40bhp?) and 3.6 v 3.3 (40bhp) to give around 370 which would sound about right.
Old 11-21-2006, 05:45 AM
  #6  
JamesE
Addict
Rennlist Member

RIP
 
JamesE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: London
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A 3.3 + 1bar -cat + G pipe, would be ~365 flywheel HP. Headers make a lot more torque but that doesn't always translate to HP. When I added headers to the above I ended up with 375hp at the fly wheel. I saw the G pipe being only worth 5bhp with back to back testing. Although throttle responce was noticably better with out the final muffler. After that you could add cams but you are already close to what std CIS can handle.
Old 11-21-2006, 09:27 AM
  #7  
Burman
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Burman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SWEDEN
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks guys!!
Ihope its not gone overboost with the 0.9 spring and all bypasses..
Look forward to feel the new hp on my car!!
Old 11-21-2006, 05:34 PM
  #8  
911addict
Three Wheelin'
 
911addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Burman, that's the setup I have and its perfect ;-)
Old 11-21-2006, 08:38 PM
  #9  
pzull
Burning Brakes
 
pzull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 2 ends of the Pacific
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tasracer
headers cat and muffler bypass + 1 bar.... i dynoed at 376hp at the rear wheels
COuld you post the dynochart? I'm interested to see the torque curve.
Old 11-22-2006, 12:07 PM
  #10  
tasracer
Burning Brakes
 
tasracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: cleveland,oh
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

torque was crazy like 450... dont know where it is.... ill call the shop... they should have a copy
Old 11-22-2006, 02:45 PM
  #11  
tasracer
Burning Brakes
 
tasracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: cleveland,oh
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

it was a cool day.. 55 deg... so i figure 420 at the crank....fast ****er
Old 11-22-2006, 06:37 PM
  #12  
Burman
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Burman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SWEDEN
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

911addict : Do you think the performance of your car is much better now then when it was stock?
Is it like MUCH better?
Old 11-22-2006, 06:43 PM
  #13  
911addict
Three Wheelin'
 
911addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"911addict : Do you think the performance of your car is much better now then when it was stock?
Is it like MUCH better?"

Yes. The cat bypass made all the difference. Much more low end torque and smoother, better response all the way. The 2nd bypass (g-pipe) doesn't make any difference in the power in my opinion, but it sounds MUCH meaner, and now I am happy, whereas before I always thought the 965 sounded lame compared to my old 3.2 Carrera.

PS: Unfortunately, I didn't get my car on the dyno today. The engineer said although they do normally aspirated 911's, they couldn't keep an aircooled turbo car cool enough...
Old 11-22-2006, 07:19 PM
  #14  
Burman
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Burman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SWEDEN
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ohh soo sad.. It would have been soo nice to see the output of it!!
Did you do anything with the fuel when you change to the 0.9 spring?
Old 12-04-2006, 09:07 PM
  #15  
911addict
Three Wheelin'
 
911addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry Burman, missed your last post.
No I didn't do anything to the fuel mix. My understanding is the car can adjust itself to the exhaust mods. Its been checked since on a diagnostics computer. It runs perfectly.

Do you have your cat bypass yet?


Quick Reply: 3x Bypass = HP?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:35 AM.