reduce lag?
#16
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I found that the headers made the best improvement. The HF made a small change in lag but wasn't trully noticeable until I add the 1.0 bar spring. Although full boost is not achieved until 3200 rpm the addition of the 1.0 bar spring and proper tuning start the boost to build stronger & earlier making the car more comfortable.
Charlie, aren't you still using the stock exhaust minus the cats?
Charlie, aren't you still using the stock exhaust minus the cats?
#18
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Guys, how do you meassure at what RPM you get full boost ?
I was under the assumption that I had full boost at 3.300 - 3.400 until I installed a logging unit.
It turned out to be more like 3.700 - 3.800, see the chart here (in Swedish):
http://rejsa.nu/forum/viewtopic.php?...=asc&start=419
I got the data by just "driving around" (full throttle on different gears).
I run ROW headers, not cat and a stock turbo at 0.9 bar.
I am interested in a HF turbo but I am not convinced it will give me better laptimes.
Very interested to see if there are any solid real life data before/after on the difference between stock and HF turbo.
I was under the assumption that I had full boost at 3.300 - 3.400 until I installed a logging unit.
It turned out to be more like 3.700 - 3.800, see the chart here (in Swedish):
http://rejsa.nu/forum/viewtopic.php?...=asc&start=419
I got the data by just "driving around" (full throttle on different gears).
I run ROW headers, not cat and a stock turbo at 0.9 bar.
I am interested in a HF turbo but I am not convinced it will give me better laptimes.
Very interested to see if there are any solid real life data before/after on the difference between stock and HF turbo.