Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Engine longevity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-2015, 11:42 AM
  #1  
placer
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
placer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 152
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default Engine longevity

I am looking at 964s, and I have noticed by reading through various threads here that many of these engines have been rebuilt/replaced at around 100k miles. Is this normal? My '89 Carrera had 170k on the original motor with no issues. Thanks.
Old 09-16-2015, 11:47 AM
  #2  
HalV
Rennlist Member
 
HalV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 772
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

My '93 has 154k and still shows much less than 5% leakdown on all cylinders. I think many of these engines get rebuilt before needed due to oil leaks.
Old 09-16-2015, 11:50 AM
  #3  
tdiquattro
Racer
 
tdiquattro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Bucks, UK
Posts: 290
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

200k miles, no smoke, no issues, solid power, I agree for many it is the oil leaks.
Old 09-16-2015, 11:52 AM
  #4  
Earlydays
Three Wheelin'
 
Earlydays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: McKinney, Texas
Posts: 1,400
Received 39 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

It is typically "oil leak panic" that drives rebuilds. The engines are very strong and have great longevity!
Old 09-16-2015, 12:21 PM
  #5  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,205
Received 565 Likes on 202 Posts
Default

My 964's engine was rebuilt at 164K miles. My 993 has 113K miles and is strong!
Old 09-16-2015, 12:33 PM
  #6  
Goughary
Race Car
 
Goughary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: fairfield, CT
Posts: 4,865
Likes: 0
Received 431 Likes on 279 Posts
Default Engine longevity

Most haven't been rebuilt. Many on the forum, have had top end rebuilds, and some have had full rebuild down to the crank.

Most didn't need it. Some needed it, and some wouldn't run without it.

You've got a few things at play. Your average 911 owner isn't on rennlist. That's first. So you don't hear from the happy guy at home who just smirks when he sees the inevitable oil on the garage floor and drives away...he's not a forum guy, and most aren't.

Forum people tend to be two types. Fixers and modders. Both are way more likely to open the motor to fix something that doesn't really "need" to be fixed. Fixers will fix something that's broken or go after marginable hp gains. Modders will fix things that aren't broken, make things look cooler, and go after massive hp gains where they rarely get much at all, but have gone down a slippery slope getting there...if you hang with either group, you will begin to believe that much work is to be done, when really, in most cases, it would have been ok to let it go and drive the car...

I'll give an example. I bought my car w 58k on it. Engine tray was on. Traffic, and subsequent burnt valves, crap caked all over everything. Oil dripping from everywhere it could find a place to drip from. Car ran fine. Cold, it had zero compression. But there was a strange noise. A tick I didn't like. Felt slow. Wasn't perfect.
I spent 20k doing a top end rebuild. Slippery slope, replaced everything. Car since, runs fine. Feels slow (because it is), and no longer drips. Did I need the rebuild? Thought I did. Maybe I did. Glad I did. But it ran. And it isn't faster.
Cold, zero compression. Hot, had compression, just not perfect. I likely gained a few hp doing the top end build, but on the street, not being timed, you just aren't going to notice (in real terms).

Well maintained, these cars will literally go forever. Lack of maintenance, and they will need maintenance. No big deal.

If I were looking to buy one, however, since so many of us have rebuilt the motors, I'd be looking for a car with a good rebuild. More because most of the people driving up the prices don't really understand what they are looking at, and will pay a huge premium for lower miles, and a higher miles car with better maintenance will go cheaper and would usually be a better car, because it's owners made it that way.
Old 09-16-2015, 01:15 PM
  #7  
Earlydays
Three Wheelin'
 
Earlydays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: McKinney, Texas
Posts: 1,400
Received 39 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

....also the 964/993 uses the "Metzger" engine and it is used as the base for the 996/997 Turbo's and GT3's, including the racing versions of the GT3. It is one stout motor!
Old 09-16-2015, 02:22 PM
  #8  
Tmistry
Rennlist Member
 
Tmistry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,088
Received 127 Likes on 62 Posts
Default Engine longevity

Originally Posted by Earlydays
....also the 964/993 uses the "Metzger" engine and it is used as the base for the 996/997 Turbo's and GT3's, including the racing versions of the GT3. It is one stout motor!
I had no idea the 964/993 was considered a metzger engine. Where can I get more info on this? Any recommendation?
Old 09-16-2015, 02:32 PM
  #9  
Andy Roe
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Andy Roe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bologna, Italy
Posts: 3,605
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I believe that the GT3 block actually has a 964 part number?! Some info here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_911_GT3

Agree that the 964 engine issues are way over blown and most do seem to be rebuilt due to leaks than actual wear or failures.
Old 09-16-2015, 03:24 PM
  #10  
jeanhules
Banned
 
jeanhules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 179
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'm at 181K with a rebuild at 100K. I plan on doing another rebuild at around 250K-300K which won't be for a while. Car is running great, just have to stay ahead of any problems with maintenance.
Old 09-16-2015, 04:25 PM
  #11  
Goughary
Race Car
 
Goughary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: fairfield, CT
Posts: 4,865
Likes: 0
Received 431 Likes on 279 Posts
Default Engine longevity

Originally Posted by Andy Roe
I believe that the GT3 block actually has a 964 part number?! Some info here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_911_GT3

Agree that the 964 engine issues are way over blown and most do seem to be rebuilt due to leaks than actual wear or failures.
The reason the gt3 and the turbo don't have the ims issues, is because they are based on our motor...tidbit...
Old 09-17-2015, 02:25 AM
  #12  
Mixter
Burning Brakes
 
Mixter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Abbotsford, BC
Posts: 782
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Why so many rebuilds

Here's a tread I started a while back. Received some good feedback that may help answer questions on engine longevity.
https://rennlist.com/forums/964-foru...-rebuilds.html
Old 09-17-2015, 10:39 AM
  #13  
Mondrian
Three Wheelin'
 
Mondrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Carrera 3.2 engine is generally considered to be the most reliable of the aircooled engines so normal for others to fall short on mileage. 100k is about right for a 964 topend rebuild, some even earlier and a few have gone way past the 100k mark. Early cars (pre 91) would probably have had a reseal way before the 100k mark.
Old 09-18-2015, 03:28 PM
  #14  
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cleveland Georgia
Posts: 6,968
Received 2,293 Likes on 903 Posts
Default

Most of the engines I build for the 964 and 993 are usually from serious oil leaks that require tear down to completely adress. Seldom do we see failures of the engines, most all are elective builds, and some are just becaiuse someone wants more power.
Old 09-18-2015, 04:38 PM
  #15  
davidwilson11
Racer
 
davidwilson11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 489
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Goughary
Most haven't been rebuilt. Many on the forum, have had top end rebuilds, and some have had full rebuild down to the crank.

Most didn't need it. Some needed it, and some wouldn't run without it.

You've got a few things at play. Your average 911 owner isn't on rennlist. That's first. So you don't hear from the happy guy at home who just smirks when he sees the inevitable oil on the garage floor and drives away...he's not a forum guy, and most aren't.

Forum people tend to be two types. Fixers and modders. Both are way more likely to open the motor to fix something that doesn't really "need" to be fixed. Fixers will fix something that's broken or go after marginable hp gains. Modders will fix things that aren't broken, make things look cooler, and go after massive hp gains where they rarely get much at all, but have gone down a slippery slope getting there...if you hang with either group, you will begin to believe that much work is to be done, when really, in most cases, it would have been ok to let it go and drive the car...

I'll give an example. I bought my car w 58k on it. Engine tray was on. Traffic, and subsequent burnt valves, crap caked all over everything. Oil dripping from everywhere it could find a place to drip from. Car ran fine. Cold, it had zero compression. But there was a strange noise. A tick I didn't like. Felt slow. Wasn't perfect.
I spent 20k doing a top end rebuild. Slippery slope, replaced everything. Car since, runs fine. Feels slow (because it is), and no longer drips. Did I need the rebuild? Thought I did. Maybe I did. Glad I did. But it ran. And it isn't faster.
Cold, zero compression. Hot, had compression, just not perfect. I likely gained a few hp doing the top end build, but on the street, not being timed, you just aren't going to notice (in real terms).

Well maintained, these cars will literally go forever. Lack of maintenance, and they will need maintenance. No big deal.

If I were looking to buy one, however, since so many of us have rebuilt the motors, I'd be looking for a car with a good rebuild. More because most of the people driving up the prices don't really understand what they are looking at, and will pay a huge premium for lower miles, and a higher miles car with better maintenance will go cheaper and would usually be a better car, because it's owners made it that way.


That's the best explanation I've heard that describes me. It didn't really need done but you know what in my mind it did..... Love the cars, love fixing and improving anything I can. Well said dude.


Quick Reply: Engine longevity



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:06 AM.