Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fitment question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2014 | 03:42 PM
  #1  
n.dino's Avatar
n.dino
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Default Fitment question

Will these work on a narrow body C2?

18x8.5 ET40 backspacing 6.25 (1"outer 7.5"inner)

18x11 ET60 backspacing 8.375
(1.5"outer 9.5"inner)

Rears I'm not too worried about because I can add a spacer but any information would be appreciated.

From my knowledge they were on a 993 Cup Car.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2014 | 03:48 PM
  #2  
Vandit's Avatar
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,613
Likes: 52
From: DFW, TX
Default

You're gonna have to align the car aggressive for fitment and probably massage the metal to make room, and even then they might still rub slightly. Are you planning on running normal sized tires or going for the under-tired stretch/stance look? Are you planning on driving the car hard or cruising/hard parking?
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2014 | 03:54 PM
  #3  
Vandit's Avatar
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,613
Likes: 52
From: DFW, TX
Default

Read through BLACK-BETTY's response in this thread. That's a good example of an aggressive setup w/ lots of rubber on the road and function in mind.
https://rennlist.com/rennforums/show...=796443&page=3
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2014 | 06:06 PM
  #4  
BLACK-BETTY's Avatar
BLACK-BETTY
Drifting
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,360
Likes: 6
From: UK
Default

Hi!

You'll also find even more wheel info on the first post of my thread 'Back in Black'.

PM anytime with wheel specs.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2014 | 02:27 PM
  #5  
Rey Gunn's Avatar
Rey Gunn
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 788
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Default

Does anyone know what the offsets would be for the most aggressive setup without having to roll the fenders? Trying to decide what way to go on my new wheels. I'm thinking 10et43 on the rears and 8.5et48 on the front. Thanks in advance.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2014 | 03:12 PM
  #6  
Maxxvr's Avatar
Maxxvr
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Western NY
Default

Originally Posted by Rey Gunn
Does anyone know what the offsets would be for the most aggressive setup without having to roll the fenders? Trying to decide what way to go on my new wheels. I'm thinking 10et43 on the rears and 8.5et48 on the front. Thanks in advance.
That would be close. DuWerke has 10 et46 and 8.5 et46 with gently massaged fenders because of how low he is. If you don't go as low you can get away with it, or add more neg camber.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2014 | 03:41 PM
  #7  
BLACK-BETTY's Avatar
BLACK-BETTY
Drifting
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,360
Likes: 6
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Rey Gunn
Does anyone know what the offsets would be for the most aggressive setup without having to roll the fenders? Trying to decide what way to go on my new wheels. I'm thinking 10et43 on the rears and 8.5et48 on the front. Thanks in advance.
Oooo don't know that one. That's a trial and error campaign that'll involve spacers. You know... rolling arches ain't that tough.

You need to find a body shop that's got one of these. Then a heat gun and you're away.

Originally Posted by Maxxvr
That would be close. DuWerke has 10 et46 and 8.5 et46 with gently massaged fenders because of how low he is. If you don't go as low you can get away with it, or add more neg camber.
Yup - but that's with stretch tyres so not applicable for standard tyres. For reference I'm running ET47 8.5J 225 and ET32 10J 265.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg
images.jpeg (8.6 KB, 179 views)
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2014 | 03:59 PM
  #8  
Rey Gunn's Avatar
Rey Gunn
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 788
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by Maxxvr
That would be close. DuWerke has 10 et46 and 8.5 et46 with gently massaged fenders because of how low he is. If you don't go as low you can get away with it, or add more neg camber.
Thanks for the specs. Gives me something to work with.

Originally Posted by BLACK-BETTY
Oooo don't know that one. That's a trial and error campaign that'll involve spacers. You know... rolling arches ain't that tough.

You need to find a body shop that's got one of these. Then a heat gun and you're away.



Yup - but that's with stretch tyres so not applicable for standard tyres. For reference I'm running ET47 8.5J 225 and ET32 10J 265.
Frank, I've seen your numbers. That rear ET seems like it would make the wheels stick out so much more than it shows on your pic. But you're right, a bit of trial and error is what I'm going to have to do. Will look into the rolled arches. The wheels I have are 8.5 ET 52 and 10 ET 47. So I will also look into getting spacers to achieve the look I want.

Thanks again Maxxvr and Frank for the quick response.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2014 | 04:16 PM
  #9  
deutschland-dobson's Avatar
deutschland-dobson
Three Wheelin'
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 3
From: NE England :)
Default

Quick one regarding arch rolling, not many companies have a 'roller that will for the Porsche PCD. It took me a while to find someone who could do the front and rear.

Chris
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2014 | 08:53 PM
  #10  
BLACK-BETTY's Avatar
BLACK-BETTY
Drifting
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,360
Likes: 6
From: UK
Default

Pic for Dino attached as requested.

Originally Posted by Rey Gunn
Frank, I've seen your numbers. That rear ET seems like it would make the wheels stick out so much more than it shows on your pic.
It's the -3 degrees of negative camber that tucks them in. Note -3 is very aggressive especially for a C2 non dedicated track car.

Originally Posted by Rey Gunn
The wheels I have are 8.5 ET 52 and 10 ET 47.
That's an ideal starting point. In my mind - set your ideal geo first, then get the wheels on and see what spacers you need.

What's worth noting - I wouldn't recommend it safe to use shims bigger than 5mm. Should you wish to - I suggest changing the wheel carrier studs for longer ones so the thread is not further reduced.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
BBS E28 Detail shots 001.jpg (184.6 KB, 153 views)
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2014 | 01:38 AM
  #11  
Rey Gunn's Avatar
Rey Gunn
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 788
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by BLACK-BETTY
It's the -3 degrees of negative camber that tucks them in. Note -3 is very aggressive especially for a C2 non dedicated track car.

That's an ideal starting point. In my mind - set your ideal geo first, then get the wheels on and see what spacers you need.

What's worth noting - I wouldn't recommend it safe to use shims bigger than 5mm. Should you wish to - I suggest changing the wheel carrier studs for longer ones so the thread is not further reduced.
Thanks Frank. Duly noted on all points. Will do a follow up once I get the wheels back and mounted on the car.
Reply




All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:23 PM.