Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PDK and aircooled engine in a 964... whats the route of least resistance?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2014, 01:25 PM
  #16  
Ken D
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Ken D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,056
Received 79 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JasonAndreas
The Ruf EKS might be your best bet?
I had thought of that, but RUF no longer supports it.
Old 01-21-2014, 02:14 PM
  #17  
tcsracing1
Rennlist Member
 
tcsracing1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere in a galaxy far, far away....
Posts: 17,107
Likes: 0
Received 259 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by simps
This is way above my technical and mechanical pay grade so wondering if there is anyone around who might be able to tell me how this could be done if at all.

I am happy to consider any air cooled engine with as much power as a 2wd could cope with. I assume there could be other auxiliary areas of a later car that might need to be included like traction control / abs ....

The reasoning behind this is that I have finally saved enough to start a 964 backdate project that will be fairly extensive in terms of quality and spec and feel the 964 C2 engine and tip gearbox will be the weak link. I also appreciate that to many the thought of doing this project without a manual gearbox is boarding on sacrilegious (this is not an option for my circumstance) and I hope that the PDK will add some interest and better driver involvement.

Thank you in advance for any help with this.
Best advice is to walk away from this idea.

PDK is only going to happen with a 3.8L DFI water cooled engine and electronics from a 2009+ (Plan on at least $25k for that combo from a wreck)
This set up would be interesting but with PDK there is zero driver involvement.

This project will eat 3000+ man hours and at least $100k in hard cash. (And that is if you do not walk away from the project)

I suggest buying a PDK 997 and give it the sport classic theme or backdate a tiptronic 964 with a strong 3.8L.
Old 01-21-2014, 03:34 PM
  #18  
circleswim
Advanced
 
circleswim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: South Wales, UK
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would love to have PDK in mine also but figured its never going to happen. Instead I retrofitted shift paddles that can be used in manual mode... see link below:

https://rennlist.com/forums/964-foru...tiptronic.html
Old 01-21-2014, 04:10 PM
  #19  
Jjm4life
Three Wheelin'
 
Jjm4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Without having anything of value to add...


Why?

Whats the point of the exercise? Just to see it done? Why the pdk love?
Old 01-21-2014, 04:12 PM
  #20  
STUARTQ
Three Wheelin'
 
STUARTQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,595
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Funny, I don't want a paddle shift for my 964, it's a manual anyway, but I've had steering wheel paddles on a number of cars. One of them being a Brabus Smart and if I've been driving that around, then jump into the 964, I'm forever trying to change gear with paddles that aren't there.

I don't agree that paddles make driving less involving, it can be much quicker and smoother.
Old 01-21-2014, 04:20 PM
  #21  
StanUK951
Burning Brakes
 
StanUK951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: London, England
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I assume there is a medical reason for wanting a clutch less gearbox...

The Ruf system is supposed to be very good. I recall a Running Report write up in 911 & Porsche World from a guy with a 993 RS many years ago. He had high praise for the system. If you can track down one of these that would be interesting. You need a manual car as a basis I believe.
Old 01-21-2014, 05:22 PM
  #22  
vagluv
Burning Brakes
 
vagluv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by StanUK951
I assume there is a medical reason for wanting a clutch less gearbox...
My thinking, but didnt want to ask. If its not medical then get a dsg gti to daily!
Old 01-21-2014, 05:43 PM
  #23  
GazC2
Burning Brakes
 
GazC2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Perthshire, Scotland
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by StanUK951
I assume there is a medical reason for wanting a clutch less gearbox...

The Ruf system is supposed to be very good. I recall a Running Report write up in 911 & Porsche World from a guy with a 993 RS many years ago. He had high praise for the system. If you can track down one of these that would be interesting. You need a manual car as a basis I believe.
I read an article that said it was a good system "when" it worked but was not very reliable which was maybe why Ruf dropped it ?
Old 01-21-2014, 10:06 PM
  #24  
ACSGP
Pro
 
ACSGP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by StanUK951
I assume there is a medical reason for wanting a clutch less gearbox...

The Ruf system is supposed to be very good. I recall a Running Report write up in 911 & Porsche World from a guy with a 993 RS many years ago. He had high praise for the system. If you can track down one of these that would be interesting. You need a manual car as a basis I believe.
Porsche used to endorse the box, but unfortunately, they were a bugger to fix and very expensive. It was quietly dropped, any many owners switched their cars to a manual set-up.

On the OP's questions, PDKs are too complicated, especially since they are only fitted to the new, non-Metzger engine blocks.

But you may want to consider the 996 gearbox, which I'm told will fit with mods. Or more interestingly, a 997.1 Turbo 7 speeder, which can take up to 1000 Nm of torque. It's also a quick shift ZF box. Paddles could be fitted I suppose.
Old 02-09-2014, 03:19 PM
  #25  
gristle101
Instructor
 
gristle101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

997.1 turbo 7 speeder? The manual offered on the 997.1 was a 6 speed, and the tiptronic (tiptronic S) was a 5 speed. The PDK as we all know is 7 speed and there is also the 991 7 speed manual. So which one were you referring to?
Old 02-09-2014, 10:09 PM
  #26  
ACSGP
Pro
 
ACSGP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gristle101
997.1 turbo 7 speeder? The manual offered on the 997.1 was a 6 speed, and the tiptronic (tiptronic S) was a 5 speed. The PDK as we all know is 7 speed and there is also the 991 7 speed manual. So which one were you referring to?
Ah, stand corrected, it's the 5 speed quick shift tip:

Ever since we dumped the clutch at 4000 rpm in the latest, 997-based, 480-hp 911 Turbo, we've been keeping the Tiptronic (Porsche-speak for automatic) version in the back of our mind. That's because Porsche's claimed acceleration times for the slushbox Turbo are 0.3-second quicker to 60 mph.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take-road-test

The other thing as well is that PDKs were never fitted on Metzger or Metzger based engines, that's why I find the 997.1 Turbo more interesting. Can take far more torque than a PDK based 997.2 Turbo as well.
Old 02-09-2014, 11:55 PM
  #27  
gristle101
Instructor
 
gristle101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ah, good to know; I've always "dabbled" with this idea; I had to know for sure which one you were talking about.



Quick Reply: PDK and aircooled engine in a 964... whats the route of least resistance?!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:09 PM.