Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Suspension questions (KW related)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2012, 06:13 PM
  #16  
evoderby
Pro
 
evoderby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ras62
Not much point in talking about springs in isolation, both V1 and V3 systems work very well according to the feedback no matter the spring rates are different to others. The spring rates for the V3 as fitted to an RS are 170/515.
.
Ah ok....I can sleep well again.
Old 02-23-2012, 12:49 AM
  #17  
Shamus964
Pro
 
Shamus964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Just to clarify my earlier post - when I said the fronts seemed soft to me, that wasn't based on having installed the stock springs then swapping them - I uprated them prior to install.

I feel the fronts are a bit soft based on the feedback of my local p-car gurus, info on the optimal ratio (front/rear) and also because of the handling characteristics I wanted. I knew that I wanted to reduce front end dive and run the car low so given this, the idea of using what amounts to the stock C2 front spring rates seemed suboptimal. The rates I used (40 nm) are within the specs of the shocks, and the rate is not aggressive when compared to other setups so it seemed like an easy decision.

YMMV



Quick Reply: Suspension questions (KW related)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:04 PM.