Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Drag Coefficient Comparo to 918 Spyder

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2010, 01:28 PM
  #1  
Gdog
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
Gdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Marcos, CA
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking Drag Coefficient Comparo to 918 Spyder

The May 2010 issue of Automobile Magazine has an extensive writeup on the Porsche concept XG10 also unofficially known as the 918 Spyder. This is a hybrid with a 3.4 liter V-8 with 495 hp and three electric motors on board that add an additional 215 hp. Projected to get 78 mpg.

One of the first things I learned in business school is to never believe your own press releases. I'll wait and see if they ever produce the car.

But of interest was the touting of the speed of the 918 beating the currently produced Carrera GT. One of the reasons, says Porsche engineer Gernot Dollner, was that the drag coefficient of the proposed 918 was lower than the GT--.34 for the 918 versus .39 for the Carrera GT.

Should somebody tell him the drag coefficient of the 964 is a paltry .32? It's cool to think that a 21-year old vehicle has a lower drag coefficient than the latest green machine proposed by Porsche.
Old 05-29-2010, 01:41 PM
  #2  
cmat
Racer
 
cmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Woodstock, IL
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I suspect that the newer cars have much higher down force which has the disadvantage of increasing the drag coeficient.
Old 05-29-2010, 02:03 PM
  #3  
LastMezger
Rennlist Member
 
LastMezger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: 6th gear!
Posts: 4,316
Received 139 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cmat
I suspect that the newer cars have much higher down force which has the disadvantage of increasing the drag coeficient.
+1 and it likely has much wider tires too which really doesn't help.
Old 05-29-2010, 02:05 PM
  #4  
964Q
Rennlist Member
 
964Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SD/LA, CA
Posts: 804
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Is the 0.32 drag coefficient with the tail up or down?
Old 05-29-2010, 04:43 PM
  #5  
Jack667
Rennlist Member
 
Jack667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Milton, GA
Posts: 2,262
Received 116 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

and a Honda Odyssey is .30


according to wikipedia/wiki/Automobile_drag_coefficient
Old 05-29-2010, 08:00 PM
  #6  
LastMezger
Rennlist Member
 
LastMezger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: 6th gear!
Posts: 4,316
Received 139 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jack667
and a Honda Odyssey is .30


according to wikipedia/wiki/Automobile_drag_coefficient
Makes sense given the long flat sides and relatively narrow tires.
Old 05-30-2010, 05:26 AM
  #7  
warmfuzzies
Drifting
 
warmfuzzies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: colchester UK
Posts: 2,464
Received 25 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jack667
and a Honda Odyssey is .30


according to wikipedia/wiki/Automobile_drag_coefficient
Isn't drag relative to desire? hence why the Honda would be so low?




kevin



Quick Reply: Drag Coefficient Comparo to 918 Spyder



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:13 PM.