Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Next weight saving project

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 10, 2006 | 06:00 PM
  #31  
FamilyCar's Avatar
FamilyCar
Instructor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 163
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

Why not just get an aluminum hat w/ floating rotor. I bet the weight savings would be greater.

I'm installing such a set up front in a few weeks for use w/ big reds. I will weigh the new set up. Once the solild 1 pc comes off I shall weigh that as well and post the weights.
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 07:13 PM
  #32  
N51's Avatar
N51
Drifting
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 0
From: behind the Corn Curtain
Default

Originally Posted by FamilyCar
Why not just get an aluminum hat w/ floating rotor. I bet the weight savings would be greate.
I'm considering this but wonder about the overall weight savings considering the larger calipers. I've been unsuccessfully searching for a rotor replacement for my stock setup but using aluminum hats.
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 08:22 PM
  #33  
jeff522's Avatar
jeff522
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: Joplin, Mo
Default

I still say one of the best weight savings would be the driver loosing some weight.It would have to be safer than drilling rotor hats.
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 08:27 PM
  #34  
Marc Shaw's Avatar
Marc Shaw
Super Duper Moderator
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,773
Likes: 21
From: YQU
Default

Originally Posted by N51
I'm considering this but wonder about the overall weight savings considering the larger calipers. I've been unsuccessfully searching for a rotor replacement for my stock setup but using aluminum hats.
You can find floating rotors here but they are not for a stock setup.

Marc
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 09:05 PM
  #35  
FamilyCar's Avatar
FamilyCar
Instructor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 163
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

N51,
You are probably correct. One would need to know the weights of standard v big red calipers as well, to know for sure. I already had big reds, so going w/ the aluminum hat/floating rotor from 965 1pc rotors was an easy decision from a weight reduction standpoint.

I am not aware of an aluminum hat for the stock diameter rotor, as I haven't looked into it. It seemed like it was worth bringing up though.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 06:00 AM
  #36  
pauline964's Avatar
pauline964
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Default

kgorman
....There is a fine line between 'smart' weight savings and 'sickness'. Seek help!
excuse me, you call me sick?????????

jeff522
I still say one of the best weight savings would be the driver loosing some weight.It would have to be safer than drilling rotor hats.
I agree with you when it comes to driver's weight, I am OK there, that's for sure

As posted before, I'm using two piece rotors at the front, without hat
one rotor is 15,43lbs (on my scale). The rear org. rotors have the the same
weight.

Unfortunately, there is no company out there, that is doing a two piece rear rotor like the original one ( I need handbrake for TÜV).
Reply




All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:06 PM.