Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

9m 4.0 litre 964/993 engine in development

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2006 | 09:05 PM
  #46  
pcar964's Avatar
pcar964
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by NineMeister
OK guys, I know exactly where you are coming from, but why aren't you pointing your question at Porsche instead of me? Should you not be asking them why they have spent millions of Euros developing the high hp n/a GT3/R/RS/RSR engines when they could have just fitted a low boost GT2 engine and saved the expense?

I cannot vouch for the USA, but in the UK and Europe the GT3 is one of the most popular trackday cars around and not one of their owners would exchange their's for a GT2 even if you paid them, so I guess that I am not alone in thinking that high hp n/a engines are the most rewarding to drive on the track. However the core answer that Porsche would give is the same as mine earlier in the thread, Porsche need a high hp n/a engine for racing, and it is this same demand that has led us to build the 9m 4.0 engine.

But, as with Porsche, the 9m race engine developments can be translated onto road cars without having to go the whole hog. So in a similar way in that you can drive to the shops with your 380bhp GT3 rather than a 490bhp RSR engine, by just fitting the 9m heads and cams you can pop to the mart in a 350bhp 993 and still return 30mpg (which is something you will never do if you have a 930 engine in the back).

We all have to accept that there are alternative approaches to any requirement but as ever guys, each to there own I guess.

Not to speak for others, but I know myself and at least two others here are looking for a way to get some serious power gains (at least 350bhp) in our 964/993s without spending too much. I realize this might be a pipe dream, which is why I'm considering all options including dropping an old 930 motor in there.

I think what you guys are doing at Ninemeister is awesome, and I wish more people were as skilled and innovative as you guys in the Porsche aftermarket. Maybe if these kits became more popular/mainstream, the prices would be more in line with the average Joe's budget.

Forgive me if you've already covered this, but I didn't find it - what would the 350bhp kit cost for a 3.6? You mentioned heads and cams, is that all it takes?
Old 02-13-2006 | 12:40 AM
  #47  
Chris M.'s Avatar
Chris M.
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,274
Likes: 100
From: Prospect, KY
Default

Not to speak for others, but I know myself and at least two others here are looking for a way to get some serious power gains (at least 350bhp) in our 964/993s without spending too much.
Isn't the TPC kit the best/cheapest way to achieve this? It's not NA but it sounds like 350hp NA is going to be VERY expensive; certainly more than the $10-15K that the TPC kit costs.

c
Old 02-13-2006 | 04:32 AM
  #48  
James.E's Avatar
James.E
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: London
Default

A 930 engine is a good base engine for serious power, but i think you'd regret swapping one in without spending ££££ on it first....
Old 02-13-2006 | 06:27 AM
  #49  
NineMeister's Avatar
NineMeister
Thread Starter
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 194
From: Cheshire, England
Red face

Originally Posted by pcar964
Not to speak for others, but I know myself and at least two others here are looking for a way to get some serious power gains (at least 350bhp) in our 964/993s without spending too much. I realize this might be a pipe dream, which is why I'm considering all options including dropping an old 930 motor in there.

I think what you guys are doing at Ninemeister is awesome, and I wish more people were as skilled and innovative as you guys in the Porsche aftermarket. Maybe if these kits became more popular/mainstream, the prices would be more in line with the average Joe's budget.

Forgive me if you've already covered this, but I didn't find it - what would the 350bhp kit cost for a 3.6? You mentioned heads and cams, is that all it takes?

Thanks for the encouragement.

The 993 engine conversion is covered pretty comprehensively in this post:
https://rennlist.com/forums/993-forum/243898-engine-upgrade-993-a.html

We are currently offering the head/cam/spring kit package at £5995 for the 964, 993 & 993RS engines.
To answer your specific question to achieve this power with the 993 the total cost of the fitted package including the 100 cell (N-GT style) cats, misc parts (gaskets, oil, etc) and the labour to screw it all together is just over £10k + taxes.
The 964 conversion is complicated by the fact that the standard engine management system will not support this hp without modifications, our recommendation would be to convert to Motec but this is not the only solution to getting more fuel into the engine.
Old 02-13-2006 | 09:40 AM
  #50  
Red rooster's Avatar
Red rooster
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Default

Colin,
The 993 Motronic M2.1.1 will support 350bhp but the 964 M2.1 wont ??
I would have thought that both were over the limit for fuel availability so a set of injectors and a re-map would be the fix ? or is air flow measurement the problem - flap versus Hot Film ?

I could do with a 350bhp snow plough this morning !!

Geoff
Old 02-13-2006 | 02:40 PM
  #51  
pcar964's Avatar
pcar964
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by NineMeister
Thanks for the encouragement.

The 993 engine conversion is covered pretty comprehensively in this post:
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthread.php?t=243898

We are currently offering the head/cam/spring kit package at £5995 for the 964, 993 & 993RS engines.
To answer your specific question to achieve this power with the 993 the total cost of the fitted package including the 100 cell (N-GT style) cats, misc parts (gaskets, oil, etc) and the labour to screw it all together is just over £10k + taxes.
The 964 conversion is complicated by the fact that the standard engine management system will not support this hp without modifications, our recommendation would be to convert to Motec but this is not the only solution to getting more fuel into the engine.
Thanks Colin, good info. I assume that a somewhat competent DIY mechanic could install the parts themselves, and have you guys do the custom tuning afterwards? Also I'm guessing that cat bypasses could be used in place of the 100 cell cats...

Would this kit produce a more flat torque curve, or is it more peaky?
Old 02-13-2006 | 03:06 PM
  #52  
NineMeister's Avatar
NineMeister
Thread Starter
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 194
From: Cheshire, England
Default

Originally Posted by Red rooster
Colin,
The 993 Motronic M2.1.1 will support 350bhp but the 964 M2.1 wont ??
I would have thought that both were over the limit for fuel availability so a set of injectors and a re-map would be the fix ? or is air flow measurement the problem - flap versus Hot Film ?

The 964 system has a restrictive air flow meter, no throttle potentiometers and injectors that are on their flow limits with standard engines. You could go down the route that you suggest or fit a Motec system as we recommend, the choice is yours.
The most important aspect is that whichever ecu you choose is that it must be custom mapped to the specification of the engine.


Originally Posted by pcar964
I assume that a somewhat competent DIY mechanic could install the parts themselves, and have you guys do the custom tuning afterwards? Also I'm guessing that cat bypasses could be used in place of the 100 cell cats...

Would this kit produce a more flat torque curve, or is it more peaky?

The whole point of our development is to be able to sell the heads & cams as bolt on items that require no special skills to fit, other than those of a competant Porsche technician. There is no tricky machining, no measurements to check or compare other than cam timing and definitely no snakeoil required.

Cat bypasses could be used instead of cats, but there will be no advantage in terms of power, in testing we could not measure any performance differences between the original Porsche silencers and a pair of Techart silencers other than noise, so my conclusion is that with a properly tuned intake system the 964/993 engine is less sensitive to exhaust changes.
Old 02-13-2006 | 07:33 PM
  #53  
Red rooster's Avatar
Red rooster
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Default

Colin,
Can I confirm that my Euro 993 non vario motor which makes 274 bhp right now will make a measured 350 bhp if I fit your heads and cams ?
Are there any other parts needed?

Have you got a timing/fuelling specification to ensure correct mapping ?

Sorry if this sounds a bit too the point but £5k for 50bhp more than I thought possible has my attention !!!!!!!!

Thanks

Geoff
Old 02-13-2006 | 07:45 PM
  #54  
viperbob's Avatar
viperbob
Former Vendor
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,849
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by NineMeister
Cooling a 450bhp n/a engine is technically easier to achieve than a 450bhp turbo, so since Porsche sanctioned a 450bhp option for the 993TT and GT2 there is absolutely no issue with heat at this power level.
Yes, but the Turbo S used an additional small oil cooler in the front bumper, and the GT2 used a larger oil cooler in place of the AC condensor in the left front of the car. I don't see this priced into your offerings. Is it already included?
Old 02-13-2006 | 08:15 PM
  #55  
NineMeister's Avatar
NineMeister
Thread Starter
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 194
From: Cheshire, England
Default

Originally Posted by Red rooster
Colin,
Can I confirm that my Euro 993 non vario motor which makes 274 bhp right now will make a measured 350 bhp if I fit your heads and cams ?
Are there any other parts needed?

Have you got a timing/fuelling specification to ensure correct mapping ?
I have a 95 993 in the workshop now that is having the first NVR conversion with heads, cams & cats. The ecu will be remapped on completion, so pretty soon we will have the answers to both questions. I will post the result on the 993 board for obvious reasons, so keep your eye open.
Old 02-13-2006 | 08:26 PM
  #56  
NineMeister's Avatar
NineMeister
Thread Starter
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 194
From: Cheshire, England
Default

Originally Posted by viperbob
Yes, but the Turbo S used an additional small oil cooler in the front bumper, and the GT2 used a larger oil cooler in place of the AC condensor in the left front of the car. I don't see this priced into your offerings. Is it already included?

You are right Bob about the oil coolers on the turbo cars, however n/a engines do not have the heat issues to deal with that are experienced with turbos because they are typically running with up to 50% less cylinder pressure (read torque) so the transferred heat from the piston to the oil is radically less.

I can confirm from my own experience of my 993RSR, which is fitted with a 400+bhp 3.8 version of the 9m race engine, that although a small additional oil cooler is desirable for distance racing, it is unneccesary for short events, the odd track day at 9.5/10ths and road use. So no, the oil cooler is not included in the price but is obviously available to those who would like one.
Old 02-14-2006 | 12:13 AM
  #57  
pcar964's Avatar
pcar964
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by NineMeister
I have a 95 993 in the workshop now that is having the first NVR conversion with heads, cams & cats. The ecu will be remapped on completion, so pretty soon we will have the answers to both questions. I will post the result on the 993 board for obvious reasons, so keep your eye open.
OK, is anyone else excited as hell about this, or is it just me? Can't wait to see the results!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!
Old 02-14-2006 | 01:18 AM
  #58  
Chris M.'s Avatar
Chris M.
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,274
Likes: 100
From: Prospect, KY
Default

OK, is anyone else excited as hell about this, or is it just me?
Yes, this appears to be the future of the air-cooled 3.6...

c
Old 02-14-2006 | 05:33 AM
  #59  
Caveman's Avatar
Caveman
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,276
Likes: 19
From: Bucks, England
Default

Yes, though I have already had one argument with my wife when I sounded out the water and said "if my car needs a top-end rebuild in five to ten years I'd like to do this cool upgrade"! I can see I'm going to have to lay the ground work very carefully for this one....

Cheers,

David
Old 02-14-2006 | 09:04 AM
  #60  
Monique's Avatar
Monique
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 3
From: Europe
Default

Originally Posted by Caveman
.... and said "if my car needs a top-end rebuild in five to ten years I'd like to do this cool upgrade"! I can see I'm going to have to lay the ground work very carefully for this one....
5 to 10 years heh? You could be laying more than a new plan by then. Marriages are not always permanent.


Quick Reply: 9m 4.0 litre 964/993 engine in development



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:44 AM.