Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dyno results for exhaust changes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2005, 02:18 PM
  #16  
Red rooster
Three Wheelin'
 
Red rooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Garrett376,
I guess you have the answer now ! On Euro spec 964 a Cup pipe or straight through silencer can give up to +10 bhp flywheel .Final silencer +2/3 .Cat bypass almost nothing but the car feels so much more responsive especially at less than 4000.Trickey old things these motors.
Geoff
Old 05-28-2005, 02:45 PM
  #17  
forklift
Rennlist Member
 
forklift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 2,182
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I think his info. shows +14 with the cat bypass, which is impressive and almost enough for me to break out the checkbook.
Old 05-28-2005, 03:24 PM
  #18  
Red rooster
Three Wheelin'
 
Red rooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Go for it!!

Geoff
Old 05-28-2005, 05:33 PM
  #19  
garrett376
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
garrett376's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,467
Received 625 Likes on 480 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by forklift
I think his info. shows +14 with the cat bypass, which is impressive and almost enough for me to break out the checkbook.

Yeah, I'm with Geoff - make the order forklift!!! I am glad to see that the system I am running is the best from Tom's findings. Luck of the draw! Actually, the G-pipe was cheaper when I was shopping around and I wanted the greater weight reduction from the secondary removal.
Old 05-29-2005, 12:25 AM
  #20  
agentpennypacker
Pro
 
agentpennypacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mighty Kansas City
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Is anyone running primary and secondary bypasses and leaving the cat on? Any thoughts on this?
Old 05-29-2005, 02:17 AM
  #21  
Wachuko
Professor of Pending Projects
Rennlist Member
 
Wachuko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9,891
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Tom W
I've now completed the sequence for the dyno results as a result of my misguided venture looking for more hp in all the wrong places...

Stock headers, cat, primary, secondary bypass: 230 rwhp
Stock headers, fabspeed cat bypass, primary, secondary bypass: 244 rwhp
Fabspeed equal length headers (no heat exchangers), Fabspeed muffler: 239 rwhp

At tests on the same dyno with very similar weather (temp and humidity).

So, now that I've passed my semi-annual smog test, the cat comes back off and I add the cat bypass back. Headers and muffler have been returned to Fabspeed. The added benefit of this configuration is it easily passes sound requirements at Laguna Seca (at 89 db) while the fancy headers and muffler were way too loud (96 db).
Thank you!! Any plans of testing a different primary?

Stock headers, fabspeed cat bypass, aftermarket primary, secondary bypass(G-Pipe): ??? rwhp If hp stays the same at least we should loose some weight with that change...

Can you share how much $$ was the cat-bypass? Was it this one?:


I current have

Stock headers, stock cat, stock primary, and secondary bypass (G-Pipe)...

Thanks again for the tests done and sharing the data with us... you just saved a few of us time and $$.


Last edited by Wachuko; 05-29-2005 at 02:32 AM.
Old 05-29-2005, 02:19 AM
  #22  
Wachuko
Professor of Pending Projects
Rennlist Member
 
Wachuko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9,891
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by agentpennypacker
Is anyone running primary and secondary bypasses and leaving the cat on? Any thoughts on this?

I will have to search on a few topics that discussed this... but if I remember correctly the lack of back pressure made the car loose hp instead of increasing it...
Old 05-29-2005, 11:14 AM
  #23  
ronone10
Racer
 
ronone10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Easton, Maryland
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am a new tiptronic 964 owner and would like to know if the horsepower gains are the same for a tip equipped 964? I am happy with the stock performance and the only mod on my list is to lower it to euro specs. But, I may get the bug down the road....

Ron
'93 C2 Guards Red
Old 05-29-2005, 01:05 PM
  #24  
Tom W
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Tom W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 4,483
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Jaime: That appears to be the cat bypass I have. I have no plans to replace the primary as I've spent enough time and effort going nowhere with what I've already tried. I will not do a primary bypass due to sound restrictions at tracks I like (especially Laguna Seca). Yes, I may be able to loose a couple more pounds of weight, but at this point I'm going to concentrate on driver skill as a method of improving lap times.
Old 05-29-2005, 02:41 PM
  #25  
Scooter92
Instructor
 
Scooter92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Not to hijack the thread, but I have some questions directly on point. I recently picked up a full B&B exhaust system for a really great price, and now I have to decide about installation. I currently run a primary bypass and chip from Steve Weiner and was thinking about the cat bypass when I found the B&B. Questions after the installation of B&B: 1) how should my car act, relative to my current setup (i.e., torque, hp, etc)? 2) if I remap my chip, should I get even more power? 3) should I pass emmissions without a problem? 4) any downside to going with aftermarket headers?

I am expecting to get the performance Tom got in his test, maybe more with a dialed in chip. I got such a great deal on the B&B, I had to buy it. Given what I am running now vs. the B&B, I am expecting a noticable difference.

Ron, I may sell my primary bypass if I get the result that I am looking for. Being local, it may be a good opportunity for you to upgrade.
Old 05-29-2005, 06:39 PM
  #26  
H964
Rennlist Member
 
H964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: miami, Florida
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

hi, iam in the process of running a cat bypass and a primary bypass. thats the best set up i think based on reading countless threads here on rennlist, but now iam all confused again.
i thought the primary was a lot heavier than the secondary?? right??
Old 05-29-2005, 07:44 PM
  #27  
garrett376
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
garrett376's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,467
Received 625 Likes on 480 Posts
Default

The primary is heavier based on published info, but when you look at the total weight saved (the primary BYPASS is heavier than the secondary bypass) for the installation, the secondary bypass comes out saving more weight.
Old 05-29-2005, 10:10 PM
  #28  
Wachuko
Professor of Pending Projects
Rennlist Member
 
Wachuko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9,891
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Tom W
Jaime: That appears to be the cat bypass I have. I have no plans to replace the primary as I've spent enough time and effort going nowhere with what I've already tried. I will not do a primary bypass due to sound restrictions at tracks I like (especially Laguna Seca). Yes, I may be able to loose a couple more pounds of weight, but at this point I'm going to concentrate on driver skill as a method of improving lap times.
Thank you... one more item on the wish list
Old 05-30-2005, 01:52 AM
  #29  
Tom W
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Tom W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 4,483
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Scooter: You can talk to Steve about the chip and if he recommends a different one for the different exhaust. I doubt you will pass emissions with the cat bypass. My car is a track only car and not a general street car, so I don't care about emissions. The only way to find out about power is to do a dyno run (it's the moral of my story - lots of claims are made about chips and "free-flowing" exhaust but the dyno is the only way to know).
Old 05-31-2005, 04:45 PM
  #30  
Scooter92
Instructor
 
Scooter92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Given the advice here and my research, it looks like the B&B would not be the best choice for me. I already have the primary bypass and chip, so I am thinking about the cat bypass or premuffler. Should I expect some hp/torque? Should it be a little louder? Better choice - cat bypass or premuffler?


Quick Reply: Dyno results for exhaust changes



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:01 PM.