Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TWIN SPARK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2017, 10:56 AM
  #31  
Turbohead
Rennlist Member
 
Turbohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palm Beaches Fl /Southern VT
Posts: 1,737
Received 49 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschenut_Lee


Significantly lower compression ratios on the turbo motors, less of a chance for detonation after ignition.
But compression pressure rise significantly on boost .
Old 12-14-2017, 11:56 AM
  #32  
JasonAndreas
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member

 
JasonAndreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USVI
Posts: 8,138
Received 112 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

I thought I read somewhere that for their street engines the trade off was that the additional surface area and mass for cooling the head was more important than any additional timing they could run? Porsche motorsports did twin-plug the M64/82 used in the MY98-99 993 GT2 EVO but they also had to use Secan intercoolers to reduce the intake temperature.
Old 12-14-2017, 01:10 PM
  #33  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Turbohead
Yes but production Turbos 930,965,993 TT all were single plug design. Why ?
Elliot
Street engines run .8 bar; race engines run 1.4 to 1.8 bar is one reason as well as cost.
Old 12-14-2017, 01:17 PM
  #34  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JasonAndreas
I thought I read somewhere that for their street engines the trade off was that the additional surface area and mass for cooling the head was more important than any additional timing they could run? .

With twin plugs you actually need to run less timing, meaning MBT moves closer to TDC. That is because mixture burns faster (having ignited simultaneosly from both sides of the combustion chamber).
Old 12-16-2017, 01:01 PM
  #35  
Lorenfb
Race Car
 
Lorenfb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Wagner
Cupcar:

I would have to question what you call "folklore". If I understand the reason the twin spark was used it was to allow a higher compression ratio with the car, hence more horsepower. The twin spark doesn't create the extra horse power...I suppose you could say it makes it possible though. Without the twin spark the car will suffer from pre-detonation.

<img src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" border="0" alt="[cheers]" /> Bill Wagner
Most need to re-read what was written over 15 years ago to get the simple answer!

Read under "Detonation" here: http://www.systemsc.com/problems.htm

Last edited by Lorenfb; 12-16-2017 at 01:25 PM.



Quick Reply: TWIN SPARK



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:52 PM.