Best headers / exhaust combination
#31
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
quick resurrection of what I am assured is a dead post.
1. how is it that the stock 964 set up is so good when the vast HP gains seen in the 993 cars had to do with a less restrictive exhaust set up? just curious
2. also above someone asked who does the singer exhaust set up, anyone know ?
Thanks
1. how is it that the stock 964 set up is so good when the vast HP gains seen in the 993 cars had to do with a less restrictive exhaust set up? just curious
2. also above someone asked who does the singer exhaust set up, anyone know ?
Thanks
w/o valve overlap tuned headers only provide better mass flow
a 964 oe exhaust has 3.75mm primary tubes flowing into 64.9x33.5mm x over, flowing into 2 mufflers and a cat
the most restrictive part is the primary muffler(396cfm@6500)followed by the cat(442cfm@6500) and then secondary muffler(462cfm@6500)
at 100% VE a 964 flows 413cfm@6500
surprize, surprize the factory put an adequate flowing exhaust on the cars
now if you change the cams to something w/ a little bite, say SS cams then the headers can add something to the party.
The following users liked this post:
cobalt (09-20-2023)
#32
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
993 picked up 22 hp and 14lb-ft from combination of exhaust head/valve and air flow measurement changes
w/o valve overlap tuned headers only provide better mass flow
a 964 oe exhaust has 3.75mm primary tubes flowing into 64.9x33.5mm x over, flowing into 2 mufflers and a cat
the most restrictive part is the primary muffler(396cfm@6500)followed by the cat(442cfm@6500) and then secondary muffler(462cfm@6500)
at 100% VE a 964 flows 413cfm@6500
surprize, surprize the factory put an adequate flowing exhaust on the cars
now if you change the cams to something w/ a little bite, say SS cams then the headers can add something to the party.
w/o valve overlap tuned headers only provide better mass flow
a 964 oe exhaust has 3.75mm primary tubes flowing into 64.9x33.5mm x over, flowing into 2 mufflers and a cat
the most restrictive part is the primary muffler(396cfm@6500)followed by the cat(442cfm@6500) and then secondary muffler(462cfm@6500)
at 100% VE a 964 flows 413cfm@6500
surprize, surprize the factory put an adequate flowing exhaust on the cars
now if you change the cams to something w/ a little bite, say SS cams then the headers can add something to the party.
I know we haven’t Met but you’re a true knowledge master on this forum and appreciate the follow up. You don’t happen to know what the 3.8 L RS 993 flow looks like as it pertains to exhaust size?
Last edited by escar0le; 09-16-2023 at 01:49 PM.
#33
Instructor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Currently running a cat delete with secondary bypass, it's definitley the most rewarding sound on a 964 IMHO. Im sure there's small gains to be had but as Bill mentioned, not much without head/cam work.
#34
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
993 street exhaust is 39mm(1.53") ID primary tubes, Cup and RSR ran 42mm(1.625") ID primaries but also ran to 7400 rpm, where low is 503cfm
The following users liked this post:
PAOLOP (09-17-2023)
#36
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Pete
#37
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On this side of the pond in Switzerland two specialists with rolling roads recommended independently of each other the standard headers, sport cats and a primary cup by pass.
(Mecacomponents & Sportec)
(Mecacomponents & Sportec)
#38
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)