Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Did you install a Transmission mount?
No - too noisy
10.00%
No - limited benefit
40.00%
Yes - no regrets
50.00%
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

Transmission Mount

Old 06-07-2018, 06:29 PM
  #1  
HDA
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
HDA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 1,319
Received 176 Likes on 94 Posts
Default Transmission Mount

Looking for the Rennlisters feedback here. Do you have an aftermarket transmission mount?

1) WHAT!?!? -> Too noisy
2) No -> No benefit
3) Yes -> shifting greatly improved
4) Other
Old 06-08-2018, 01:31 AM
  #2  
911 jared
Rennlist Member
 
911 jared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Southern Ca
Posts: 778
Received 206 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

i have the FD solid trans mount on my 89 c4. And yes, it is a lil noisy. but i'm relieved I'm not the only one. i thought something was installed wrong at first, until i researched the product.
Old 06-08-2018, 02:53 AM
  #3  
Peteinjp
Rennlist Member
 
Peteinjp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,419
Received 175 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

I have orange inserts ready to go but waiting for the transmission to get buttoned up. Sub’d

pete
Old 06-08-2018, 08:50 AM
  #4  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,159
Received 1,926 Likes on 1,166 Posts
Default

I found that the there is little improvement and replacing the rear two hydraulic mounts with solid is good enough for track or street.
Old 06-08-2018, 08:58 AM
  #5  
Goughary
Race Car
 
Goughary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: fairfield, CT
Posts: 4,819
Likes: 0
Received 395 Likes on 262 Posts
Default

I agree with cobalt. I installed a new oem trans mount, drive that. Then installed stiffeners, then removed them when looking for noises. You can barely tell the difference.

There is a difference. And some may like it better. It's just not "best bang for the buck"...

One thing is for sure. It won't make the car faster. So don't think of it as a real performance upgrade. If the car had a ton more hp and torque, and i were tracking it, it would be a good idea to add the support. But a stock 964 has very little hp and torque, so with good engine mounts you aren't twisting things too much and the little triangle stays aligned well under on-off throttle.
Old 06-08-2018, 10:19 AM
  #6  
911Jetta
Rennlist Member
 
911Jetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 7,214
Received 485 Likes on 278 Posts
Default

I've now installed them to two different 964s. 964s are actually really soft 911s, and most people drive around with their engines banging around because of worn-out sloppy motor mounts.

If you've ever installed new, tighter motor mounts you know how much that improves the feeling of the car as you set it up for a turn (not to mention shifting). It's still a subtle mod to most, especially when just cruising around, but it's actually a big improvement in the car's stability through turns. The transmission insert, is just a continuation of this. It too is subtle (at lower durometers = 60A), but it takes another level of twist and flex out of the drive train and increases the cars predictability and stability. Given this car's rear weight bias, I'll gladly take more reassurance.

I'm looking at it as not just one part, but part of a whole drive train system. Stiffer motor mounts, short shift kit, solid forward shift rod and Goldenrod + trans insert make for such a solid and locked down chassis. With the insert, both cars had a completely locked down drive train feeling. No on/off throttle slop at all, but not harsh, just direct. Drive a car like that on curvy back road for an hour and I guarantee you will appreciate the difference. Viewed that way, I definitely see it a performance upgrade.

At $130, plus an hour install, I also see it as an awesome "bang for buck" upgrade. The insert also protects the OEM trans mount. It's a smart product.

So it's subtle, but big at the same time. I'm not pretending to be a racer, I'm just looking for a more precise and honest feeling from the car.

One last thing, tailoring this response to OP (Mr. Italian), it's a natural for you given all the other RS+ upgrades you are already doing.
Old 06-08-2018, 10:29 AM
  #7  
HDA
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
HDA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 1,319
Received 176 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911Jetta
One last thing, tailoring this response to OP (Mr. Italian), it's a natural for you given all the other RS+ upgrades you are already doing.
Nailed it my friend.
First my transmission mount has 170k miles: time to refresh it?

I will do for sure the FD SSK + GR (best all around package I could find). Solid engine mounts come next so -> yeah transmission mount (FD as well?) will probably go.

I once had an Integra Type R with HASport mounts and that car became a giant ***** when cold: the whole car was vibrating so much! But that front end when driving it hard...ah, loved it!
Old 06-08-2018, 11:10 AM
  #8  
chsu74
Rennlist Member
 
chsu74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 9,615
Received 311 Likes on 259 Posts
Default

It is loud when oil is warm. I would not classify the FD trans mount as street friendly together with LWFW and RS motor mounts. It transmits more sound than any other mod.

I don't hate it but there are many times I wished for a quieter cabin when driving. Do the function first insert instead.
Old 06-08-2018, 11:22 AM
  #9  
HDA
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
HDA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 1,319
Received 176 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chsu74
It is loud when oil is warm. I would not classify the FD trans mount as street friendly together with LWFW and RS motor mounts. It transmits more sound than any other mod.

I don't hate it but there are many times I wished for a quieter cabin when driving. Do the function first insert instead.
Thanks appreciate the insight!
Old 06-08-2018, 07:38 PM
  #10  
tjb616
Rennlist Member
 
tjb616's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,537
Received 135 Likes on 105 Posts
Default

I have the Rennline tubular engine carrier, Rennline "tunable" motor mounts on the stiffest setting, and a poly trans bushing and I absolutely adore the combination.
Old 06-08-2018, 09:25 PM
  #11  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,474
Received 1,728 Likes on 1,057 Posts
Default

For mine i used rothsport reinforced engine carrier, wevo stiff rear mounts, and rennlines stiffer trans mount. I suspect it will be fine. I opted not for solids lol. I also put dynamat on the tunnel. I know what a lwfw and solid bits sound like. Would be fine. Lots of mechanical noise but not harsh.
Old 06-09-2018, 07:30 AM
  #12  
911Jetta
Rennlist Member
 
911Jetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 7,214
Received 485 Likes on 278 Posts
Default

BTW, want to be clear. My comment above is referring to the function first trans insert (slips into the voids of the stock mount). No experience with solid mounts, RS, etc.

http://www.function-first.com/produc...s-mount-insert (no affiliation)

Last edited by 911Jetta; 06-11-2018 at 10:25 AM. Reason: add pic and link
Old 06-09-2018, 08:16 AM
  #13  
540964
Racer
 
540964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 280
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I used the 65shore bush, purchased from FVD. p/n 964 375 055 02. Installed at recent engine rebuild, I already had the RS engine mounts, I don’t find it harsh but much better vehicle dynamics and better transmission shifting. I would do this again, no question. The OE trans mount was cracking and had failed.
https://www.fvd.net/us-en/9643750550...-65-shore.html

Old 06-11-2018, 08:42 AM
  #14  
freno a mano
Instructor
 
freno a mano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Genova - Italy
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've solid engine mounts and stock transmission mount. I'm very happy with this setup, definitely better stability and shifting, little noise added.
Old 06-11-2018, 09:46 AM
  #15  
chsu74
Rennlist Member
 
chsu74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 9,615
Received 311 Likes on 259 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911Jetta
BTW, want to be clear. My comment above is referring to the function first trans insert (slips into the voids of the stock mount). No experience with solid mounts, RS, etc.
Do this before FD semi solid mount. I have FD mount in my car right now and it is not street friendly with RS motor mount and LWFW. Have FF insert sitting in the garage for a swap out when I get a chance..

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Transmission Mount



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:13 PM.