Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

968 mirrors & door handles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2003, 05:35 PM
  #46  
rhesus
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
rhesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: socal
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not sure if I like the rounder mirrors over the square ones, but I may upgrade to cup mirrors just because mine whistle so bloody much!
Old 10-06-2003, 10:05 PM
  #47  
Sach951
Pro
 
Sach951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A2, MI
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Aero! It's a performance modification... really... weight reduction and reduced drag coefficient..
Old 10-06-2003, 11:22 PM
  #48  
Matt H
Race Director
 
Matt H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,712
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

if you don't like the '80s look, get a more modern Porsche

I like the look just fine, but if you use this logic no one would ever change a part on a car. I.e. if you dont like that 80s DME chips then buy a newer car. FYI, I DO think that 80s Ferrari's for the most part are ugly, otherwise I would have one. I am seriously considering a 348TS, I just dont like the 288, 308, 328 or 440i. If I wanted to look like Don Johnson I would have to buy a white suit to match and I dont look good in white pants Then again does anyone???
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old 10-07-2003, 12:17 AM
  #49  
keith
Drifting
 
keith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

About the teardrops and aesthetics: everyone wants to go so absolute on the flag vs. the teardrops - the flag mirrors work fine aesthetically on the car, but from some angles are far too square for the more rounded 951 front end. On the other hand, the teardrops may seem too rounded for the boxy fender sides, but the slope of the top of the mirror echoes the slope of the top of the boxed fenders on the 951 as well as the rounded-ness of the 951 nose from some angles.

IMO, NEITHER mirror works 100% on these cars, both of them look "stuck on" and they are placed in a very bad place on the door, aesthetically. There may be engineering reasons for their placement, but it sure ain't line of sight or visual design based...

That being said, I am going 968 mirrors, handles, 17" cups, and 968 wing eventually, and in combination, these items work well on the car, in my most experienced and well-reasoned opinion.

BTW, that 288 is ugly. However, the flag mirrors are perfect for that overall design. Doesn't make them perfect for every 80s era car, though.
( I love ya, Luis! )
Old 10-07-2003, 01:02 AM
  #50  
TurboTime
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
TurboTime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rosamond, CA -Willow Springs RCWY
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can't believe the response on this when I started it. I don't think I've seen more opinions other than an oil type debate. Thanks for all the inputs, maybe we should put this one to bed now???

SIMONK - your car is beautiful. Nice paint job! I'd be nervous to drive for fear of a rock chip at 100+ mph.

Seems like most agree positive on the new door handles but it's 50/50 on the mirrors.

Now let's start talking about a 3.0L 968 turbo'd engine in our 951s!

Cheers!


TurboTime
Old 10-07-2003, 01:42 AM
  #51  
porshhhh951
Monkeys Removed by Request
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
porshhhh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 7,713
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i love the door handle's.........i am not sure about the side mirrors.....is there alot of labor invloved with the swtich....??? I also want a front splitter and 968 wing on my car.....i hope i really dont have to change out the hole hatch.......although i could always go plexi glass.....or maybe lexan.......hmm......too many choices
btw ......glad to hear that i am not the only one running 18 psi of boost......how long do you guys think my bottom end will hold up.
Old 10-07-2003, 02:26 AM
  #52  
TurboTime
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
TurboTime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rosamond, CA -Willow Springs RCWY
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, my 17-18 psi has held up for over a year now. With my Guru stage II, I'm not too worried about it.
TurboTime
Old 10-07-2003, 03:51 AM
  #53  
Luis de Prat
Rennlist Member
 
Luis de Prat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 9,714
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Matt H
FYI, I DO think that 80s Ferrari's for the most part are ugly, otherwise I would have one. I am seriously considering a 348TS, I just dont like the 288, 308, 328 or 440i.
Fully agree with you on the Don J. look...
...but like you said, everyone is entitled to an opinion -this is tangential to the thread of course- but I find it hard to believe that you would call the 288 "ugly." If you prefer the 348 to the previous 3-series F-car design, then from your preferences I understand you'd be happier with a more modern looking car. For others like myself, however, the 348 design was when the line took a big detour down the Japanese road of car design.

IMHO, the logic for keeping cars looking stock does not extend to what you're saying. Aesthetic upgrades are essentially different from performance mods. Nothing more fun than the "wolf in sheep's clothing" that many 951s on the road turn out to be to unexpecting newer sportscars. Likewise, I'll be the first to put updated lighting in a 356 but wouldn't consider changing its mirrors or door handles.
Old 10-07-2003, 07:54 AM
  #54  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Luis de Prat
Nothing more fun than the "wolf in sheep's clothing" that many 951s on the road turn out to be to unexpecting newer sportscars.
Nicely put.

IMO if the 944 was still looking "modern" by today's standards, the average car enthusiast would just think "Well, not bad but not quite above average ...", but the fact it still delivers such performance after all these years often make for greater respect from non-experts, indeed because of the dated-looking mirrors, the Golf headlights/door handles, etc.

Just my $0.02 worth.
Old 10-07-2003, 08:36 AM
  #55  
Robby
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Robby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[i]Originally posted by Thom
....but the fact it still delivers such performance after all these years often make for greater respect from non-experts, indeed because of the dated-looking mirrors, the Golf headlights/door handles, etc...
AND the fact that it's a 4-banger...

Old 10-07-2003, 11:24 AM
  #56  
icat
Race Car
 
icat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Katy, TX - Texas Greaseslingers West
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I did the door handles before I did the mirrors. Having done so I'm qualified to express the following opinion on 968 door handles without 968 mirrors: Yuck! It doesn't look good. If you only do one, 'ya gotta do the mirrors.

If you don't want the aero mirrors, then I think the next best option is the painted door handles. I've also seen a 951 with aero mirrors and stock, but painted, handles. Looked nice.
Old 10-07-2003, 12:33 PM
  #57  
Matt H
Race Director
 
Matt H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,712
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Luis - I dont know why it is but I just cant get into the look of the older (read 1980s) Ferrari's with the exception of the Tesstarossa (and it would have to have bigger wheels). The other big disappointment in the ones I have driven is the interior, it feels good but doesnt seem to go with my idea of a sportscar.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old 10-07-2003, 01:46 PM
  #58  
mochman
Pro
 
mochman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OOOOOOOOOHH!!!! Revered 3.0 conversion be still my beating heart.
Old 11-15-2010, 01:53 AM
  #59  
RZ944T
5th Gear
 
RZ944T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am replacing stock 86 951 door handles with 968 aero door handle kit. I was able to get the door handles installed using the existing actuator, but now cannot get the latches and the locks to work correctly. Does anybody have an answer. I am thinking that the 944 actuator may not work with the 968 handle. I tried replacing the actuator per Ken Foster's directions, but couldn't remove the old 944 actuators. Any advice from folks who have done this before? thanks
Old 11-15-2010, 02:01 AM
  #60  
RZ944T
5th Gear
 
RZ944T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey Keith,
I am replacing the stock handles on my 86 951 with the 968 style handles per your directions. I tried to remove the stock actuator, but gave up and chose to use the stock actuator reduce the size of the actuator tabs on the 968 handles. BTW, had to reduce the width of both tabs on the handle not just the bottom one. Was successful getting the handles installed, but now cannot get the latches and the locks (manual) to work correctly. They both act as if they are jammed. Not sure what I did wrong. Any advice? I am wondering if the stock 944 actuator does not work correctly with the 968 style handle. Thank you very much for putting together the directions for the handles and the mirrors. I plan to do the mirrors immediately after the door handles.


Quick Reply: 968 mirrors & door handles



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:15 AM.