Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Haltech Tune Help 3.0L 16v

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2015, 09:45 AM
  #16  
Ernie J
Pro
 
Ernie J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Haltech

Call John Behe, he can help you out. 1-410-712-4290 He can tune it , he set up mine, although not a S2. He's in Maryland, its worth the drive.
Old 01-06-2016, 07:40 PM
  #17  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 647 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

I got the base map for 944 turbo which should be a good starting point today, so if anyone needs a copy I can share.


Old 01-07-2016, 05:24 AM
  #18  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Lowest kpa value is 50kpa? Seems a bit high as I have seen 951/S2 motors that easily pull 28-30 kpa at idle which means that engine would run outside the range of the table. If you are planning to use ITB's that should make it a moot point though (usually 50-60 kpa is the lowest you can get with ITB's).
Old 01-07-2016, 07:07 AM
  #19  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 647 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Must explore this haltech software. Probably column can be added to this map. What about the values, do those seem right?
Old 01-07-2016, 12:56 PM
  #20  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I can judge ignition table by just looking at it but fuel table is so unique to each ECU that there is absolutely no point in trying to analyse it. Unless it is totally off of course which that one does not seem to be.
Old 01-07-2016, 02:35 PM
  #21  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 647 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

This is the ign table..

Old 01-07-2016, 05:46 PM
  #22  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

It actually looks pretty good for 16v, 951 8v could make use of more advance.
Old 01-07-2016, 06:38 PM
  #23  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 647 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Thank you. Appreciate some actual 16vT knowledge.

These are the target AFRs. How do these look?

If I understand this correctly, ecu can (with CANbus wideband) run in closed loop from this table without the risk of sensor error since CANbus wideband reports wideband state/errors to ecu?


Old 01-08-2016, 11:24 PM
  #24  
odonnell
Rennlist Member
 
odonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 4,763
Received 63 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Are those kPa values relative to atmosphere or relative to vacuum? I'm used to seeing relative to vacuum. Just be careful because your entire graph could be off by 100 kPa if you tune it one way, and the code has it set up for another. If this is relative to atmosphere, you're coming into boost at 13.x
Old 01-08-2016, 11:38 PM
  #25  
968gene
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
968gene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,670
Received 97 Likes on 30 Posts
Default Knock Sensors?

For the Haltech Elite Series, it looks like only the Haltech Elite 2500 has the capacity for two knock sensors (the Elite 1500 just one).

Q: what do other systems offer? My current ECU, Euro1, does not have provision for knock sensors and there was evidence of detonation during the rebuild.
Old 01-09-2016, 06:24 AM
  #26  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voith
These are the target AFRs. How do these look?

At 2bar boost (197kpa) it looks to be too rich imo, does not mater what boost, 10.x is too rich and it does not help much to protect the engine. I would go for 11.2-11.5 range. It will still puff some black smoke, Porsche 16v engines seem to give black smoke in relatively high AFR's, don't know why, seen that with several engines.
At 1 bar range, aim for 12.0, at 1.4-1.5 bars aim for 11.7-11.8 and interpolate the other cells between those. That is safe enough.
Old 01-09-2016, 11:20 AM
  #27  
Max Energy
Rennlist Member
 
Max Energy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Default Engine Management

Gene,
I am going with a Motec for this new 968 race motor
Max
Attached Images    
Old 01-09-2016, 11:34 AM
  #28  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 968gene

Q: what do other systems offer? My current ECU, Euro1, does not have provision for knock sensors and there was evidence of detonation during the rebuild.
VEMS for example has support for two knock sensors, work perfectly with 944/968 engine.
Old 01-09-2016, 12:19 PM
  #29  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 647 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

That mm itb setup looks awesome. Which motec ecu will you use max?
Old 01-09-2016, 12:55 PM
  #30  
968gene
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
968gene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,670
Received 97 Likes on 30 Posts
Default Max

"Gene,
I am going with a Motec for this new 968 race motor
Max"

Max, I'm a bit stumped on what to use as the initial start up mapping. I've got a fresh engine and have anxiety about too rich and too lean during start up.


Quick Reply: Haltech Tune Help 3.0L 16v



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:59 PM.