Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Intake concept question?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2015, 05:04 AM
  #16  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I was actually going to just write out the formula from my book, but then found a reference to this website. I would love to build my own intake, if i only knew my cam specs i could follow the formula.
Old 03-18-2015, 05:55 AM
  #17  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Going off the link that Pauly posted it says that those split plenums are designed more for quick response bottom end stuff. Perhaps they're also more suitable to n/a motors?
This kind of plenum is used more or less on all WRC cars and was also used on Audi S1 and other cars from Grupe B.. All turbos.

I will design one that will be something between these two. Too bad our brake booster is taking up so much space.







Old 03-18-2015, 07:06 AM
  #18  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

While those intakes are on turbo cars they're on small capacity rally motors which need quick low down acceleration rather than more power up top on a race motor.

Removing your brake booster is an easy decision. Change to a pedal box and be done with it.
Old 03-18-2015, 11:38 AM
  #19  
grumpyf14d
Rennlist Member
 
grumpyf14d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Louisville
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

After doing some lengthy research, I thought Audi's concept was best and spoke volumes considering the success of the car and engine. Now understanding what the total volume of the plenum needs to be is as important as the shape.
Attached Images  
Old 03-18-2015, 04:33 PM
  #20  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Well volume is another thing that seems to get a lot of different opinions or beliefs. We don't seem to count the pipe from t/body as part of the plenum volume either.

Guess the bottom line is that unless we make and compare intakes we are doing a fair bit of guess work and with tune-able ECUs and knock systems we can work around seemingly pretty agricultural setups (as seen on mostly other modified turbo cars).
Old 03-18-2015, 05:42 PM
  #21  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I did the dual-plenum intakes both on my 931 2litre engine and my 2.5 16v. Inside the main plenum are 70mm velocity stacks:


Old 03-18-2015, 05:47 PM
  #22  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

I envy your awesome skills raceboy
Old 03-19-2015, 06:56 AM
  #23  
mikey_audiogeek
Three Wheelin'
 
mikey_audiogeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,547
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Hi Patrick,
The split/tapered plenum is designed to give even flow distribution to all cylinders under all conditions. In my opinion much more important than bellmouthing the runners. Best off-the-shelf manifolds I've seen are the Jenvey ones from the UK. The calculations for the slot dimensions and manifold taper rate should take into account the velocity pressure of the air, something that isn't replicated on the flowbench.
We took a different tack with our motor - dual throttles, one at each end of the manifold. Reduced the issue by 75%, but created some others...
Cheers,
Mike
Old 03-19-2015, 07:02 AM
  #24  
mikey_audiogeek
Three Wheelin'
 
mikey_audiogeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,547
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Going off the link that Pauly posted it says that those split plenums are designed more for quick response bottom end stuff. Perhaps they're also more suitable to n/a motors?
Nope, definitely more suitable for turbos. Bigger payoff.
Cheers,
Mike
Old 03-19-2015, 08:13 AM
  #25  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I personally would not make any intake manifold without velocity stacks...
Old 03-19-2015, 08:24 AM
  #26  
Dutch944
Three Wheelin'
 
Dutch944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hollandaaaa
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I've used the velocity stacks in my intake as well, i can measure the outside diameter for you Patrick, but i think i'm close to 100mm as well, as we had to make a small dent in the stacks to make them fit.

My intake is actually completely build up like your drawing, except for the fact that is not really getting any smaller on the other side of where the velocity stacks are.

Do you want to measure mine completely? Ofcourse it's for 16v but in big lines it should be similar for 8v!
Old 03-19-2015, 06:53 PM
  #27  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikey_audiogeek
Hi Patrick,
The split/tapered plenum is designed to give even flow distribution to all cylinders under all conditions. In my opinion much more important than bellmouthing the runners. Best off-the-shelf manifolds I've seen are the Jenvey ones from the UK. The calculations for the slot dimensions and manifold taper rate should take into account the velocity pressure of the air, something that isn't replicated on the flowbench.
We took a different tack with our motor - dual throttles, one at each end of the manifold. Reduced the issue by 75%, but created some others...
Cheers,
Mike
Originally Posted by mikey_audiogeek
Nope, definitely more suitable for turbos. Bigger payoff.
Cheers,
Mike
Yes, I was more surmising on the turbo or n/a thing there Mike. It's still possible that they're more suited to lower rpm response and clearly the main idea is to have even distribution of flow.

Thanks for re posting that Jenvey name. I had looked at these in the past and now wonder how well they'd be suited to our particular motor and of course packaging. Looks like you could run one of their intakes and some velocity stacks. The added attraction of this intake is the cast nature assuming it would resist collapsing. The other aspect we need to consider is location and size of turbo and wanting to keep the intake away from there as much as possible.


http://www.jenvey.co.uk/home/turbo-p...g-70mm-aplc-70
Old 03-19-2015, 06:56 PM
  #28  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dutch944
I've used the velocity stacks in my intake as well, i can measure the outside diameter for you Patrick, but i think i'm close to 100mm as well, as we had to make a small dent in the stacks to make them fit.

My intake is actually completely build up like your drawing, except for the fact that is not really getting any smaller on the other side of where the velocity stacks are.

Do you want to measure mine completely? Ofcourse it's for 16v but in big lines it should be similar for 8v!
Thanks Bas. Do you have the specs on your stacks? Do you have a pic/s of the stacks sitting inside the plenum before it's sealed up? The reason that I am considering the 'side taper' is only due to size of turbo and heat etc. Seems like you've clearanced yours while retaining a thick plenum all the way across. btw, how thick is your plenum from top to bottom ?
Old 03-19-2015, 07:20 PM
  #29  
gruhsy
Drifting
 
gruhsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,559
Received 51 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

I would think if enough people were interested Michael Mount might make 2V ITB's
Old 03-19-2015, 07:47 PM
  #30  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

There are NO issues absolutely with collapsing at all with custom intakes. There may be if the plenums are made of 1mm sheet aluminium, but not when built with common sens of engineering in mind.

We have ran our custom built intakes up to 3 bars of boost (=4 bars of absolute pressure) and no issues whatsoever.

I would suggest not to overthink the ideas, just use your common sense, some math and then some skills and you will get the best result.


Quick Reply: Intake concept question?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:11 AM.