Which Block 2.5 or 3.0
#2
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Interesting dilemma.
Are you starting from zero?
Are you starting from zero?
#5
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Louisville
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes dry sleeving, I would like some bottom end power as this will be a full race car and need the bottom end power for most of the tracks which leads me down the 3l path I think. I will be using a stand alone and am undecided on one or two injectors per cylinder. Will be doing individual coils and sequential injection. Plan on doing ITB from Kinsler or one of our Rennlisters. Will be making my own dual plenum intake (Audi Copy). Haven't chosen a turbo yet but thinking 3582x.
Not sure on bore size but at least 104.
Trying to also decide on half fill or full fill block.
Not sure on bore size but at least 104.
Trying to also decide on half fill or full fill block.
#6
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Official Jack off extinguisher
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
550 wheel for the track where you turn a steering wheel ? Have 30 k ready , be prepared to count engine life in hours not miles....but 2 injectors , stand alone " big power" ITB and similar statements spell this will never go beyond the dream stage .
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
I think for a track car aiming at that h/p number then I'd go with the 3lt block. Especially if you're not going to employ a deckplate. I'd definitely not knife edge the crank if you're going to stick with a stock crank. We had a catastrophic failure and everything points to the knife edged crank as being the main culprit. Not sure where you're located and what the tracks are like but we're going from a 3.1lt motor to a 2.5ltr for the time being. I'm actually hopeful that this will provide us more linear torque and increase driveability. Having gobs of torque on a race car isn't always the fastest way around a track in my opinion.
#9
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Louisville
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think for a track car aiming at that h/p number then I'd go with the 3lt block. Especially if you're not going to employ a deckplate. I'd definitely not knife edge the crank if you're going to stick with a stock crank. We had a catastrophic failure and everything points to the knife edged crank as being the main culprit. Not sure where you're located and what the tracks are like but we're going from a 3.1lt motor to a 2.5ltr for the time being. I'm actually hopeful that this will provide us more linear torque and increase driveability. Having gobs of torque on a race car isn't always the fastest way around a track in my opinion.
#10
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
His budget is his, he bought my old track car, smoothest transaction I ever did. There is a plan with the car, so if he does go 3.0L, he will have a brand new 2.5L for sale that has less than 10 hours on it, 101mm Mahle, LR II head, MAF and such that should do 355 -370 rwhp. Sit back and relax...
Keep us updated Keith, especially when the wide body kit starts.
#11
Rennlist Member
+1 that was my thought as well. The 104mm cylinders are conjoined and have a higher floor support, so less wiggling around, and some have squirters. And the 2.7 head mates up, with its bigger valves and portable ports. And the balance shafts will be a better match if you use them.
#12
Rennlist Member
Even though dyno charts don't give a true indication of how the motor actually performs on the track, it still gives a reasonable approximation. Our old 3.1 had a pretty decent hit of tq. The chart showed a rise from 250ft/lb to over 500ft/lb in about 700rpms. This meant we had to employ a fair bit of traction control (right foot) at times. Obviously slow speed corners are the most difficult but even medium speed corners require a bit of delicateness.
By the sound of it you have bought a good working car with a decent motor in it now. Are you going to try the car like it is before building up a monster motor? If so, you'll get a better indication of what sort of curve you want/need from the new motor.
#13
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Louisville
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So the plan as of right now is to: put a fuel cell in it, 12-16 point roll cage, new wiring, new dash, & fire extinguishing system. Run the car for a few events so my son can get use to driving the car, then tear it a part. I've got to go on a deployment at the end of the year for 7 months so during that time I will be building up the parts for the engine and body.
Middle of next year the new wide body kit will go on it and finally over the winter the new engine will be in it for the 2017 season and the car's 30th anniversary. Will finish it off with running the Daytona Historic 24 hours class 8. That's the goal.
Middle of next year the new wide body kit will go on it and finally over the winter the new engine will be in it for the 2017 season and the car's 30th anniversary. Will finish it off with running the Daytona Historic 24 hours class 8. That's the goal.
#14
Rennlist Member
Sounds like some great goals there. Good luck on all endeavors and keep us posted along the way.
#15
Rennlist Member
I would go with the 3.0 L. Be aware that sleeveing can be tricky. Different material thermal expansion rates, etc. You may want to look at E85 as a fuel source as it burns cooler and heat is hard on these engines.